Skip to main content
HLIHoulihan Lokey, Inc.Hold5.8·$137.88-0.09%
HLI · Why this verdict

Why Houlihan Lokey (HLI) is rated HOLD

Updated

Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Show full disclosure ▾

About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.

Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.

Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.

No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.

No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.

Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.

Methodology · Editorial policy & full disclaimer

VerdictHOLD
Overall score5.8/10
ConfidenceMEDIUM
MacroNEUTRAL
TrendMatrix Research · core thesis

Engine thesis — one sentence

Houlihan Lokey carries a high-quality franchise with strong operating margins and a favorable long-term earnings record, but a confirmed technical downtrend, a recent earnings miss, declining revenue, and a risk/reward just below the asymmetry threshold argue for holding existing positions and waiting for momentum to stabilize before committing new capital.

Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.

Thesis pillars

The business generates operating margins of 16% and holds a Piotroski F-Score of 7/9, while trading at a forward price-to-earnings of approximately 14.8x with a PEG of 0.29 — positioning that screens attractively valued relative to the quality of the earnings stream.

Stable
Quality
Expectation
Operating margins should sustain above 14% and earnings per share estimates should stabilize or rise over the next four quarters, confirming the quality profile is intact.

CounterCapital markets advisory businesses are highly sensitive to transaction volumes; if M&A and restructuring activity continues to slow, the 16% operating margin could compress materially, eroding the quality case and making the current valuation less attractive than it appears.

Revenue declined approximately 5% year-over-year, introducing a meaningful growth headwind that contrasts with the strong earnings per share growth profile and raises questions about whether earnings expansion is being driven by margin improvement and cost control rather than top-line momentum.

Stable
Growth
Expectation
Revenue should return to flat or positive year-over-year growth within two quarters, demonstrating that the decline was cyclical rather than structural.

CounterRevenue growth recovering above 5% year-over-year for 2 consecutive quarters would indicate the top-line headwind has fully reversed, falsifying the structural concern embedded in this pillar.

A death cross is in place, the stock trades below all major moving averages with the long-term trend slope declining approximately 3.9% over 30 days, and the RSI at 34 reflects near-oversold conditions — a combination that signals near-term price momentum is firmly negative, despite rising on-balance volume suggesting latent institutional demand.

Stable
Momentum
Expectation
For the technical picture to improve, the stock must reclaim the 200-day moving average and that average's slope must turn positive, events that would confirm the downtrend has exhausted rather than deepened.

CounterIf the stock reclaims the 200-day moving average and holds above it for 4 consecutive weeks, the downtrend thesis is invalidated and the technical picture shifts from a falling-knife setup to a genuine recovery.

With only 7.3% headroom to the analyst take-profit target and a risk/reward of approximately 1.1-to-1, the current setup offers insufficient compensation relative to the downside risk from the confirmed technical breakdown — this is a hold situation, not a new-entry opportunity.

Stable
Price targets
Expectation
For asymmetry to justify new capital, the stock must pull back sufficiently to create at least 20% upside to the target, or the analyst consensus target must be revised meaningfully higher.

CounterIf the stock pulls back more than 15% from current levels while fundamentals hold steady, the upside to the target would expand above 22% and the risk/reward would reset above 1.5-to-1, invalidating the thin-asymmetry concern.

Per-dimension breakdown

Value

7.5/10data confidence 83%
ComponentSub-score
P/E5.8
P/S7.8
Fwd P/E8.1
PEG10.0
Analyst target6.0
  • Forward P/E: 14.6x
  • PEG: 0.28
  • Attractively valued

Quality

7.5/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
ROE6.1
ROA7.0
Gross margin10.0
Op margin9.0
Net margin8.1
Current ratio5.1
Moat6.6
Piotroski F7.8
  • Strong margins: 16%
  • Strong Piotroski F-Score: 7/9

Growth

5.7/10data confidence 67%
ComponentSub-score
Rev growth1.4
EPS growth10.0
  • Declining revenue: -5%

