Should you buy The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Comp (GT)?
Updated
Goodyear Tire presents a combination of below-minimum business quality, declining revenue, two consecutive earnings misses in the most recent quarters, and confirmed technical weakness that makes it difficult to construct a credible investment case at current levels, with the stock offering essentially no upside to its near-term ceiling and an unfavorable risk/reward.
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Show full disclosure ▾Hide full disclosure ▴
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
Engine methodology range
Range computation requires sufficient peer-comparable data; available for tickers with peer_count ≥3.
What the engine is tracking
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
Business quality scores substantially below the threshold for a sound investment, with no discernible competitive moat, near-zero operating margins, and broad impairment across every key quality metric including return on assets, gross margin, and net margin. Quality breakdown | If this pillar proves wrong, the business establishes a positive operating margin for at least 2 consecutive quarters and the Piotroski financial health score rises above 6 out of 9. | →Stable |
| CounterCompanies in capital-intensive commodity industries often carry structurally thin margins that can improve sharply when raw material costs fall; if input cost deflation materializes, a near-zero-margin operation can see rapid earnings recovery without any structural competitive change. | ||
Revenue has declined approximately 9% year-over-year while operating margins are near zero, a combination that compresses the financial cushion and limits the company's ability to invest in its competitive position or service its debt load. Growth breakdown | If this pillar proves wrong, year-over-year revenue growth turns positive and operating margin expands above 5% for 2 consecutive quarters. | →Stable |
| CounterA forward price-to-earnings of 8.6 times already prices in a degree of cyclical weakness; if auto production volumes normalize and raw material costs ease, both revenue and margins can rebound meaningfully from a low base at a multiple that provides little premium. | ||
The two most recent quarterly results were both misses — with the latest quarter delivering a 56% negative surprise — after two strong beats in the prior year, suggesting the earnings trajectory has deteriorated rather than representing a one-quarter stumble. Earnings | If this pillar proves wrong, the company posts a positive earnings surprise in the next quarterly report and EPS turns positive on a trailing basis. | →Stable |
| CounterThe extreme magnitude of the prior beats — including a 443% positive surprise three quarters ago — shows the business can swing dramatically; conservatively set guidance could again produce outsized beats even from a weak baseline. | ||
Business quality scores substantially below the threshold for a sound investment, with no discernible competitive moat, near-zero operating margins, and broad impairment across every key quality metric including return on assets, gross margin, and net margin.
→Stable- Expectation
- If this pillar proves wrong, the business establishes a positive operating margin for at least 2 consecutive quarters and the Piotroski financial health score rises above 6 out of 9.
CounterCompanies in capital-intensive commodity industries often carry structurally thin margins that can improve sharply when raw material costs fall; if input cost deflation materializes, a near-zero-margin operation can see rapid earnings recovery without any structural competitive change.
Revenue has declined approximately 9% year-over-year while operating margins are near zero, a combination that compresses the financial cushion and limits the company's ability to invest in its competitive position or service its debt load.
→Stable- Expectation
- If this pillar proves wrong, year-over-year revenue growth turns positive and operating margin expands above 5% for 2 consecutive quarters.
CounterA forward price-to-earnings of 8.6 times already prices in a degree of cyclical weakness; if auto production volumes normalize and raw material costs ease, both revenue and margins can rebound meaningfully from a low base at a multiple that provides little premium.
The two most recent quarterly results were both misses — with the latest quarter delivering a 56% negative surprise — after two strong beats in the prior year, suggesting the earnings trajectory has deteriorated rather than representing a one-quarter stumble.
→Stable- Expectation
- If this pillar proves wrong, the company posts a positive earnings surprise in the next quarterly report and EPS turns positive on a trailing basis.
CounterThe extreme magnitude of the prior beats — including a 443% positive surprise three quarters ago — shows the business can swing dramatically; conservatively set guidance could again produce outsized beats even from a weak baseline.
▸ Show 1 more pillar▾ Show fewer
The stock trades below its 200-day moving average with a confirmed declining slope of negative 6.4% over 30 days, while a put/call ratio of 1.40 and short interest of 15% of float reflect significant institutional skepticism about the near-term outlook.
→Stable- Expectation
- If this pillar proves wrong, the stock reclaims and holds above the 200-day moving average for at least 30 consecutive days and short interest declines below 10%.
CounterA rising MACD alongside an RSI near 66 suggests short-term buying momentum is building even within the downtrend; elevated short positioning creates fuel for a mechanical squeeze if any positive catalyst emerges.
→ Full pillar scorecard with all 4 pillars + per-dimension breakdown
When this thesis breaks
Falsifiable conditions per pillar — any one trip warrants review independent of price action. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
- P1Business quality scores substantially below the threshold for a sound investment, with no discernible competitive moat, near-zero operating margins, and broad impairment across every key quality metric including return on assets, gross margin, and net margin.
Trip ifOperating margin turns positive and exceeds 2% for 2 consecutive quarters.
- P2Revenue has declined approximately 9% year-over-year while operating margins are near zero, a combination that compresses the financial cushion and limits the company's ability to invest in its competitive position or service its debt load.
Trip ifRevenue growth turns positive above 0% year-over-year for 2 consecutive quarters.
- P3The two most recent quarterly results were both misses — with the latest quarter delivering a 56% negative surprise — after two strong beats in the prior year, suggesting the earnings trajectory has deteriorated rather than representing a one-quarter stumble.
Trip ifEPS surprise exceeds 5% for 2 consecutive quarters.
- P4The stock trades below its 200-day moving average with a confirmed declining slope of negative 6.4% over 30 days, while a put/call ratio of 1.40 and short interest of 15% of float reflect significant institutional skepticism about the near-term outlook.
Trip ifPrice rises above the 200-day moving average and holds there for 30 consecutive days.
How the engine reached this verdict
TrendMatrix's engine output for The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Comp (GT) is SELL_IF_HOLDING with medium conviction, score 4.4/10 at $6.38. An L1 hard-floor gate blocked the positive-verdict path — Quality below minimum threshold. Co-failing gates ( MOMENTUM:3.6<4.5, ASYMMETRY:0.1<1.5@spot, DEATH_CROSS:HARD_BLOCK, 8K_SERIOUS:2.05) reinforce the read; dimensional pillars cannot lift the engine output above the verdict floor while the L1 gate is active.
The dominant failed gate is momentum at 3.6 vs threshold 4.5 (with co-failures: reward-to-risk, death cross, 8k serious). SELL flips back toward HOLD if momentum recovers above its threshold AND a co-failing gate also clears. The strongest-cleared gate today is INSIDER:OK.
On the bear side: V8: Target reached (1.8% upside); Quality below floor (1.5 < 4.0). Active engine warnings: V8: Target reached (1.8% upside), Quality below floor (1.5 < 4.0), V9 Gate Failed: MOMENTUM:3.6<4.5.
The engine's exit framework anchors to a tactical sell band near $6.38, with structural invalidation at $5.93. The asymmetric R:R against a reversal hypothesis is 0.26 — the upside scenario exists, but it requires multiple structural gates to flip; the downside scenario requires only one more disappointment. The engine's sizing output: 0.5% of portfolio at this asymmetry level (none-conviction tier).
For the full 10-dimension breakdown + V9 gate detail: Why TrendMatrix rates GT — 10-dimension breakdown →
Bear case
- ▸V8: Target reached (1.8% upside)
- ▸Quality below floor (1.5 < 4.0)