Value
7.7/10data confidence 83%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/S | 10.0 |
| EV/EBITDA | 6.1 |
| Fwd P/E | 9.6 |
| PEG | 10.0 |
| Analyst target | 3.0 |
- ▸Forward P/E: 7.7x
- ▸PEG: 0.04
- ▸Attractively valued
NWL · Why this verdict
Why Newell Brands (NWL) is rated SELL
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Show full disclosure ▾Hide full disclosure ▴
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
VerdictSELL
Overall score4.8/10
ConfidenceMEDIUM
MacroNEUTRAL
TrendMatrix Research · core thesis
Engine thesis — one sentence
Newell Brands trades at an attractive forward P/E of 7.1x with a PEG of 0.04, but carries an 18% short interest, a put/call ratio of 5.25, a quality score of 2.2/10 with no competitive moat, and an overbought RSI of 75 in the context of a death cross recovery, creating a high-risk environment.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
Thesis pillars
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
Newell Brands trades at a forward P/E of 7.1x with a PEG of 0.04 and is described as attractively valued, but a quality score of 2.2/10 and no competitive moat indicate that the low valuation reflects genuine business quality risk rather than a market mispricing. Valuation breakdown | Operating margin improves above 8% within 4 quarters, demonstrating that cost restructuring is improving the quality profile to justify a higher valuation. | →Stable |
| CounterConsumer staples brands with strong legacy names and distribution scale can earn returns above cost of capital without a traditional moat score, and the company may be undervalued on a sum-of-parts basis if its brand portfolio has real asset value. | ||
With 18% of the float sold short and a put/call ratio of 5.25 — one of the most bearish options configurations in the screening universe — sophisticated investors have placed heavy bets on further price deterioration, which creates persistent downward pressure. Key risks | Short interest falls below 12% and put/call ratio falls below 2.0 within 6 months as the bear thesis weakens. | →Stable |
| CounterExtreme short positioning and a high put/call ratio can reverse sharply if the company delivers positive news, and the mean-reversion trade from an overcrowded short position has historically been one of the highest-return setups in the market. | ||
Despite the death cross formation and ongoing quality concerns, the RSI reached 75, signaling overbought conditions in a stock with weak underlying fundamentals, which historically precedes a near-term pullback to more sustainable technical levels. Momentum breakdown | RSI falls below 60 within 30 trading days as the overbought condition normalizes, with price declining less than 10% from current levels during the reset. | →Stable |
| CounterIn a momentum-driven recovery setup with improving MACD, an overbought RSI can persist for several months before reverting, and short-covering from the 18% short interest could keep momentum elevated. | ||
Revenue declined 1% year-over-year and the quality score of 2.2/10 reflects concerns across profitability, leverage, and moat, meaning the business lacks the operational strength needed to sustain a recovery from elevated debt levels. Quality breakdown | Revenue growth turns positive above 3% year-over-year within 2 quarters, demonstrating that the top-line is stabilizing. | →Stable |
| CounterA 1% revenue decline is mild and may reflect a deliberate portfolio rationalization strategy, and the company has recently beaten earnings in the most recent quarter, suggesting operational progress despite the revenue headwind. | ||
Newell Brands trades at a forward P/E of 7.1x with a PEG of 0.04 and is described as attractively valued, but a quality score of 2.2/10 and no competitive moat indicate that the low valuation reflects genuine business quality risk rather than a market mispricing.
→StableValuation breakdown
- Expectation
- Operating margin improves above 8% within 4 quarters, demonstrating that cost restructuring is improving the quality profile to justify a higher valuation.
CounterConsumer staples brands with strong legacy names and distribution scale can earn returns above cost of capital without a traditional moat score, and the company may be undervalued on a sum-of-parts basis if its brand portfolio has real asset value.
With 18% of the float sold short and a put/call ratio of 5.25 — one of the most bearish options configurations in the screening universe — sophisticated investors have placed heavy bets on further price deterioration, which creates persistent downward pressure.
→StableKey risks
- Expectation
- Short interest falls below 12% and put/call ratio falls below 2.0 within 6 months as the bear thesis weakens.
CounterExtreme short positioning and a high put/call ratio can reverse sharply if the company delivers positive news, and the mean-reversion trade from an overcrowded short position has historically been one of the highest-return setups in the market.
Despite the death cross formation and ongoing quality concerns, the RSI reached 75, signaling overbought conditions in a stock with weak underlying fundamentals, which historically precedes a near-term pullback to more sustainable technical levels.
→StableMomentum breakdown
- Expectation
- RSI falls below 60 within 30 trading days as the overbought condition normalizes, with price declining less than 10% from current levels during the reset.
CounterIn a momentum-driven recovery setup with improving MACD, an overbought RSI can persist for several months before reverting, and short-covering from the 18% short interest could keep momentum elevated.
Revenue declined 1% year-over-year and the quality score of 2.2/10 reflects concerns across profitability, leverage, and moat, meaning the business lacks the operational strength needed to sustain a recovery from elevated debt levels.
