Skip to main content
TNCTennant CompanySell4.1·$91.01+2.52%
TNC · Why this verdict

Why Tennant (TNC) is rated SELL

Updated

Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Show full disclosure ▾

About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.

Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.

Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.

No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.

No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.

Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.

Methodology · Editorial policy & full disclaimer

VerdictSELL
Overall score4.1/10
ConfidenceMEDIUM
MacroNEUTRAL
TrendMatrix Research · core thesis

Engine thesis — one sentence

Tennant Company has exceptional cash conversion at 170% of net income and a Piotroski score of 8 out of 9, but three consecutive earnings misses, negative asymmetry, and a below-average quality score create a weak investment thesis at current prices.

Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.

Thesis pillars

Free cash flow conversion of 170% relative to net income is exceptional and indicates the business generates substantially more cash than reported earnings suggest, making the stock potentially cheaper on a cash flow basis than the reported price-to-earnings multiple implies.

Stable
Quality breakdown
Expectation
Free cash flow as a percentage of net income remains above 120% over the next 12 months, confirming the cash quality is structural.

CounterExceptional free cash flow relative to net income in an industrial machinery company often reflects deferred capital expenditure rather than genuine cash generation efficiency, which could normalize when maintenance reinvestment catches up.

Three consecutive earnings misses — including a -71.7% negative surprise in Q4 2025 — with an average surprise of -9.8% over the past year indicate that analyst estimates consistently overshoot actual delivery, undermining confidence in the forward earnings outlook.

Stable
Earnings
Expectation
Beat count reaches at least 2 of the next 4 quarters and the average surprise percentage rises above -5% over the next year.

CounterThe most recent quarter delivered a 43.8% positive surprise against a very low bar estimate of $0.40, which may signal that expectations have now been reset to a level the company can meet.

Revenue growth is registering in the low single digits and earnings growth is at 0.0 out of 10, with the peer ranking for growth at the bottom of its group — placing Tennant in the weakest quartile for growth among specialty industrial machinery companies.

Stable
Growth
Expectation
Revenue growth accelerates above 5% year-over-year within 12 months, bringing the growth score above 3.0 out of 10.

CounterLow growth industrial companies can deliver strong total returns through disciplined capital allocation and share buybacks even without top-line acceleration, particularly when trading at reasonable multiples.

With upside of only 0.6% to the resistance target, asymmetry of -1.23, and the stock trading 10.2% above the analyst target, the price-to-target structure is unfavorable — meaning a position started today has more expected downside than upside on a 12-month basis.

Stable
Warnings
Expectation
Analyst consensus price target rises above $95, more than 9% above the current price of $86.59, re-establishing positive asymmetry for a new entry.

CounterHigh short interest of 10% creates a potential short-squeeze dynamic that could push price above the analyst target if any positive catalyst emerges, amplifying upside beyond the stated target.

Per-dimension breakdown

Value

5.0/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
P/E2.4
P/S9.5
EV/EBITDA2.7
Fwd P/E8.4
PEG3.9
Analyst target3.0
  • Forward P/E: 13.8x
  • PEG: 2.66

Quality

4.6/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
ROE1.8
ROA2.0
Gross margin3.9
Op margin0.7
Net margin1.3
Current ratio7.4
FCF quality10.0
Moat5.2
Piotroski F8.9
  • Excellent cash conversion: 170% FCF/NI
  • No competitive moat
  • Strong Piotroski F-Score: 8/9

Growth

1.6/10data confidence 67%
ComponentSub-score
Rev growth3.2
EPS growth0.0

Momentum

5.0/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
RSI5.0
MACD10.0
OBV1.0
MA position9.0
Volume0.0
  • Volume distribution (falling OBV)
  • Above 200-day MA

Sentiment

5.6/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
Analyst rating6.3
Price target5.3
erm sentiment5.0
  • Light analyst coverage (4.0) — signal dampened

Insider

4.8/10data confidence 50%
ComponentSub-score
materiality4.5
holder change5.1
  • Modest insider selling — $605,103 (0.040% of mkt cap)

