Skip to main content
ICFIICF International, Inc.Sell5.5·$68.11+0.32%
ICFI · Why this verdict

Why ICF International (ICFI) is rated SELL

Updated

Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Show full disclosure ▾

About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.

Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.

Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.

No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.

No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.

Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.

Methodology · Editorial policy & full disclaimer

VerdictSELL
Overall score5.5/10
ConfidenceMEDIUM
MacroNEUTRAL
TrendMatrix Research · core thesis

Engine thesis — one sentence

A forward earnings multiple of 9.4x and a PEG ratio of 0.14 frame an inexpensive consulting business with 24% upside to analyst targets, but three consecutive quarters of earnings misses and a 10% revenue contraction suggest the valuation discount reflects genuine operational deterioration rather than temporary mispricing.

Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.

Thesis pillars

Revenue declined approximately 10% year-over-year, signaling that consulting demand conditions or the company's competitive positioning have meaningfully weakened, limiting the operating leverage available to improve margins from current low levels.

Stable
Growth breakdown
Expectation
Year-over-year revenue growth turns positive — above 0% — in the next reported quarter, indicating the contraction has reached a bottom.

CounterVolume accumulation visible in rising on-balance volume and an improving MACD suggest that market participants may be positioning for a business inflection ahead of what the trailing revenue data currently shows.

At a forward P/E of 9.4x and a PEG ratio of 0.14, the stock screens as attractively valued relative to its earnings growth profile, with analyst consensus projecting roughly 24% upside to the $89.46 price target and a risk/reward ratio of approximately 3.6-to-1.

Stable
Valuation breakdown
Expectation
The stock closes at least 15% of the gap to its $89.46 analyst target over the next 12 months as the valuation discount narrows toward peer multiples.

CounterA low multiple with a 0.14 PEG is appealing in isolation, but three consecutive earnings misses and contracting revenue suggest the earnings denominator may be declining — which would push the effective forward multiple higher and make the current price appear less inexpensive than it screens.

The three most recent quarters produced earnings misses of -3.2%, -1.5%, and -3.7% respectively, establishing a consecutive miss pattern that indicates the business is consistently delivering below analyst expectations.

Stable
Earnings
Expectation
The next quarterly report delivers a positive earnings surprise above 3%, breaking the miss streak and signaling an operational reset.

CounterThe magnitude of each miss is modest — less than 4% — suggesting these may reflect minor execution variability rather than structural deterioration; the single prior beat of +5.2% demonstrated the business can outperform when conditions align.

A put/call ratio of 2.50 — well above neutral — indicates that options market participants are positioned bearishly, implying significant institutional skepticism about the near-term outlook and creating a technical overhang on the stock.

Stable
Risk breakdown
Expectation
Put/call ratio falls below 1.5 within two quarters, reflecting a reduction in hedging pressure as the fundamental picture clarifies.

CounterElevated put/call ratios in smaller-capitalization names can sometimes represent hedging by existing long holders rather than outright short bets; if the company begins to beat estimates, put holders may exit rapidly, providing a technical tailwind.

Per-dimension breakdown

Value

8.9/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
P/E8.1
P/S9.9
EV/EBITDA6.3
Fwd P/E9.5
PEG10.0
Analyst target9.0
  • Forward P/E: 8.8x
  • PEG: 0.13
  • Attractively valued

Quality

4.4/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
ROE2.8
ROA2.9
Gross margin3.4
Op margin3.2
Net margin2.3
Current ratio5.4
FCF quality7.2
Moat4.6
Piotroski F7.8
  • No competitive moat
  • Strong Piotroski F-Score: 7/9

Growth

5.0/10data confidence 67%
ComponentSub-score
Rev growth0.0
EPS growth10.0
  • Declining revenue: -10%

Momentum

3.1/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
RSI4.5
MACD0.0
OBV10.0
MA position1.0
Volume0.0
  • Volume accumulation (rising OBV)
  • Below 200-MA, MA slope -4.6%/30d — confirmed downtrend

