Skip to main content
QRVOQorvo, Inc.Sell4.2·$96.04-1.17%
QRVO · Why this verdict

Why Qorvo (QRVO) is rated SELL

Updated

Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Show full disclosure ▾

About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.

Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.

Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.

No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.

No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.

Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.

Methodology · Editorial policy & full disclaimer

VerdictSELL
Overall score4.2/10
ConfidenceMEDIUM
MacroNEUTRAL
TrendMatrix Research · core thesis

Engine thesis — one sentence

Qorvo is a semiconductor company with exceptional free cash flow conversion of 164% and a strong 3-for-4 earnings beat record, but a critical customer concentration of 50% with Apple Inc., declining revenue of -7%, and a stock trading above its analyst price target combine to eliminate the near-term investment case.

Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.

Thesis pillars

With approximately 50% of revenue concentrated in Apple Inc. as disclosed in the 10-K, any shift in Apple's supply chain decisions, product mix changes, or component sourcing strategy poses an existential revenue risk to Qorvo's top line.

Stable
Bear case
Expectation
Revenue from non-Apple sources grows above 55% of total revenue within the next 12 months, reducing single-customer dependency.

CounterApple relationships typically provide volume stability and multi-year design win visibility; losing Apple content is unlikely within a short window given the deep integration of Qorvo components in existing iPhone models.

Qorvo converts 164% of net income into free cash flow, indicating that capital expenditures and working capital are well-managed and that reported earnings significantly understate actual cash returns to shareholders.

Stable
Quality breakdown
Expectation
Free cash flow conversion remains above 130% for the next two reported annual periods.

CounterDeclining revenue of -7% and falling earnings estimates of -15% suggest that even strong cash conversion cannot offset the top-line erosion that is shrinking the absolute level of free cash flow.

At $101.28 per share, the stock trades above its near-term resistance target of $107.30, producing only 5.9% upside to that level and a reward-to-risk ratio of 0.84 — well below the 1.5 minimum threshold needed to justify new entry.

Stable
Warnings
Expectation
Analyst price targets are revised upward above $120 following revenue stabilization.

CounterNegative asymmetry of -2.2 as measured by the engine indicates the stock has already priced in recovery expectations, and any earnings disappointment could lead to a sharp correction.

Earnings estimates have fallen -15% over the past 30 days, and the most recent quarter saw a -53.7% negative earnings surprise against an estimate of $0.69, reversing the prior trend of strong beats.

Stable
Catalyst breakdown
Expectation
Quarterly earnings estimates stabilize and stop declining for at least 2 consecutive quarters.

CounterThe three prior quarters showed beats of 742%, 5.1%, and 16.4%, and the single miss may reflect a specific one-time issue rather than a sustainable trend of estimate cuts.

Per-dimension breakdown

Value

6.3/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
P/E4.8
P/S8.7
EV/EBITDA5.3
Fwd P/E8.9
PEG7.0
Analyst target3.0
  • Forward P/E: 12.4x
  • PEG: 1.00

Quality

6.2/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
ROE3.4
ROA3.9
Gross margin5.2
Op margin6.4
Net margin4.6
Current ratio9.8
FCF quality10.0
Moat4.6
Piotroski F7.8
  • Excellent cash conversion: 164% FCF/NI
  • No competitive moat
  • Strong Piotroski F-Score: 7/9

Growth

0.9/10data confidence 67%
ComponentSub-score
Rev growth0.8
EPS growth0.9
  • Declining revenue: -7%

Momentum

2.9/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
RSI7.5
MACD0.0
OBV1.0
MA position6.0
Volume0.0
  • Uptrend pullback (RSI 40) - buy opportunity
  • Volume distribution (falling OBV)
  • Above 200-day MA

Sentiment

3.4/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
Analyst rating5.0
Price target4.2
erm sentiment0.0
  • Estimates falling as sentiment proxy (-15.0%)

