Value
9.0/10data confidence 67%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 8.3 |
| P/S | 9.9 |
| EV/EBITDA | 4.8 |
| Fwd P/E | 9.9 |
- ▸Forward P/E: 5.6x
- ▸Attractively valued
LEN-B · Why this verdict
Why Lennar (LEN-B) is rated SELL
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Show full disclosure ▾Hide full disclosure ▴
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
VerdictSELL
Overall score4.3/10
ConfidenceMEDIUM
MacroNEUTRAL
TrendMatrix Research · core thesis
Engine thesis — one sentence
The Class B shares of this residential homebuilder face a hard technical block from a death cross, momentum at the floor of acceptable levels, and no upside remaining to the near-term target — the setup is structurally unfavorable and the quality profile falls short of investment-grade thresholds.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
Thesis pillars
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
Operating margin, net margin, and return on equity are all below the quality floor required for a position, with no identifiable competitive moat — characteristics that limit the business's ability to defend profitability through an adverse housing cycle. Quality breakdown | Quality improves if operating margin rises above 5% and return on assets exceeds 4% for 2 consecutive quarters. | →Stable |
| CounterAt a cyclical trough, thin margins are a common feature of homebuilders rather than a structural deficiency; a housing recovery can restore margins quickly given the largely variable cost structure of construction. | ||
The dividend payout ratio is 227% of earnings, meaning the current dividend distribution substantially exceeds the company's net income — a condition that cannot persist without either a dividend reduction or incremental borrowing to fund the shortfall. Catalyst breakdown | Dividend sustainability improves if the payout ratio compresses below 100% as earnings recover over the next 4 quarters. | →Stable |
| CounterIf management views the payout as a commitment to return capital through the trough, the company may choose to maintain it by drawing on existing liquidity rather than cutting, preserving the income appeal of the shares. | ||
The stock has formed a death cross — the 50-day moving average crossing below the 200-day — with the longer-term trend declining roughly 4% over 30 days and on-balance volume falling, confirming that sellers are in control at the current price level. Engine gate (failed) | The downtrend thesis is falsified if the 50-day moving average crosses back above the 200-day and price holds above that crossover for 4 consecutive weeks. | →Stable |
| CounterThe MACD is showing early signs of improvement and the RSI sits at a neutral 51, suggesting the rate of deterioration may be slowing even if the cross has not yet reversed. | ||
With zero percent upside to the near-term price target and a reward-to-risk ratio of 0.6-to-1, the current price already prices in the near-term recovery scenario — buyers are accepting substantially more downside risk than potential gain. Price targets | A new entry case emerges only if the price corrects to a level that restores at least 10% upside to a refreshed resistance target. | →Stable |
| CounterThe forward earnings multiple near 5x is among the cheapest in the sector; if housing demand stabilizes, multiple expansion alone could generate meaningful returns without requiring earnings growth. | ||
Operating margin, net margin, and return on equity are all below the quality floor required for a position, with no identifiable competitive moat — characteristics that limit the business's ability to defend profitability through an adverse housing cycle.
→StableQuality breakdown
- Expectation
- Quality improves if operating margin rises above 5% and return on assets exceeds 4% for 2 consecutive quarters.
CounterAt a cyclical trough, thin margins are a common feature of homebuilders rather than a structural deficiency; a housing recovery can restore margins quickly given the largely variable cost structure of construction.
The dividend payout ratio is 227% of earnings, meaning the current dividend distribution substantially exceeds the company's net income — a condition that cannot persist without either a dividend reduction or incremental borrowing to fund the shortfall.
→StableCatalyst breakdown
- Expectation
- Dividend sustainability improves if the payout ratio compresses below 100% as earnings recover over the next 4 quarters.
CounterIf management views the payout as a commitment to return capital through the trough, the company may choose to maintain it by drawing on existing liquidity rather than cutting, preserving the income appeal of the shares.
The stock has formed a death cross — the 50-day moving average crossing below the 200-day — with the longer-term trend declining roughly 4% over 30 days and on-balance volume falling, confirming that sellers are in control at the current price level.
→StableEngine gate (failed)
- Expectation
- The downtrend thesis is falsified if the 50-day moving average crosses back above the 200-day and price holds above that crossover for 4 consecutive weeks.
CounterThe MACD is showing early signs of improvement and the RSI sits at a neutral 51, suggesting the rate of deterioration may be slowing even if the cross has not yet reversed.
With zero percent upside to the near-term price target and a reward-to-risk ratio of 0.6-to-1, the current price already prices in the near-term recovery scenario — buyers are accepting substantially more downside risk than potential gain.
