Skip to main content
IBKRInteractive Brokers Group, Inc.Sell5.2·$93.34+0.59%
IBKR · Why this verdict

Why Interactive Brokers Group (IBKR) is rated SELL

Updated

Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Show full disclosure ▾

About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.

Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.

Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.

No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.

No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.

Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.

Methodology · Editorial policy & full disclaimer

VerdictSELL
Overall score5.2/10
ConfidenceMEDIUM
MacroNEUTRAL
TrendMatrix Research · core thesis

Engine thesis — one sentence

The business operates a high-quality franchise with a wide economic moat and strong margins, but the stock has effectively reached its resistance target, leaving near-zero upside against meaningful downside — the risk/reward geometry currently does not support new exposure.

Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.

Thesis pillars

At a forward P/E of 32.2 times and a PEG ratio of 2.50, the shares screen expensive, limiting margin of safety if earnings growth decelerates even modestly.

Stable
Valuation breakdown
Expectation
The forward multiple compresses toward 22 times if earnings growth does not materially accelerate, closing the valuation gap to peers.

CounterA franchise with a wide economic moat can sustain a premium multiple for extended periods when earnings momentum remains intact, and the market may continue pricing quality at a premium.

The company demonstrates a wide economic moat, net margins near 16%, and a Piotroski F-Score of 7 out of 9, reflecting a durable competitive position and returns profile that has historically held through different market environments.

Stable
Quality breakdown
Expectation
Operating margin remains above 14% and return on equity stays in double-digit territory over the next four quarters.

CounterLeverage at a debt-to-equity ratio of 1.5 reduces the cushion if market volumes or interest income soften, and franchise quality alone does not shield the share price when valuation is already stretched.

The company delivered an in-line result in the most recent quarter, preceded by three consecutive quarterly beats — with a new report approximately 28 days away that has historically served as a positive catalyst.

Stable
Earnings
Expectation
The upcoming quarterly report produces a positive earnings surprise, resuming outperformance after the most recent in-line print.

CounterThe most recent quarter came in line with consensus rather than ahead, suggesting estimates have caught up to underlying performance and further positive surprises may not materialize.

The stock has reached its technical resistance target, leaving only 0.1% headroom to the upside against approximately 7% potential downside — an asymmetry that has inverted and does not justify initiating or adding to a position at current levels.

Stable
Price targets
Expectation
If the underlying setup remains constructive, the stock breaks decisively above resistance and re-establishes upside headroom of more than 8% to a new target.

CounterHigh-quality compounders in sustained uptrends often pause at prior resistance before continuing higher, making the current level a consolidation point rather than a terminal barrier.

Per-dimension breakdown

Value

2.7/10data confidence 83%
ComponentSub-score
P/E3.0
P/S0.0
Fwd P/E3.5
PEG4.0
Analyst target3.0
  • Forward P/E: 32.3x
  • PEG: 2.56
  • Expensive valuation

Quality

7.2/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
ROE7.9
ROA1.6
Gross margin10.0
Op margin10.0
Net margin8.1
Current ratio4.3
Moat7.5
Piotroski F7.8
  • Strong margins: 16%
  • Wide economic moat
  • Compounder quality: strong returns + growth
  • Strong Piotroski F-Score: 7/9

Growth

6.7/10data confidence 67%
ComponentSub-score
Rev growth6.7
EPS growth6.6

Momentum

5.0/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
RSI5.0
MACD10.0
OBV1.0
MA position9.0
Volume0.0
  • Volume distribution (falling OBV)
  • Above 200-day MA

Sentiment

5.7/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
LLM sentiment7.9
Analyst rating5.0
Price target4.1
  • LLM news sentiment: +0.58 (n=3)

Insider

5.1/10data confidence 50%
ComponentSub-score
materiality5.0
holder change5.2
  • Negligible insider selling — $1,994,327 (0.001% of mkt cap)

Peer rank

2.9/10data confidence 80%
ComponentSub-score
value rank0.8
quality rank6.4
growth rank4.6

Technical

4.8/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
bollinger2.7
support resistance2.2
52w position9.2
gap5.0

Risk (lower is worse)

5.4/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
short interest8.3
days to cover8.2
volatility3.3
put call6.4
implied vol3.9
max pain risk3.0
beta5.7
debt equity4.0
news risk6.0
  • Above max pain $45

Catalyst

6.3/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
erm5.0
earnings history10.0
earnings timing5.0
surprise avg5.8
dividend safety5.2
news activity7.0
  • Strong earnings: 3B/0M
  • Dividend: 38.0%

How the verdict was assembled

Engine trigger

Multiple concerning factors. Consider reducing position.

Engine technical detail
verdict_path: L4:PATH_F_SELL
Passed (6)
  • MOMENTUM:5.0>=4.5
  • INSIDER:OK
  • 8K:CLEAN
  • EARNINGS_PROXIMITY:19d clear
  • SEMI_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
  • MATERIALS_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
Failed (1)
  • ASYMMETRY:-1.2=NEGATIVE
Warning (1)
  • MOMENTUM:5.0<5.5 (soft — BUY_NOW allowed but watch)
Reward-to-Risk
-1.21
Upside
-18.1%
Downside
15.0%
Sizing output
AVOID

SetupBREAKOUT Golden cross, above all MAs, RSI 64, MACD bullish

EdgeCATALYST Earnings in 19d with 3/4 beat streak

SuitabilityAGGRESSIVE Beta 1.33>1.3

Investment implication

The F-path SELL output reflects an overall score of 4.2 below the 5.6 soft trigger — multiple weakening dimensions accumulated rather than a single hard-floor breach. The strongest dimension ( Quality at 7.2) was not enough to lift the adjusted overall above the threshold. Co-occurring failed gates ( ASYMMETRY:-1.2=NEGATIVE) reinforce the read. Current asymmetry R:R is -1.21 — supplementary context, not the trigger for this path.

The strongest dimensions are Quality at 7.2, Growth at 6.7, and Catalyst at 6.3; the weakest are Value at 2.7, Peer rank at 2.9, and Technical at 4.8. The V9 engine flagged 1 failed gate with 1 warning, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of -1.21 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.

What would invalidate the thesis

Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.

  • P1The company demonstrates a wide economic moat, net margins near 16%, and a Piotroski F-Score of 7 out of 9, reflecting a durable competitive position and returns profile that has historically held through different market environments.

    Trip ifOperating margin falls below 13% for 2 consecutive quarters.

  • P2The company delivered an in-line result in the most recent quarter, preceded by three consecutive quarterly beats — with a new report approximately 28 days away that has historically served as a positive catalyst.

    Trip ifEPS surprise falls below 0% for 2 consecutive quarters following the current in-line result.

  • P3At a forward P/E of 32.2 times and a PEG ratio of 2.50, the shares screen expensive, limiting margin of safety if earnings growth decelerates even modestly.

    Trip ifForward P/E compresses below 22x, indicating the valuation headwind has resolved.

  • P4The stock has reached its technical resistance target, leaving only 0.1% headroom to the upside against approximately 7% potential downside — an asymmetry that has inverted and does not justify initiating or adding to a position at current levels.

    Trip ifUpside to the price target expands beyond 8% from current levels, indicating a sustained breakout above the $92.84 resistance ceiling.

Engine reasoning is mechanically derived from pipeline gate outputs. See decision view.

Home Stocks IBKR Why this verdict