Peer rank

2.1/10data confidence 80%
ComponentSub-score
value rank5.3
quality rank1.5
growth rank1.7

Technical

3.5/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
bollinger0.0
support resistance0.5
52w position9.9

Risk (lower is worse)

6.4/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
short interest4.8
days to cover5.5
volatility5.5
put call10.0
implied vol7.4
max pain risk5.0
beta6.5
debt equity6.6

Catalyst

3.0/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
erm5.0
earnings history0.0
earnings timing5.0
surprise avg0.0
dividend safety5.0
  • Earnings concerns: 1B/3M
  • Dividend: 140.0%

How the verdict was assembled

Engine trigger

Multiple concerning factors. Consider reducing position.

Engine technical detail
verdict_path: L4:PATH_F_SELL
Passed (7)
  • MOMENTUM:5.0>=4.5
  • INSIDER:OK
  • 8K:CLEAN
  • NEWS_EVENTS:NONE_RECENT
  • EARNINGS_PROXIMITY:42d clear
  • SEMI_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
  • MATERIALS_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
Failed (1)
  • ASYMMETRY:-1.4=NEGATIVE
Warning (1)
  • MOMENTUM:5.0<5.5 (soft — BUY_NOW allowed but watch)
Reward-to-Risk
-1.43
Upside
-13.1%
Downside
9.2%
Sizing output
AVOID

SetupBREAKOUT Golden cross, above all MAs, RSI 67, MACD bullish

EdgeNO_EDGE No clear edge identified

SuitabilityAGGRESSIVE MCap $1.5B<$5B

Investment implication

The F-path SELL output reflects an overall score of 4.1 below the 5.6 soft trigger — multiple weakening dimensions accumulated rather than a single hard-floor breach. The strongest dimension ( Risk (lower is worse) at 6.4) was not enough to lift the adjusted overall above the threshold. Co-occurring failed gates ( ASYMMETRY:-1.4=NEGATIVE) reinforce the read. Current asymmetry R:R is -1.43 — supplementary context, not the trigger for this path.

The strongest dimensions are Risk (lower is worse) at 6.4, Sentiment at 5.6, and Value at 5.0; the weakest are Growth at 1.6, Peer rank at 2.1, and Catalyst at 3.0. The V9 engine flagged 1 failed gate with 1 warning, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of -1.43 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.

What would invalidate the thesis

Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.

  • P1Free cash flow conversion of 170% relative to net income is exceptional and indicates the business generates substantially more cash than reported earnings suggest, making the stock potentially cheaper on a cash flow basis than the reported price-to-earnings multiple implies.

    Trip ifFree cash flow as a percentage of net income falls below 80%, more than 90 percentage points below the current 170%, signaling meaningful cash quality deterioration.

  • P2Three consecutive earnings misses — including a -71.7% negative surprise in Q4 2025 — with an average surprise of -9.8% over the past year indicate that analyst estimates consistently overshoot actual delivery, undermining confidence in the forward earnings outlook.

    Trip ifEPS surprise falls below 0% in at least 3 of the next 4 quarters, confirming that the 3-quarter miss streak has not resolved despite the recent low-bar beat.

  • P3Revenue growth is registering in the low single digits and earnings growth is at 0.0 out of 10, with the peer ranking for growth at the bottom of its group — placing Tennant in the weakest quartile for growth among specialty industrial machinery companies.

    Trip ifRevenue growth falls below 0% year-over-year in at least 2 of the next 4 reported quarters, confirming an absolute revenue contraction.

  • P4With upside of only 0.6% to the resistance target, asymmetry of -1.23, and the stock trading 10.2% above the analyst target, the price-to-target structure is unfavorable — meaning a position started today has more expected downside than upside on a 12-month basis.

    Trip ifAnalyst consensus price target falls below $78, more than 10% below the current price of $86.59, confirming the negative asymmetry is worsening rather than resolving.

Engine reasoning is mechanically derived from pipeline gate outputs. See decision view.

Home Stocks TNC Why this verdict