Momentum

3.3/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
RSI4.5
MACD10.0
OBV1.0
MA position1.0
Volume0.0
  • Volume distribution (falling OBV)
  • Below 200-MA, MA slope -4.1%/30d — confirmed downtrend

Sentiment

6.0/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
Analyst rating5.0
Price target8.1
erm sentiment5.0
  • Analyst upside: 24%

Insider

5.0/10data confidence 50%

Peer rank

2.7/10data confidence 80%
ComponentSub-score
value rank4.2
quality rank5.3
growth rank1.4

Technical

5.3/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
bollinger6.3
support resistance6.4
52w position3.2

Risk (lower is worse)

7.7/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
short interest8.3
days to cover8.7
volatility5.1
put call10.0
implied vol6.2
max pain risk7.0
beta7.3
debt equity9.2

Catalyst

6.0/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
erm5.0
earnings history6.7
earnings timing5.0
surprise avg6.5
dividend safety7.0
  • Strong earnings: 3B/1M
  • Dividend: 203.0%

How the verdict was assembled

Engine trigger

Maintain position. Not compelling to add more.

Engine technical detail
verdict_path: L4:PATH_F_HOLD
Passed (6)
  • INSIDER:OK
  • 8K:CLEAN
  • NEWS_EVENTS:NONE_RECENT
  • EARNINGS_PROXIMITY:33d clear
  • SEMI_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
  • MATERIALS_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
Failed (3)
  • MOMENTUM:3.3<4.5
  • ASYMMETRY:1.4<1.5@spot
  • DEATH_CROSS:HARD_BLOCK
Warning (0)

none

Reward-to-Risk
1.40
Upside
+8.3%
Downside
5.9%
Sizing output
AVOID

SetupRECOVERY Death cross but MACD improving, RSI 45

EdgeNO_EDGE No clear edge identified

SuitabilityMODERATE Balanced profile

Investment implication

None of the engine's positive-conviction paths (C-quality, D-momentum) triggered — the F-path HOLD reflects balanced signals. Strongest-cleared gate: INSIDER:OK. Top dim: Risk (lower is worse) at 7.7; weakest: Peer rank at 2.7. No conviction either direction.

The strongest dimensions are Risk (lower is worse) at 7.7, Value at 7.5, and Quality at 7.5; the weakest are Peer rank at 2.7, Momentum at 3.3, and Insider at 5.0. The V9 engine flagged 3 failed gates, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of 1.40 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.

What would invalidate the thesis

Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.

  • P1The business generates operating margins of 16% and holds a Piotroski F-Score of 7/9, while trading at a forward price-to-earnings of approximately 14.8x with a PEG of 0.29 — positioning that screens attractively valued relative to the quality of the earnings stream.

    Trip ifOperating margin falls below 12% for 2 consecutive quarters.

  • P2Revenue declined approximately 5% year-over-year, introducing a meaningful growth headwind that contrasts with the strong earnings per share growth profile and raises questions about whether earnings expansion is being driven by margin improvement and cost control rather than top-line momentum.

    Trip ifRevenue growth turns positive above 5% year-over-year for 2 consecutive quarters, indicating the top-line decline has reversed.

  • P3A death cross is in place, the stock trades below all major moving averages with the long-term trend slope declining approximately 3.9% over 30 days, and the RSI at 34 reflects near-oversold conditions — a combination that signals near-term price momentum is firmly negative, despite rising on-balance volume suggesting latent institutional demand.

    Trip ifStock reclaims the 200-day moving average and holds above it for 4 consecutive weeks, signaling the confirmed downtrend has reversed.

  • P4With only 7.3% headroom to the analyst take-profit target and a risk/reward of approximately 1.1-to-1, the current setup offers insufficient compensation relative to the downside risk from the confirmed technical breakdown — this is a hold situation, not a new-entry opportunity.

    Trip ifStock pulls back more than 15% from current levels, expanding upside to the target above 22% and restoring an asymmetry ratio greater than 1.5-to-1.

Engine reasoning is mechanically derived from pipeline gate outputs. See decision view.

Home Stocks HLI Why this verdict