Value
6.1/10data confidence 67%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 7.1 |
| P/S | 10.0 |
| EV/EBITDA | 6.7 |
| Fwd P/E | 4.8 |
- ▸Forward P/E: 25.8x
GNW · Why this verdict
Why Genworth Financial (GNW) is rated SELL
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Show full disclosure ▾Hide full disclosure ▴
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
VerdictSELL
Overall score4.3/10
ConfidenceMEDIUM
MacroNEUTRAL
TrendMatrix Research · core thesis
Engine thesis — one sentence
Genworth Financial is a below-floor-quality insurance franchise with a mixed earnings record, no identifiable competitive moat, and a risk/reward ratio of 1.34-to-1 that falls short of the minimum threshold—a combination that argues for exiting rather than holding the position.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
Thesis pillars
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
The company's overall quality assessment falls short of the minimum threshold required for a holding-grade position, with weak return on assets, thin operating margins, and no identifiable competitive moat—a profile that leaves the franchise exposed to any adverse shift in the insurance or financial-services environment. Warnings | Quality metrics improve above the minimum floor within four quarters as operating margins stabilize and return on assets recovers from current depressed levels. | →Stable |
| CounterFree cash flow is running at 465% of net income, indicating cash generation is meaningfully stronger than the accounting earnings alone imply—a buffer that could over time support a quality re-rating. | ||
Free cash flow is converting at 465% of net income, indicating the company is generating substantially more cash than its accounting profit figure suggests—a potentially supportive factor for capital allocation and debt service even when reported earnings are thin. Quality | Cash conversion ratio stays above 200% of net income over the next 12 months, confirming cash generation as a structural positive rather than a one-quarter event. | →Stable |
| CounterA conversion ratio this far above net income often reflects non-recurring timing items or reserve-related accounting differences in insurance businesses; without an explicit explanation in the data, the sustainability of this conversion rate is uncertain. | ||
The earnings record over the past four quarters is split evenly between beats and misses, with swings ranging from a 700% positive surprise to a 43% negative surprise—a pattern that reflects high earnings volatility rather than a reliable delivery track record. Earnings | Three beats in the next four quarters would confirm that earnings predictability is improving and reduce the uncertainty discount embedded in the stock. | →Stable |
| CounterThe average headline surprise figure is heavily inflated by a single outlier quarter; if the underlying delivery cadence ex-outlier is considered, the two misses carry more weight than the headline average suggests. | ||
With roughly 5.5% of headroom to the analyst-based price target and a risk/reward ratio of 1.34-to-1—below the minimum asymmetry bar—the current setup offers insufficient compensation for the downside risk embedded in a below-floor-quality franchise. Price targets | If wrong, the stock pulls back below $8.00, providing more than 16% upside to the $9.35 take-profit level and restoring an adequate risk/reward ratio. | →Stable |
| CounterAnalyst consensus implies a 24% upside to the longer-run price target, suggesting the market may be pricing in a quality recovery that the near-term setup geometry does not yet reflect. | ||
The company's overall quality assessment falls short of the minimum threshold required for a holding-grade position, with weak return on assets, thin operating margins, and no identifiable competitive moat—a profile that leaves the franchise exposed to any adverse shift in the insurance or financial-services environment.
→StableWarnings
- Expectation
- Quality metrics improve above the minimum floor within four quarters as operating margins stabilize and return on assets recovers from current depressed levels.
CounterFree cash flow is running at 465% of net income, indicating cash generation is meaningfully stronger than the accounting earnings alone imply—a buffer that could over time support a quality re-rating.
Free cash flow is converting at 465% of net income, indicating the company is generating substantially more cash than its accounting profit figure suggests—a potentially supportive factor for capital allocation and debt service even when reported earnings are thin.
→StableQuality
- Expectation
- Cash conversion ratio stays above 200% of net income over the next 12 months, confirming cash generation as a structural positive rather than a one-quarter event.
CounterA conversion ratio this far above net income often reflects non-recurring timing items or reserve-related accounting differences in insurance businesses; without an explicit explanation in the data, the sustainability of this conversion rate is uncertain.
The earnings record over the past four quarters is split evenly between beats and misses, with swings ranging from a 700% positive surprise to a 43% negative surprise—a pattern that reflects high earnings volatility rather than a reliable delivery track record.
→StableEarnings
- Expectation
- Three beats in the next four quarters would confirm that earnings predictability is improving and reduce the uncertainty discount embedded in the stock.
CounterThe average headline surprise figure is heavily inflated by a single outlier quarter; if the underlying delivery cadence ex-outlier is considered, the two misses carry more weight than the headline average suggests.
With roughly 5.5% of headroom to the analyst-based price target and a risk/reward ratio of 1.34-to-1—below the minimum asymmetry bar—the current setup offers insufficient compensation for the downside risk embedded in a below-floor-quality franchise.
