Value
8.4/10data confidence 67%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 8.6 |
| P/S | 9.2 |
| EV/EBITDA | 6.2 |
| Fwd P/E | 8.7 |
- ▸Forward P/E: 12.9x
- ▸Attractively valued
GRBK · Why this verdict
Why Green Brick Partners (GRBK) is rated SELL
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Show full disclosure ▾Hide full disclosure ▴
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
VerdictSELL
Overall score5.0/10
ConfidenceMEDIUM
MacroNEUTRAL
TrendMatrix Research · core thesis
Engine thesis — one sentence
An attractively valued residential homebuilder with three recent quarterly earnings beats trades just below its near-term technical ceiling with only 0.8% headroom remaining—and a risk/reward ratio of roughly 0.15-to-1 in an unfavorable direction—while revenues are declining 5% year-over-year and free cash flow is converting at only 27% of net income, making the current price a poor entry point despite the sound fundamental valuation.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
Thesis pillars
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
At a forward price-to-earnings multiple of 11.6x the company screens as attractively valued, with earnings and sales multiples among the most favorable in its peer group and an overall value score of 8.8 out of 10—providing a meaningful cushion against multiple compression if business conditions deteriorate. Value | Forward earnings multiple expands above 14x over 12 months as revenue stabilizes and the earnings beat streak continues, rewarding entry at current valuations. | →Stable |
| CounterAttractive valuation in cyclical construction names often reflects the market discounting a deteriorating earnings cycle; at a 11.6x forward multiple with revenues declining 5% year-over-year, cheap-on-current-earnings can quickly become expensive on through-cycle normalized earnings. | ||
Revenue is declining at approximately 5% year-over-year, placing growth at the low end of the sector spectrum and making earnings improvement dependent entirely on margin expansion or volume-per-unit pricing rather than top-line expansion. Growth breakdown | Revenue growth turns positive above 0% year-over-year for 2 consecutive reported quarters, removing the primary growth headwind. | →Stable |
| CounterThe three consecutive earnings beats alongside the revenue decline suggest disciplined cost and pricing management; if margins hold during a soft volume period, the business may be building operating leverage that could produce a sharp earnings recovery when volumes normalize. | ||
With current price at $72.06 and the take-profit level at $72.62, just $0.56 (0.8%) of headroom remains to the near-term technical target—a risk/reward ratio of roughly 0.15-to-1—leaving almost no margin for new buyers and making the setup unfavorable at current prices. Price targets | Price pulls back below $65 and resets the reward/risk geometry to a more favorable entry level before the next earnings print. | →Stable |
| CounterA stock grinding through and holding near a key resistance level can break out cleanly on a catalyst; the unfavorable asymmetry reverts immediately on any upward revision to the price target, and the earnings beat streak may provide that revision. | ||
Free cash flow represents only 27% of reported net income—flagged as an earnings quality concern—suggesting that a significant portion of stated earnings is not converting into actual cash, which may overstate the underlying earnings power supporting the current valuation. Quality | Free cash flow as a percentage of net income rises above 60% for 2 consecutive reported quarters, closing the gap between reported earnings and cash generation. | →Stable |
| CounterHomebuilders naturally consume cash for land inventory and lot acquisition during periods of anticipated volume recovery; a low free cash flow conversion ratio may reflect deliberate capital deployment into future revenue, and the ratio can recover sharply once lot purchases normalize. | ||
Although price is trading above the 200-day moving average, on-balance volume is declining—a distribution pattern suggesting that participants are quietly reducing positions into price strength rather than accumulating. Momentum breakdown | On-balance volume turns positive and rises for 4 consecutive weeks, invalidating the distribution signal and indicating renewed buying conviction. | →Stable |
| CounterPrice holding above the 200-day average is a genuine positive technical signal; falling on-balance volume in a small-cap name may partly reflect declining overall share volume rather than active institutional selling, and the moving average position has a stronger track record as a trend indicator. | ||
At a forward price-to-earnings multiple of 11.6x the company screens as attractively valued, with earnings and sales multiples among the most favorable in its peer group and an overall value score of 8.8 out of 10—providing a meaningful cushion against multiple compression if business conditions deteriorate.
