Value
8.3/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 9.3 |
| P/S | 7.9 |
| EV/EBITDA | 8.2 |
| Fwd P/E | 9.8 |
| PEG | 10.0 |
| Analyst target | 5.0 |
- ▸Forward P/E: 6.6x
- ▸PEG: 0.23
- ▸Attractively valued
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
Radian Group is a high-quality specialty insurance business with a wide economic moat, a perfect four-quarter earnings beat streak, 59% revenue growth, and an elite Rule of 40 score of 79 — but negative price momentum, concentrated exposure to the mortgage insurance segment, and elevated implied volatility of 91% temper the near-term entry case despite strong underlying fundamentals.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
Radian has a wide economic moat, an operating margin score of 10 out of 10, a net margin score of 10 out of 10, a Rule of 40 score of 79 (well above the 40 threshold), and a Piotroski F-Score of 8 out of 9 — placing it among the highest-quality businesses in the specialty financial services sector based on these fundamental measures. Quality breakdown | Operating margins remain above 35% and the Piotroski F-Score stays at 7 or above for at least 3 of the next 4 quarters, confirming durable business quality. | →Stable |
| CounterA free cash flow quality score of only 3.9 out of 10 is flagged as a red flag, with only 49% of net income converting to free cash flow — suggesting earnings quality is lower than the income statement alone implies. | ||
Radian has beaten earnings estimates in all four of the last four quarters, with a highly consistent beat pattern — surprises of 2.4%, 4.0%, 6.2%, and 3.6% — indicating the company is systematically delivering slightly above analyst expectations without dramatic swings, a pattern consistent with conservative management guidance. Earnings | Radian continues to beat earnings estimates in at least 3 of the next 4 quarters with consistent positive surprise above 2%. | →Stable |
| CounterThe narrow beat magnitude of 2.4% to 6.2% suggests analysts have largely calibrated to the company's run rate, leaving little room for upside revision catalysts that could drive meaningful multiple expansion. | ||
Radian has one high-concentration risk flag for its mortgage insurance segment, meaning a meaningful portion of its revenue and profit depends on the health of the US residential mortgage market — a cyclically sensitive exposure that could deteriorate materially in a housing downturn or rising default environment. Key risks | Mortgage insurance segment revenue remains stable or grows over the next 12 months, indicating no meaningful increase in default rates or premium compression affecting this concentrated exposure. | →Stable |
| CounterThe US housing market's structural undersupply and persistently high home prices provide a buffer against the type of widespread default scenario that would impair mortgage insurance economics, making this concentration risk more theoretical than near-term. | ||
A momentum score of only 3.9 out of 10 below the minimum threshold of 4.5, combined with falling on-balance volume indicating distribution, means that market participants are currently net sellers of Radian shares despite strong fundamentals — and the data supports waiting for a momentum improvement before initiating a new position. Momentum breakdown | Momentum score rises above 5.0 and on-balance volume returns to accumulation within 12 months, signaling that selling pressure has been absorbed. | →Stable |
| CounterAt a forward price-to-earnings ratio of 6.3x and PEG of 0.22, the stock is attractively valued relative to both its own growth rate and most financial peers — meaning the technical weakness may be an opportunity rather than a warning. | ||
CounterA free cash flow quality score of only 3.9 out of 10 is flagged as a red flag, with only 49% of net income converting to free cash flow — suggesting earnings quality is lower than the income statement alone implies.
CounterThe narrow beat magnitude of 2.4% to 6.2% suggests analysts have largely calibrated to the company's run rate, leaving little room for upside revision catalysts that could drive meaningful multiple expansion.
CounterThe US housing market's structural undersupply and persistently high home prices provide a buffer against the type of widespread default scenario that would impair mortgage insurance economics, making this concentration risk more theoretical than near-term.
CounterAt a forward price-to-earnings ratio of 6.3x and PEG of 0.22, the stock is attractively valued relative to both its own growth rate and most financial peers — meaning the technical weakness may be an opportunity rather than a warning.
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 9.3 |
| P/S | 7.9 |
| EV/EBITDA | 8.2 |
| Fwd P/E | 9.8 |
| PEG | 10.0 |
| Analyst target | 5.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 4.2 |
| ROA | 3.8 |
| Gross margin | 10.0 |
| Op margin | 10.0 |
| Net margin | 10.0 |
| Current ratio | 5.7 |
| FCF quality | 3.9 |
| Moat | 8.4 |
| Rule of 40 | 9.5 |
| Piotroski F | 8.9 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 10.0 |
| EPS growth | 7.7 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 4.2 |
| MACD | 10.0 |
| OBV | 10.0 |
| MA position | 9.0 |
| Volume | 0.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Analyst rating | 5.0 |
| Price target | 7.3 |
| erm sentiment | 6.1 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| materiality | 6.5 |
| insider conviction | 3.0 |
| holder change | 5.1 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 6.0 |
| quality rank | 3.5 |
| growth rank | 9.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 0.0 |
| support resistance | 1.5 |
| 52w position | 9.3 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 8.3 |
| days to cover | 7.9 |
| volatility | 7.2 |
| put call | 10.0 |
| implied vol | 6.0 |
| max pain risk | 3.0 |
| beta | 8.6 |
| debt equity | 8.9 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 8.0 |
| earnings history | 10.0 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 4.5 |
| dividend safety | 5.2 |
Maintain position. Not compelling to add more. | News modifier +1 (HOLD_IF_HOLDING → STRONG_BUY_WAIT).
L4:PATH_F_HOLD|L3:NEWS_MOD=+1SetupUNKNOWN — No clear chart pattern; technical signals are mixed
EdgeNO_EDGE — No clear edge identified
SuitabilityAGGRESSIVE — MCap $4.9B<$5B
None of the engine's positive-conviction paths (C-quality, D-momentum) triggered — the F-path HOLD reflects balanced signals. Strongest-cleared gate: MOMENTUM:6.6>=5.5. Top dim: Growth at 8.8; weakest: Technical at 3.6. No conviction either direction.
The strongest dimensions are Growth at 8.8, Value at 8.3, and Risk (lower is worse) at 7.5; the weakest are Technical at 3.6, Insider at 4.9, and Peer rank at 5.9. The V9 engine flagged 1 failed gate with 1 warning, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of 0.16 and an engine sizing output of STARTER.
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
Trip ifOperating margin falls below 30% in any single quarter, indicating a structural compression in the core insurance economics.
Trip ifEarnings surprise falls below -5% in at least 2 of the next 4 quarters, breaking the perfect beat streak and suggesting the conservative guidance cadence is no longer reliable.
Trip ifMortgage-related credit loss provisions increase by more than 50% quarter-over-quarter in any single period, indicating deterioration in the underlying mortgage portfolio quality.
Trip ifMomentum score remains below 4.0 for more than 3 consecutive months, confirming the technical weakness is persistent and not resolving with fundamental tailwinds.