Value
7.7/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 8.5 |
| P/S | 7.5 |
| EV/EBITDA | 8.1 |
| Fwd P/E | 9.5 |
| PEG | 3.8 |
| Analyst target | 9.0 |
- ▸Forward P/E: 8.6x
- ▸PEG: 2.78
- ▸Attractively valued
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
Newmont Corporation is a best-in-class gold miner with a perfect Piotroski F-Score of 9 out of 9, Rule of 40 score of 85, wide economic moat, 26% return on equity, 46% revenue growth, and a 4-quarter perfect earnings beat streak averaging 24.9% positive surprise — making it one of the highest-conviction quality-growth combinations in the materials sector — though concentrated gold exposure at 85% of revenue ties the thesis to commodity price direction.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
With 85% of revenue derived from gold, Newmont's financial performance is substantially determined by a single commodity whose price is driven by macroeconomic factors including inflation expectations, real interest rates, and dollar strength — all outside management's control. Bear case | Gold price remains above $2,000 per ounce for the next 12 months, supporting the revenue and earnings base that underlies the current valuation. | →Stable |
| CounterGold concentration in a gold mining company is a feature, not a bug — diversification into lower-quality metals would dilute the margins and moat that make Newmont the highest-conviction play on gold. | ||
Analysts see 34% upside to the current price, the stock trades at a forward P/E of 9.3x with 46% revenue growth, and the risk-reward ratio is 3.47 with 24% upside versus 7% downside — placing Newmont among the more attractively valued high-quality companies in the entire coverage universe. Sentiment breakdown | The stock closes at least 15% of the gap to analyst consensus price targets within 12 months as the quality and growth profile receives broader recognition. | →Stable |
| CounterAn elevated put-to-call ratio of 2.39 indicates that options traders are positioned more bearishly than the analyst community, suggesting hedgers see meaningful downside risk that consensus targets do not fully incorporate. | ||
Newmont scores 9 out of 9 on the Piotroski F-Score, achieves a Rule of 40 of 85 — a rare elite threshold — maintains a 26% return on equity, and holds a wide economic moat, establishing it as a genuine compounder within the gold mining sector with durable operational advantages over peers. Quality breakdown | Quality score remains above 9.0 and Piotroski F-Score holds at 9 for the next 2 consecutive quarterly assessments. | →Stable |
| CounterGold mining returns are highly leveraged to the gold price; a sustained decline in the commodity price would compress ROE and margins regardless of the company's operational quality, making the high Piotroski score partly cyclical. | ||
Newmont has beaten consensus EPS estimates in all 4 recent quarters with an average positive surprise of 24.9%, including beats of 33.5%, 24.3%, 18.8%, and 22.9% — indicating conservative guidance, strong operational execution, and management credibility. Earnings | The company beats consensus EPS estimates in at least 3 of the next 4 quarterly reports, sustaining the track record. | →Stable |
| CounterLarge positive earnings surprises in gold mining often reflect unexpected gold price appreciation rather than operational outperformance; if the gold price stabilizes, the surprise magnitude may revert to a smaller range. | ||
CounterGold concentration in a gold mining company is a feature, not a bug — diversification into lower-quality metals would dilute the margins and moat that make Newmont the highest-conviction play on gold.
CounterAn elevated put-to-call ratio of 2.39 indicates that options traders are positioned more bearishly than the analyst community, suggesting hedgers see meaningful downside risk that consensus targets do not fully incorporate.
CounterGold mining returns are highly leveraged to the gold price; a sustained decline in the commodity price would compress ROE and margins regardless of the company's operational quality, making the high Piotroski score partly cyclical.
CounterLarge positive earnings surprises in gold mining often reflect unexpected gold price appreciation rather than operational outperformance; if the gold price stabilizes, the surprise magnitude may revert to a smaller range.
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 8.5 |
| P/S | 7.5 |
| EV/EBITDA | 8.1 |
| Fwd P/E | 9.5 |
| PEG | 3.8 |
| Analyst target | 9.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 8.6 |
| ROA | 9.9 |
| Gross margin | 9.5 |
| Op margin | 10.0 |
| Net margin | 10.0 |
| Current ratio | 8.3 |
| FCF quality | 7.8 |
| Moat | 9.0 |
| Rule of 40 | 9.5 |
| Piotroski F | 10.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 10.0 |
| EPS growth | 10.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 3.5 |
| MACD | 0.0 |
| OBV | 1.0 |
| MA position | 2.2 |
| Volume | 4.6 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Analyst rating | 7.5 |
| Price target | 9.5 |
| erm sentiment | 5.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| materiality | 5.0 |
| holder change | 5.1 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 4.4 |
| quality rank | 6.2 |
| growth rank | 1.1 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 9.2 |
| support resistance | 9.0 |
| 52w position | 4.0 |
| gap | 7.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 9.0 |
| days to cover | 8.1 |
| volatility | 0.0 |
| put call | 4.6 |
| implied vol | 3.9 |
| beta | 10.0 |
| debt equity | 9.4 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 5.0 |
| earnings history | 10.0 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 10.0 |
| dividend safety | 5.2 |
Wide-moat business. Accumulate on weakness.
L4:PATH_E_WIDE_MOAT|ENTRY_STICKY:PRIOR_STILL_VIABLESetupUNKNOWN — No clear chart pattern; technical signals are mixed
EdgeTEMP_HEADWIND — High quality (9.3) with weak momentum (2.3)
SuitabilityCONSERVATIVE — Beta 0.46<0.8, Div 106.0%, Q=9.3
The STRONG_BUY_WAIT verdict reflects the MOMENTUM gate's 2.3<4.5 outcome against Growth at 10.0 and asymmetric R:R of 3.10.
The strongest dimensions are Growth at 10.0, Quality at 9.3, and Value at 7.7; the weakest are Momentum at 2.3, Peer rank at 2.9, and Insider at 5.0. The V9 engine flagged 1 failed gate with 1 warning, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of 3.10 and an engine sizing output of STARTER.
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
Trip ifQuality score falls below 8.5 or Piotroski F-Score drops below 8 for 2 consecutive quarters.
Trip ifThe company misses consensus EPS estimates by more than 10% in 2 of the next 4 quarterly reports.
Trip ifGold price falls below $1,800 per ounce and sustains that level for more than 60 days.
Trip ifAnalyst consensus price target declines more than 15% from current levels or put-to-call ratio rises above 3.5.