→StableValue
- Expectation
- Forward earnings multiple expands above 14x over 12 months as revenue stabilizes and the earnings beat streak continues, rewarding entry at current valuations.
CounterAttractive valuation in cyclical construction names often reflects the market discounting a deteriorating earnings cycle; at a 11.6x forward multiple with revenues declining 5% year-over-year, cheap-on-current-earnings can quickly become expensive on through-cycle normalized earnings.
Revenue is declining at approximately 5% year-over-year, placing growth at the low end of the sector spectrum and making earnings improvement dependent entirely on margin expansion or volume-per-unit pricing rather than top-line expansion.
→StableGrowth breakdown
- Expectation
- Revenue growth turns positive above 0% year-over-year for 2 consecutive reported quarters, removing the primary growth headwind.
CounterThe three consecutive earnings beats alongside the revenue decline suggest disciplined cost and pricing management; if margins hold during a soft volume period, the business may be building operating leverage that could produce a sharp earnings recovery when volumes normalize.
With current price at $72.06 and the take-profit level at $72.62, just $0.56 (0.8%) of headroom remains to the near-term technical target—a risk/reward ratio of roughly 0.15-to-1—leaving almost no margin for new buyers and making the setup unfavorable at current prices.
→StablePrice targets
- Expectation
- Price pulls back below $65 and resets the reward/risk geometry to a more favorable entry level before the next earnings print.
CounterA stock grinding through and holding near a key resistance level can break out cleanly on a catalyst; the unfavorable asymmetry reverts immediately on any upward revision to the price target, and the earnings beat streak may provide that revision.
Free cash flow represents only 27% of reported net income—flagged as an earnings quality concern—suggesting that a significant portion of stated earnings is not converting into actual cash, which may overstate the underlying earnings power supporting the current valuation.
→StableQuality
- Expectation
- Free cash flow as a percentage of net income rises above 60% for 2 consecutive reported quarters, closing the gap between reported earnings and cash generation.
CounterHomebuilders naturally consume cash for land inventory and lot acquisition during periods of anticipated volume recovery; a low free cash flow conversion ratio may reflect deliberate capital deployment into future revenue, and the ratio can recover sharply once lot purchases normalize.
Although price is trading above the 200-day moving average, on-balance volume is declining—a distribution pattern suggesting that participants are quietly reducing positions into price strength rather than accumulating.
→StableMomentum breakdown
- Expectation
- On-balance volume turns positive and rises for 4 consecutive weeks, invalidating the distribution signal and indicating renewed buying conviction.
CounterPrice holding above the 200-day average is a genuine positive technical signal; falling on-balance volume in a small-cap name may partly reflect declining overall share volume rather than active institutional selling, and the moving average position has a stronger track record as a trend indicator.
Per-dimension breakdown
Quality
5.2/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 5.8 |
| ROA | 6.8 |
| Gross margin | 2.0 |
| Op margin | 7.2 |
| Net margin | 7.2 |
| Current ratio | 5.7 |
| FCF quality | 2.2 |
| Moat | 5.1 |
| Piotroski F | 4.4 |
- ▸Earnings quality RED FLAG: 27% FCF/NI
- ▸No competitive moat
Growth
0.7/10data confidence 67%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 1.3 |
| EPS growth | 0.0 |
- ▸Declining revenue: -5%
Momentum
6.6/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 4.2 |
| MACD | 10.0 |
| OBV | 10.0 |
| MA position | 9.0 |
| Volume | 0.0 |
- ▸Overbought (RSI 75)
- ▸Volume accumulation (rising OBV)
- ▸Above 200-day MA
Sentiment
4.0/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Analyst rating | 5.0 |
| Price target | 1.8 |
| erm sentiment | 5.0 |
- ▸Below analyst target
Insider
5.0/10data confidence 50%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| materiality | 5.0 |
| holder change | 5.0 |
- ▸Insider selling (low materiality) — $352,930 (0.010% of mkt cap)
Peer rank
5.2/10data confidence 80%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 5.3 |
| quality rank | 8.4 |
| growth rank | 6.9 |
- ▸Attractive P/E vs peers
- ▸Best-in-class margins
Technical
3.4/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 0.0 |
| support resistance | 0.3 |
| 52w position | 9.9 |
Risk (lower is worse)
6.0/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 10.0 |
| volatility | 4.2 |
| put call | 5.0 |
| implied vol | 6.7 |
| max pain risk | 3.0 |
| beta | 3.9 |
| debt equity | 9.4 |
- ▸Above max pain $50
Catalyst
6.0/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 5.0 |
| earnings history | 6.7 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 7.4 |
- ▸Strong earnings: 3B/1M
How the verdict was assembled
Engine trigger
Multiple concerning factors. Consider reducing position.