→StablePrice targets
- Expectation
- If wrong, the stock pulls back below $8.00, providing more than 16% upside to the $9.35 take-profit level and restoring an adequate risk/reward ratio.
CounterAnalyst consensus implies a 24% upside to the longer-run price target, suggesting the market may be pricing in a quality recovery that the near-term setup geometry does not yet reflect.
Per-dimension breakdown
Quality
3.6/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 1.2 |
| ROA | 0.3 |
| Gross margin | 0.0 |
| Op margin | 3.1 |
| Net margin | 1.5 |
| Current ratio | 5.0 |
| FCF quality | 10.0 |
| Moat | 4.6 |
| Piotroski F | 6.7 |
- ▸Excellent cash conversion: 465% FCF/NI
- ▸No competitive moat
Growth
1.3/10data confidence 67%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 2.4 |
| EPS growth | 0.3 |
- ▸Declining revenue: -0%
Momentum
6.1/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 3.9 |
| MACD | 7.8 |
| OBV | 10.0 |
| MA position | 9.0 |
| Volume | 0.0 |
- ▸Overbought (RSI 82)
- ▸Volume accumulation (rising OBV)
- ▸Above 200-day MA
Sentiment
5.3/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Analyst rating | 5.0 |
| Price target | 7.4 |
| erm sentiment | 3.3 |
Insider
3.9/10data confidence 75%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| materiality | 4.5 |
| insider conviction | 2.0 |
| holder change | 5.1 |
- ▸Modest insider selling — $1,383,055 (0.039% of mkt cap)
Peer rank
3.5/10data confidence 80%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 5.1 |
| quality rank | 2.0 |
| growth rank | 2.0 |
Technical
3.3/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 0.1 |
| support resistance | 0.1 |
| 52w position | 9.8 |
Risk (lower is worse)
7.2/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 8.7 |
| days to cover | 8.2 |
| volatility | 8.1 |
| put call | 7.0 |
| implied vol | 5.6 |
| max pain risk | 3.0 |
| beta | 7.8 |
| debt equity | 9.1 |
- ▸Above max pain $1
Catalyst
5.5/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 3.5 |
| earnings history | 3.3 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 10.0 |
- ▸Earnings concerns: 2B/2M
How the verdict was assembled
Engine trigger
Quality below minimum threshold.
Engine technical detail
verdict_path:
L1:HARD_BLOCKPassed (7)
- MOMENTUM:6.1>=5.5
- INSIDER:OK
- 8K:CLEAN
- NEWS_EVENTS:NONE_RECENT
- EARNINGS_PROXIMITY:34d clear
- SEMI_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
- MATERIALS_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
Failed (0)
none
Warning (1)
- ASYMMETRY:UPSIDE_EXHAUSTED (upside=-0.1%)
Reward-to-Risk
0.00
Upside
-0.1%
Downside
11.6%
Sizing output
AVOID
SetupUNKNOWN — No clear chart pattern; technical signals are mixed
EdgeNO_EDGE — No clear edge identified
SuitabilityAGGRESSIVE — MCap $3.6B<$5B
Investment implication
The L1 gate blocked the positive-verdict path: a hard-floor threshold was breached, so dimensional pillars — including Risk (lower is worse) at 7.2 could not lift the engine output above the verdict floor.
The strongest dimensions are Risk (lower is worse) at 7.2, Value at 6.1, and Momentum at 6.1; the weakest are Growth at 1.3, Technical at 3.3, and Peer rank at 3.5. The V9 engine cleared all gates with 1 warning, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of 0.00 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
What would invalidate the thesis
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
- P1The company's overall quality assessment falls short of the minimum threshold required for a holding-grade position, with weak return on assets, thin operating margins, and no identifiable competitive moat—a profile that leaves the franchise exposed to any adverse shift in the insurance or financial-services environment.
Trip ifQuality score rises above the 4.0 minimum floor for 2 consecutive quarters.
- P2Free cash flow is converting at 465% of net income, indicating the company is generating substantially more cash than its accounting profit figure suggests—a potentially supportive factor for capital allocation and debt service even when reported earnings are thin.
Trip ifFree cash flow conversion falls below 100% of net income for 2 consecutive quarters.
- P3The earnings record over the past four quarters is split evenly between beats and misses, with swings ranging from a 700% positive surprise to a 43% negative surprise—a pattern that reflects high earnings volatility rather than a reliable delivery track record.
Trip ifEPS exceeds analyst consensus in 3 of the next 4 reported quarters.
- P4With roughly 5.5% of headroom to the analyst-based price target and a risk/reward ratio of 1.34-to-1—below the minimum asymmetry bar—the current setup offers insufficient compensation for the downside risk embedded in a below-floor-quality franchise.
Trip ifStock price falls below $8.00, providing more than 16% upside to the $9.35 take-profit level.