Skip to main content
GENIGenius Sports LimitedSell5.8·$5.54-2.03%
GENI · Why this verdict

Why Genius Sports (GENI) is rated SELL

Updated

Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Show full disclosure ▾

About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.

Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.

Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.

No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.

No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.

Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.

Methodology · Editorial policy & full disclaimer

VerdictSELL
Overall score5.8/10
ConfidenceMEDIUM
MacroNEUTRAL
TrendMatrix Research · core thesis

Engine thesis — one sentence

Genius Sports is the industry's top revenue grower at 30% year over year with a forward earnings multiple of 7.1x and 33% upside to the analyst price target, but business quality at 2.0 out of 10 sits well below any credible investment floor and three of four recent quarters ended in deep earnings misses — the growth is real, the business durability is not yet established.

Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.

Thesis pillars

Business quality sits at 2.0 out of 10 — the lowest possible rating — with gross margins near zero, negative operating and net margins, and no competitive moat identified, meaning the company is growing revenue while generating near-zero returns on that growth.

Stable
Warnings
Expectation
Quality recovers above 4.0 as gross and operating margins improve materially over at least two consecutive quarters.

CounterFor an early-stage platform business investing heavily in customer acquisition and data infrastructure, weak near-term margins may be the expected cost of building scale; if the platform economics improve with scale, the quality rating could inflect from this low base.

Revenue is growing at 30% year over year with strong earnings growth, and the company ranks as the industry growth leader among its peer group — a rate of expansion that trades at a forward earnings multiple of 7.1x and a price-to-growth ratio of 0.03.

Stable
Growth breakdown
Expectation
Revenue growth stays at or above 20% year over year for the next two reported quarters, confirming that the top-line expansion is durable rather than a one-period spike.

CounterThree of four recent quarters ended in earnings misses averaging roughly 255% below estimates, suggesting the company is growing revenue while burning through far more than expected at the bottom line; growth without earnings conversion may not re-rate the multiple.

The company has missed earnings estimates in three of the four most recent quarters, with an average shortfall of roughly 255% below consensus, indicating a wide and persistent gap between management guidance and actual results.

Stable
Earnings
Expectation
The miss pattern reverses — EPS surprise turns positive for at least 2 consecutive quarters — demonstrating that the gap between guidance and delivery has closed.

CounterThe most recent quarter produced a beat of roughly 65%, suggesting the trajectory may be improving; a single beat after a string of misses could mark the beginning of a guidance recalibration rather than a continuation of chronic underdelivery.

An elevated put-to-call ratio of 3.00 alongside implied volatility of 127% and an RSI of 75 — a technically overbought reading — suggests the recent price recovery may be outpacing the fundamental progress, creating a risk of a sharp pullback.

Stable
Risk breakdown
Expectation
The put-to-call ratio compresses below 1.5 and the RSI normalizes below 65, indicating the options-market risk premium has unwound and the overbought condition has resolved.

CounterElevated put activity in a recovering small-capitalization name can reflect protective hedges placed by early investors rather than new directional bets; the rising on-balance volume and improving MACD suggest accumulation is underway alongside the hedging activity.

Per-dimension breakdown

Value

9.3/10data confidence 67%
ComponentSub-score
P/S8.9
Fwd P/E9.9
PEG10.0
Analyst target9.0
  • Forward P/E: 5.8x
  • PEG: 0.02
  • Attractively valued

Quality

2.0/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
ROE0.0
ROA0.0
Gross margin0.5
Op margin0.0
Net margin0.0
Current ratio5.8
Moat4.2
Piotroski F5.6
  • No competitive moat
  • Quality concerns

Growth

10.0/10data confidence 67%
ComponentSub-score
Rev growth10.0
EPS growth10.0
  • Strong growth: 30% YoY

Momentum

1.6/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
RSI3.5
MACD0.5
OBV1.0
MA position3.0
Volume0.0
  • Volume distribution (falling OBV)
  • Below 200-MA, MA slope -10.8%/30d — confirmed downtrend