Engine technical detail
verdict_path:
L4:PATH_F_SELLPassed (6)
- MOMENTUM:6.6>=5.5
- INSIDER:OK
- NEWS_EVENTS:NONE_RECENT
- EARNINGS_PROXIMITY:34d clear
- SEMI_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
- MATERIALS_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
Failed (2)
- ASYMMETRY:-2.4=NEGATIVE
- 8K_CRITICAL:4.02
Warning (0)
none
Reward-to-Risk
-2.42
Upside
-36.2%
Downside
15.0%
Sizing output
AVOID
SetupUNKNOWN — No clear chart pattern; technical signals are mixed
EdgeNO_EDGE — No clear edge identified
SuitabilityAGGRESSIVE — Beta 1.82>1.3, MCap $3.5B<$5B
Investment implication
The F-path SELL output reflects an overall score of 5.0 below the 5.6 soft trigger — multiple weakening dimensions accumulated rather than a single hard-floor breach. The strongest dimension ( Value at 8.4) was not enough to lift the adjusted overall above the threshold. Co-occurring failed gates ( ASYMMETRY:-2.4=NEGATIVE, 8K_CRITICAL:4.02) reinforce the read. Current asymmetry R:R is -2.42 — supplementary context, not the trigger for this path.
The strongest dimensions are Value at 8.4, Momentum at 6.6, and Risk (lower is worse) at 6.0; the weakest are Growth at 0.7, Technical at 3.4, and Sentiment at 4.0. The V9 engine flagged 2 failed gates, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of -2.42 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
What would invalidate the thesis
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
- P1At a forward price-to-earnings multiple of 11.6x the company screens as attractively valued, with earnings and sales multiples among the most favorable in its peer group and an overall value score of 8.8 out of 10—providing a meaningful cushion against multiple compression if business conditions deteriorate.
Trip ifForward P/E multiple expands above 18x, removing the valuation cushion that anchors the investment thesis.
- P2Revenue is declining at approximately 5% year-over-year, placing growth at the low end of the sector spectrum and making earnings improvement dependent entirely on margin expansion or volume-per-unit pricing rather than top-line expansion.
Trip ifRevenue growth exceeds 0% year-over-year for 2 consecutive reported quarters, turning positive and removing the growth headwind.
- P3Free cash flow represents only 27% of reported net income—flagged as an earnings quality concern—suggesting that a significant portion of stated earnings is not converting into actual cash, which may overstate the underlying earnings power supporting the current valuation.
Trip ifFree cash flow as a percentage of net income rises above 60% for 2 consecutive reported quarters, closing the earnings-quality gap.
- P4With current price at $72.06 and the take-profit level at $72.62, just $0.56 (0.8%) of headroom remains to the near-term technical target—a risk/reward ratio of roughly 0.15-to-1—leaving almost no margin for new buyers and making the setup unfavorable at current prices.
Trip ifPrice breaks above $80 and sustains for 2 consecutive weeks, establishing a new take-profit level and resetting the reward/risk geometry to favorable.
- P5Although price is trading above the 200-day moving average, on-balance volume is declining—a distribution pattern suggesting that participants are quietly reducing positions into price strength rather than accumulating.
Trip ifOn-balance volume rises for 4 consecutive weeks while price remains above $70, invalidating the distribution pattern.