→StableQuality breakdown
- Expectation
- Revenue growth turns positive above 3% year-over-year within 2 quarters, demonstrating that the top-line is stabilizing.
CounterA 1% revenue decline is mild and may reflect a deliberate portfolio rationalization strategy, and the company has recently beaten earnings in the most recent quarter, suggesting operational progress despite the revenue headwind.
Per-dimension breakdown
Quality
2.2/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 0.0 |
| ROA | 1.8 |
| Gross margin | 2.8 |
| Op margin | 1.1 |
| Net margin | 0.0 |
| Current ratio | 4.1 |
| Moat | 2.5 |
| Piotroski F | 5.6 |
- ▸No competitive moat
- ▸Quality concerns
Growth
6.1/10data confidence 67%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 2.2 |
| EPS growth | 10.0 |
- ▸Declining revenue: -1%
Momentum
6.6/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 3.6 |
| MACD | 9.0 |
| OBV | 10.0 |
| MA position | 7.5 |
| Volume | 3.1 |
- ▸Overbought (RSI 87)
- ▸Volume accumulation (rising OBV)
- ▸Above 200-MA but MA slope flat/negative + RSI 87 (late-cycle distribution risk)
Sentiment
4.0/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| LLM sentiment | 3.4 |
| Analyst rating | 5.0 |
| Price target | 3.5 |
- ▸LLM news sentiment: -0.33 (n=1)
- ▸Below analyst target
Insider
3.9/10data confidence 75%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| materiality | 4.5 |
| insider conviction | 2.0 |
| holder change | 5.1 |
- ▸Modest insider selling — $1,259,582 (0.058% of mkt cap)
Peer rank
3.8/10data confidence 80%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 8.5 |
| quality rank | 0.8 |
| growth rank | 0.8 |
Technical
2.8/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 0.7 |
| support resistance | 0.1 |
| 52w position | 7.5 |
Risk (lower is worse)
2.4/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 1.7 |
| days to cover | 4.0 |
| volatility | 0.0 |
| put call | 0.0 |
| implied vol | 1.7 |
| beta | 7.0 |
| debt equity | 2.6 |
- ▸High short interest justified: 18%
- ▸Elevated put/call: 6.91
- ▸High IV: 70%
Catalyst
5.8/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 3.5 |
| earnings history | 10.0 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 6.9 |
| dividend safety | 4.2 |
| news activity | 5.0 |
- ▸Yield trap warning: high yield but unsafe
How the verdict was assembled
Engine trigger
Quality below minimum threshold.
Engine technical detail
verdict_path:
L1:HARD_BLOCKPassed (7)
- MOMENTUM:6.6>=5.5
- INSIDER:OK
- 8K:CLEAN
- NEWS_EVENTS:NONE_RECENT
- EARNINGS_PROXIMITY:37d clear
- SEMI_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
- MATERIALS_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
Failed (1)
- ASYMMETRY:-1.5=NEGATIVE
Warning (0)
none
Reward-to-Risk
-1.47
Upside
-22.0%
Downside
15.0%
Sizing output
AVOID
SetupUNKNOWN — No clear chart pattern; technical signals are mixed
EdgeNO_EDGE — No clear edge identified
SuitabilityAGGRESSIVE — MCap $2.2B<$5B
Investment implication
The L1 gate blocked the positive-verdict path: a hard-floor threshold was breached, so dimensional pillars — including Value at 7.7 could not lift the engine output above the verdict floor. Failed gate signal: ASYMMETRY:-1.5=NEGATIVE.
The strongest dimensions are Value at 7.7, Momentum at 6.6, and Growth at 6.1; the weakest are Quality at 2.2, Risk (lower is worse) at 2.4, and Technical at 2.8. The V9 engine flagged 1 failed gate, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of -1.47 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
What would invalidate the thesis
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
- P1Newell Brands trades at a forward P/E of 7.1x with a PEG of 0.04 and is described as attractively valued, but a quality score of 2.2/10 and no competitive moat indicate that the low valuation reflects genuine business quality risk rather than a market mispricing.
Trip ifOperating margin falls below 5% for 2 consecutive quarters.
- P2With 18% of the float sold short and a put/call ratio of 5.25 — one of the most bearish options configurations in the screening universe — sophisticated investors have placed heavy bets on further price deterioration, which creates persistent downward pressure.
Trip ifShort interest rises above 25% or put/call ratio rises above 7.0.
- P3Despite the death cross formation and ongoing quality concerns, the RSI reached 75, signaling overbought conditions in a stock with weak underlying fundamentals, which historically precedes a near-term pullback to more sustainable technical levels.
Trip ifRSI rises above 80 while on-balance volume falls, indicating distribution at overbought levels.
- P4Revenue declined 1% year-over-year and the quality score of 2.2/10 reflects concerns across profitability, leverage, and moat, meaning the business lacks the operational strength needed to sustain a recovery from elevated debt levels.
Trip ifRevenue declines by more than 5% year-over-year for 2 consecutive quarters.