Sentiment

6.5/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
Analyst rating5.0
Price target9.6
erm sentiment5.0
  • Analyst upside: 55%

Insider

6.5/10data confidence 75%
ComponentSub-score
materiality6.5
insider conviction8.0
holder change5.0
  • Modest insider buying — $491,134 (0.040% of mkt cap)

Peer rank

3.0/10data confidence 80%
ComponentSub-score
value rank7.1
quality rank0.0
growth rank0.0

Technical

5.2/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
bollinger6.8
support resistance5.3
52w position3.5

Risk (lower is worse)

7.2/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
short interest8.3
days to cover9.6
volatility3.4
put call6.7
implied vol5.0
beta9.7
debt equity7.5

Catalyst

3.8/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
erm5.0
earnings history0.0
earnings timing5.0
surprise avg2.1
dividend safety7.0
  • Earnings concerns: 1B/3M
  • Dividend: 82.0%

How the verdict was assembled

Engine trigger

Multiple concerning factors. Consider reducing position.

Engine technical detail
verdict_path: L4:PATH_F_SELL
Passed (7)
  • ASYMMETRY:4.2>=1.5
  • INSIDER:OK
  • 8K:CLEAN
  • NEWS_EVENTS:NONE_RECENT
  • EARNINGS_PROXIMITY:42d clear
  • SEMI_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
  • MATERIALS_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
Failed (2)
  • MOMENTUM:3.1<4.5
  • DEATH_CROSS:HARD_BLOCK
Warning (0)

none

Reward-to-Risk
4.19
Upside
+31.4%
Downside
7.5%
Sizing output
AVOID

SetupRANGE_BOUND RSI 48 mid-range, Bollinger mid-band

EdgeNO_EDGE No clear edge identified

SuitabilityAGGRESSIVE MCap $1.2B<$5B

Investment implication

The F-path SELL output reflects an overall score of 5.5 below the 5.6 soft trigger — multiple weakening dimensions accumulated rather than a single hard-floor breach. The strongest dimension ( Value at 8.9) was not enough to lift the adjusted overall above the threshold. Co-occurring failed gates ( MOMENTUM:3.1<4.5, DEATH_CROSS:HARD_BLOCK) reinforce the read. Current asymmetry R:R is 4.19 — supplementary context, not the trigger for this path.

The strongest dimensions are Value at 8.9, Risk (lower is worse) at 7.2, and Sentiment at 6.5; the weakest are Peer rank at 3.0, Momentum at 3.1, and Catalyst at 3.8. The V9 engine flagged 2 failed gates, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of 4.19 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.

What would invalidate the thesis

Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.

  • P1At a forward P/E of 9.4x and a PEG ratio of 0.14, the stock screens as attractively valued relative to its earnings growth profile, with analyst consensus projecting roughly 24% upside to the $89.46 price target and a risk/reward ratio of approximately 3.6-to-1.

    Trip ifForward P/E expands above 15x from the current 9.4x, reducing the stated valuation discount to peers.

  • P2The three most recent quarters produced earnings misses of -3.2%, -1.5%, and -3.7% respectively, establishing a consecutive miss pattern that indicates the business is consistently delivering below analyst expectations.

    Trip ifEPS surprise rises above 3% for 2 consecutive quarters, breaking the miss streak.

  • P3Revenue declined approximately 10% year-over-year, signaling that consulting demand conditions or the company's competitive positioning have meaningfully weakened, limiting the operating leverage available to improve margins from current low levels.

    Trip ifYear-over-year revenue growth exceeds 5% for 2 consecutive quarters, reversing the contraction.

  • P4A put/call ratio of 2.50 — well above neutral — indicates that options market participants are positioned bearishly, implying significant institutional skepticism about the near-term outlook and creating a technical overhang on the stock.

    Trip ifPut/call ratio falls below 1.0 for 2 consecutive months, indicating that bearish hedging pressure has substantially resolved.

Engine reasoning is mechanically derived from pipeline gate outputs. See decision view.

Home Stocks ICFI Why this verdict