→StablePrice targets
- Expectation
- A new entry case emerges only if the price corrects to a level that restores at least 10% upside to a refreshed resistance target.
CounterThe forward earnings multiple near 5x is among the cheapest in the sector; if housing demand stabilizes, multiple expansion alone could generate meaningful returns without requiring earnings growth.
Per-dimension breakdown
Quality
3.0/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 2.5 |
| ROA | 2.6 |
| Gross margin | 0.0 |
| Op margin | 2.1 |
| Net margin | 2.5 |
| Current ratio | 5.0 |
| Moat | 4.6 |
| Piotroski F | 4.4 |
- ▸No competitive moat
- ▸Quality concerns
Growth
0.6/10data confidence 67%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 1.2 |
| EPS growth | 0.0 |
- ▸Declining revenue: -5%
Momentum
4.3/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 4.5 |
| MACD | 10.0 |
| OBV | 1.0 |
| MA position | 6.0 |
| Volume | 0.0 |
- ▸Volume distribution (falling OBV)
- ▸Below 200-MA, MA slope -4.6%/30d — confirmed downtrend
Sentiment
5.0/10data confidence 67%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Analyst rating | 5.0 |
| erm sentiment | 5.0 |
Insider
5.0/10data confidence 50%Peer rank
3.2/10data confidence 80%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 6.6 |
| quality rank | 0.6 |
| growth rank | 5.6 |
Technical
1.6/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 0.1 |
| support resistance | 1.0 |
| 52w position | 3.7 |
Risk (lower is worse)
6.1/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 8.3 |
| days to cover | 4.6 |
| volatility | 3.3 |
| beta | 5.4 |
| debt equity | 8.9 |
Catalyst
5.5/10data confidence 50%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 4.0 |
| dividend safety | 7.0 |
- ▸Dividend: 219.0%
How the verdict was assembled
Engine trigger
Quality below minimum threshold.
Engine technical detail
verdict_path:
L1:HARD_BLOCKPassed (5)
- INSIDER:OK
- NEWS_EVENTS:NONE_RECENT
- EARNINGS_PROXIMITY:NO_DATE
- SEMI_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
- MATERIALS_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
Failed (2)
- MOMENTUM:4.3<4.5
- DEATH_CROSS:HARD_BLOCK
Warning (2)
- ASYMMETRY:UPSIDE_EXHAUSTED (upside=0.0%)
- 8K_CSUITE_CHANGE:5.02 (officer departure/appointment)
Reward-to-Risk
0.00
Upside
+0.0%
Downside
9.2%
Sizing output
AVOID
SetupRECOVERY — Death cross but MACD improving, RSI 55
EdgeNO_EDGE — No clear edge identified
SuitabilityAGGRESSIVE — Beta 1.40>1.3
Investment implication
The L1 gate blocked the positive-verdict path: a hard-floor threshold was breached, so dimensional pillars — including Value at 9.0 could not lift the engine output above the verdict floor. Failed gate signal: MOMENTUM:4.3<4.5.
The strongest dimensions are Value at 9.0, Risk (lower is worse) at 6.1, and Catalyst at 5.5; the weakest are Growth at 0.6, Technical at 1.6, and Quality at 3.0. The V9 engine flagged 2 failed gates with 2 warnings, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of 0.00 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
What would invalidate the thesis
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
- P1The stock has formed a death cross — the 50-day moving average crossing below the 200-day — with the longer-term trend declining roughly 4% over 30 days and on-balance volume falling, confirming that sellers are in control at the current price level.
Trip if50-day moving average crosses back above the 200-day moving average and price holds above that level for 4 consecutive weeks.
- P2With zero percent upside to the near-term price target and a reward-to-risk ratio of 0.6-to-1, the current price already prices in the near-term recovery scenario — buyers are accepting substantially more downside risk than potential gain.
Trip ifUpside to the near-term resistance target rises above 10% based on a refreshed price-target calculation.
- P3Operating margin, net margin, and return on equity are all below the quality floor required for a position, with no identifiable competitive moat — characteristics that limit the business's ability to defend profitability through an adverse housing cycle.
Trip ifReturn on assets rises above 4% for 2 consecutive quarters.
- P4The dividend payout ratio is 227% of earnings, meaning the current dividend distribution substantially exceeds the company's net income — a condition that cannot persist without either a dividend reduction or incremental borrowing to fund the shortfall.
Trip ifDividend payout ratio compresses below 100% for 2 consecutive quarters.