Sentiment

8.2/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
Analyst rating8.9
Price target9.9
erm sentiment5.0
  • Analyst upside: 83%

Insider

5.2/10data confidence 50%
ComponentSub-score
materiality5.0
holder change5.4
  • No net insider activity — $0 (0.000% of mkt cap)

Peer rank

4.5/10data confidence 80%
ComponentSub-score
value rank5.0
quality rank0.6
growth rank8.8
  • Industry growth leader

Technical

6.0/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
bollinger8.5
support resistance9.3
52w position0.0
gap6.0

Risk (lower is worse)

4.2/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
short interest6.0
days to cover7.9
volatility0.0
put call6.7
implied vol1.6
max pain risk7.0
beta3.6
debt equity0.6
  • High IV: 70%

Catalyst

2.5/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
erm5.0
earnings history0.0
earnings timing5.0
surprise avg0.0
  • Earnings concerns: 1B/3M

How the verdict was assembled

Engine trigger

Quality below minimum threshold.

Engine technical detail
verdict_path: L1:HARD_BLOCK
Passed (7)
  • ASYMMETRY:4.3>=1.5
  • INSIDER:OK
  • 8K:CLEAN
  • NEWS_EVENTS:NONE_RECENT
  • EARNINGS_PROXIMITY:41d clear
  • SEMI_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
  • MATERIALS_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
Failed (2)
  • MOMENTUM:1.6<4.5
  • DEATH_CROSS:HARD_BLOCK
Warning (0)

none

Reward-to-Risk
4.30
Upside
+64.4%
Downside
15.0%
Sizing output
AVOID

SetupUNKNOWN No clear chart pattern; technical signals are mixed

EdgeNO_EDGE No clear edge identified

SuitabilityAGGRESSIVE Beta 1.92>1.3, MCap $1.5B<$5B

Investment implication

The L1 gate blocked the positive-verdict path: a hard-floor threshold was breached, so dimensional pillars — including Growth at 10.0 could not lift the engine output above the verdict floor. Failed gate signal: MOMENTUM:1.6<4.5.

The strongest dimensions are Growth at 10.0, Value at 9.3, and Sentiment at 8.2; the weakest are Momentum at 1.6, Quality at 2.0, and Catalyst at 2.5. The V9 engine flagged 2 failed gates, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of 4.30 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.

What would invalidate the thesis

Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.

  • P1Revenue is growing at 30% year over year with strong earnings growth, and the company ranks as the industry growth leader among its peer group — a rate of expansion that trades at a forward earnings multiple of 7.1x and a price-to-growth ratio of 0.03.

    Trip ifRevenue growth falls below 15% year over year for 2 consecutive quarters, indicating the top-line expansion has decelerated materially.

  • P2Business quality sits at 2.0 out of 10 — the lowest possible rating — with gross margins near zero, negative operating and net margins, and no competitive moat identified, meaning the company is growing revenue while generating near-zero returns on that growth.

    Trip ifQuality score rises above 4.0 for 2 consecutive quarters, indicating the business has crossed the minimum investment floor.

  • P3The company has missed earnings estimates in three of the four most recent quarters, with an average shortfall of roughly 255% below consensus, indicating a wide and persistent gap between management guidance and actual results.

    Trip ifEPS surprise exceeds 0% for 2 consecutive quarters, reversing the chronic miss pattern.

  • P4An elevated put-to-call ratio of 3.00 alongside implied volatility of 127% and an RSI of 75 — a technically overbought reading — suggests the recent price recovery may be outpacing the fundamental progress, creating a risk of a sharp pullback.

    Trip ifPut-to-call ratio falls below 1.5 and RSI normalizes below 65, indicating the overbought and hedged positioning has unwound.

Engine reasoning is mechanically derived from pipeline gate outputs. See decision view.

Home Stocks GENI Why this verdict