Skip to main content
NYTNew York Times Company (The)Sell5.9·$70.50-1.01%
NYT · Why this verdict

Why New York Times Company (The) (NYT) is rated SELL

Updated

Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Show full disclosure ▾

About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.

Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.

Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.

No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.

No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.

Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.

Methodology · Editorial policy & full disclaimer

VerdictSELL
Overall score5.9/10
ConfidenceMEDIUM
MacroNEUTRAL
TrendMatrix Research · core thesis

Engine thesis — one sentence

The New York Times Company demonstrates a high-quality business with a Piotroski F-Score of 8/9, strong earnings growth, and three recent beats, but the stock currently trades at or above its analyst price target with essentially no near-term upside, requiring patience for a pullback to create a meaningful entry.

Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.

Thesis pillars

A PEG ratio of 0.29 signals that the market may be underpricing earnings growth relative to the forward P/E of 23.1x, suggesting that subscriber-driven earnings expansion is not fully reflected in current valuation multiples.

Stable
Valuation breakdown
Expectation
Forward P/E expands above 26x over the next 12 months as earnings growth is recognized, creating upside from multiple expansion rather than purely from earnings growth.

CounterPublishing sector PEG ratios tend to be permanently compressed due to secular digital transformation risks; a 0.29 PEG may simply reflect the market's structural skepticism about long-term growth durability.

A Piotroski F-Score of 8 out of 9 combined with above-average returns on assets and equity indicates that the business is generating solid profitability across multiple financial health dimensions, reflecting disciplined capital management.

Stable
Quality breakdown
Expectation
Piotroski F-Score remains at 7 or above over the next 12 months, confirming sustained financial health across profitability, leverage, and operating efficiency.

CounterStrong current F-Scores in media companies can mask the long-term structural challenge of monetizing digital audiences profitably as print advertising revenues decline permanently.

Three earnings beats in the last four quarters with an average positive surprise of 12.5%, including a 30.2% beat in the most recent quarter, demonstrates that the company's digital subscription growth is translating into better-than-expected earnings power.

Stable
Earnings
Expectation
Earnings beat rate stays at 3 or more out of the next 4 quarters and average positive surprise remains above 8%.

CounterThe single miss quarter at minus 3.7% surprise shows that quarters where digital subscriber growth slows can quickly bring earnings back in line or below consensus, limiting the reliability of the beat pattern.

With the stock essentially at its analyst price target and upside of only 0.1%, new buyers are taking on entry risk with minimal near-term reward, and leverage at 2.4x debt-to-equity creates additional sensitivity to interest rate changes.

Stable
Bear case
Expectation
A pullback of at least 7% from current levels creates a more favorable entry with meaningful upside to the next analyst target above $80.

CounterStocks at analyst targets can continue higher if analysts raise targets driven by subscriber growth beats; the 0.1% gap may not be the relevant metric if the target itself is stale.

Per-dimension breakdown

Value

5.7/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
P/E4.3
P/S7.6
EV/EBITDA0.0
Fwd P/E5.8
PEG10.0
Analyst target5.0
  • Forward P/E: 22.3x
  • PEG: 0.28

Quality

6.7/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
ROE6.6
ROA6.8
Gross margin6.1
Op margin5.3
Net margin6.7
Current ratio5.8
FCF quality7.1
Moat6.9
Piotroski F8.9
  • Strong Piotroski F-Score: 8/9

Growth

7.8/10data confidence 67%
ComponentSub-score
Rev growth5.5
EPS growth10.0

Momentum

2.7/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
RSI8.2
MACD0.2
OBV1.0
MA position4.0
Volume0.0
  • Uptrend pullback (RSI 33) - buy opportunity
  • Volume distribution (falling OBV)
  • Above 200-day MA

Sentiment

5.3/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
LLM sentiment3.5
Analyst rating5.0
Price target7.7
  • Analyst upside: 20%

Insider

5.1/10data confidence 50%
ComponentSub-score
materiality5.0
holder change5.2
  • Insider selling (low materiality) — $2,071,412 (0.018% of mkt cap)

Peer rank

4.4/10data confidence 80%
ComponentSub-score
value rank0.0
quality rank5.0
growth rank7.5

Technical

8.6/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
bollinger10.0
support resistance9.7
52w position6.2

Risk (lower is worse)

6.3/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
short interest6.3
days to cover4.7
volatility6.1
put call10.0
implied vol6.5
max pain risk7.0
beta7.4
debt equity2.6
news risk6.0

Catalyst

6.8/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
erm5.0
earnings history10.0
earnings timing5.0
surprise avg9.4
dividend safety6.5
news activity5.0
  • Perfect beat streak: 4Q
  • Dividend: 129.0%

How the verdict was assembled

Engine trigger

Multiple concerning factors. Consider reducing position.

Engine technical detail
verdict_path: L4:PATH_F_SELL
Passed (5)
  • INSIDER:OK
  • 8K:CLEAN
  • EARNINGS_PROXIMITY:41d clear
  • SEMI_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
  • MATERIALS_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
Failed (2)
  • MOMENTUM:2.7<4.5
  • ASYMMETRY:0.9<1.5@spot
Warning (0)

none

Reward-to-Risk
0.89
Upside
+4.5%
Downside
5.1%
Sizing output
AVOID

SetupUNKNOWN No clear chart pattern; technical signals are mixed

EdgeNO_EDGE No clear edge identified

SuitabilityMODERATE Balanced profile

Investment implication

The F-path SELL output reflects an overall score of 4.4 below the 5.6 soft trigger — multiple weakening dimensions accumulated rather than a single hard-floor breach. The strongest dimension ( Technical at 8.6) was not enough to lift the adjusted overall above the threshold. Co-occurring failed gates ( MOMENTUM:2.7<4.5, ASYMMETRY:0.9<1.5@spot) reinforce the read. Current asymmetry R:R is 0.89 — supplementary context, not the trigger for this path.

The strongest dimensions are Technical at 8.6, Growth at 7.8, and Catalyst at 6.8; the weakest are Momentum at 2.7, Peer rank at 4.4, and Insider at 5.1. The V9 engine flagged 2 failed gates, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of 0.89 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.

What would invalidate the thesis

Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.

  • P1A Piotroski F-Score of 8 out of 9 combined with above-average returns on assets and equity indicates that the business is generating solid profitability across multiple financial health dimensions, reflecting disciplined capital management.

    Trip ifPiotroski F-Score drops below 6 in any reported quarter.

  • P2Three earnings beats in the last four quarters with an average positive surprise of 12.5%, including a 30.2% beat in the most recent quarter, demonstrates that the company's digital subscription growth is translating into better-than-expected earnings power.

    Trip ifEarnings surprise falls below 0% in at least 2 of the next 4 quarters.

  • P3A PEG ratio of 0.29 signals that the market may be underpricing earnings growth relative to the forward P/E of 23.1x, suggesting that subscriber-driven earnings expansion is not fully reflected in current valuation multiples.

    Trip ifForward P/E compresses below 18x without a reduction in earnings growth expectations below 10%.

  • P4With the stock essentially at its analyst price target and upside of only 0.1%, new buyers are taking on entry risk with minimal near-term reward, and leverage at 2.4x debt-to-equity creates additional sensitivity to interest rate changes.

    Trip ifPrice drops below $65 and analyst price target is reduced by more than 10%.

Engine reasoning is mechanically derived from pipeline gate outputs. See decision view.

Home Stocks NYT Why this verdict