Insider

3.0/10data confidence 75%
ComponentSub-score
materiality2.0
insider conviction2.0
holder change5.1
  • Heavy insider selling — $201,627,235 (2.357% of mkt cap)

Peer rank

3.5/10data confidence 80%
ComponentSub-score
value rank8.6
quality rank5.0
growth rank0.5
  • Attractive P/E vs peers

Technical

7.1/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
bollinger7.6
support resistance8.2
52w position7.6
gap5.0

Risk (lower is worse)

4.7/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
short interest4.5
days to cover5.1
volatility0.0
put call8.1
implied vol3.6
max pain risk3.0
beta5.3
debt equity8.1
  • Above max pain $80
  • Concentration risks: 1 HIGH (10-K Item 1A — sized via position_sizing, validated via buy_confidence)

Catalyst

6.5/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
erm1.0
earnings history10.0
earnings timing5.0
surprise avg10.0
  • Estimates down -15.0% (30d)
  • Perfect beat streak: 4Q

How the verdict was assembled

Engine trigger

Multiple concerning factors. Consider reducing position.

Engine technical detail
verdict_path: L4:PATH_F_SELL
Passed (6)
  • INSIDER:OK
  • 8K:CLEAN
  • NEWS_EVENTS:NONE_RECENT
  • EARNINGS_PROXIMITY:33d clear
  • SEMI_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
  • MATERIALS_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
Failed (2)
  • MOMENTUM:2.9<4.5
  • ASYMMETRY:-1.7=NEGATIVE
Warning (0)

none

Reward-to-Risk
-1.71
Upside
-17.4%
Downside
10.1%
Sizing output
AVOID

SetupUNKNOWN No clear chart pattern; technical signals are mixed

EdgeNO_EDGE No clear edge identified

SuitabilityAGGRESSIVE Beta 1.43>1.3

Investment implication

The F-path SELL output reflects an overall score of 4.2 below the 5.6 soft trigger — multiple weakening dimensions accumulated rather than a single hard-floor breach. The strongest dimension ( Technical at 7.1) was not enough to lift the adjusted overall above the threshold. Co-occurring failed gates ( MOMENTUM:2.9<4.5, ASYMMETRY:-1.7=NEGATIVE) reinforce the read. Current asymmetry R:R is -1.71 — supplementary context, not the trigger for this path.

The strongest dimensions are Technical at 7.1, Catalyst at 6.5, and Value at 6.3; the weakest are Growth at 0.9, Momentum at 2.9, and Insider at 3.0. The V9 engine flagged 2 failed gates, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of -1.71 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.

What would invalidate the thesis

Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.

  • P1With approximately 50% of revenue concentrated in Apple Inc. as disclosed in the 10-K, any shift in Apple's supply chain decisions, product mix changes, or component sourcing strategy poses an existential revenue risk to Qorvo's top line.

    Trip ifRevenue concentration from a single customer exceeds 55% in any reported annual period.

  • P2Qorvo converts 164% of net income into free cash flow, indicating that capital expenditures and working capital are well-managed and that reported earnings significantly understate actual cash returns to shareholders.

    Trip ifFree cash flow conversion falls below 100% of net income in any reported period.

  • P3At $101.28 per share, the stock trades above its near-term resistance target of $107.30, producing only 5.9% upside to that level and a reward-to-risk ratio of 0.84 — well below the 1.5 minimum threshold needed to justify new entry.

    Trip ifThe stock price rises above $115, extending the overshoot beyond analyst targets by more than 10%.

  • P4Earnings estimates have fallen -15% over the past 30 days, and the most recent quarter saw a -53.7% negative earnings surprise against an estimate of $0.69, reversing the prior trend of strong beats.

    Trip ifEarnings estimates decline by more than 20% in any single 30-day window.

Engine reasoning is mechanically derived from pipeline gate outputs. See decision view.

Home Stocks QRVO Why this verdict