Value
8.1/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 5.9 |
| P/S | 10.0 |
| EV/EBITDA | 8.5 |
| Fwd P/E | 9.4 |
| PEG | 10.0 |
| Analyst target | 5.0 |
- ▸Forward P/E: 9.2x
- ▸PEG: 0.07
- ▸Attractively valued
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
Flowers Foods offers attractive valuation with a forward earnings multiple of 9.3x and a near-perfect earnings beat record, but the stock has essentially reached its analyst price target, leaving only 1.7% of headroom, while high short interest, an elevated put/call ratio, and customer concentration risk cap near-term upside.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
Free cash flow conversion stands at 329% of net income, meaning the business generates far more cash than its reported earnings suggest — a signal of high working capital efficiency and earnings quality. Quality | Free cash flow conversion remains above 200% of net income for the next 4 quarters, confirming the structural nature of this cash generation advantage. | →Stable |
| CounterA free-cash-flow-to-net-income ratio above 100% can reflect timing differences in working capital or below-investment maintenance capex rather than sustainable outperformance; if reinvestment requirements normalize, conversion could compress meaningfully. | ||
The company has beaten consensus earnings estimates in 3 of the past 4 quarters, with beats of 8%, 46%, and 2% respectively, and the average positive surprise across all four quarters is 14%, demonstrating a pattern of consistently delivering above expectations. Earnings | The company continues to beat consensus estimates in at least 3 of the next 4 quarters, sustaining the recent track record. | →Stable |
| CounterOne of the four quarters was only an in-line result, and the distribution of beats is uneven — the 46% beat in the most recent February quarter may reflect a particularly low consensus bar that normalizes going forward rather than repeatable operational outperformance. | ||
At a forward earnings multiple of 9.3x with a price-to-earnings-growth ratio of 0.07, the stock screens as attractively valued relative to its earnings growth profile within the packaged foods sector. Value | The forward multiple re-rates toward 12x or higher as the market recognizes the earnings growth trajectory over the next 12 months. | →Stable |
| CounterThe low valuation may be justified by below-average business quality scores, a confirmed downtrend in price below the 200-day moving average with a slope of -9.5% per 30 days, and high short interest of 19% — the market may be pricing in structural risk rather than offering a discount. | ||
The top 10 customers account for 57.7% of revenue, creating a meaningful concentration risk — losing or repricing any major relationship could produce a disproportionate revenue impact. Bear case | Customer concentration is falsified as a structural risk if revenue grows more than 5% year-over-year for 2 consecutive quarters without any disclosed customer loss. | →Stable |
| CounterHigh customer concentration in packaged foods typically reflects long-standing relationships with large retailers that provide revenue predictability rather than fragility; stable repeat purchasing may make these concentrated relationships durable rather than risky. | ||
CounterA free-cash-flow-to-net-income ratio above 100% can reflect timing differences in working capital or below-investment maintenance capex rather than sustainable outperformance; if reinvestment requirements normalize, conversion could compress meaningfully.
CounterOne of the four quarters was only an in-line result, and the distribution of beats is uneven — the 46% beat in the most recent February quarter may reflect a particularly low consensus bar that normalizes going forward rather than repeatable operational outperformance.
CounterThe low valuation may be justified by below-average business quality scores, a confirmed downtrend in price below the 200-day moving average with a slope of -9.5% per 30 days, and high short interest of 19% — the market may be pricing in structural risk rather than offering a discount.
CounterHigh customer concentration in packaged foods typically reflects long-standing relationships with large retailers that provide revenue predictability rather than fragility; stable repeat purchasing may make these concentrated relationships durable rather than risky.
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 5.9 |
| P/S | 10.0 |
| EV/EBITDA | 8.5 |
| Fwd P/E | 9.4 |
| PEG | 10.0 |
| Analyst target | 5.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 1.8 |
| ROA | 3.5 |
| Gross margin | 5.7 |
| Op margin | 3.3 |
| Net margin | 0.7 |
| Current ratio | 3.1 |
| FCF quality | 10.0 |
| Moat | 5.0 |
| Piotroski F | 7.8 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 4.2 |
| EPS growth | 10.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 3.9 |
| MACD | 6.8 |
| OBV | 10.0 |
| MA position | 4.0 |
| Volume | 3.9 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Analyst rating | 5.0 |
| Price target | 7.4 |
| erm sentiment | 5.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| materiality | 3.5 |
| holder change | 5.1 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 5.3 |
| quality rank | 2.0 |
| growth rank | 6.2 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 3.2 |
| support resistance | 4.2 |
| 52w position | 0.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 0.6 |
| days to cover | 7.1 |
| volatility | 1.2 |
| put call | 0.0 |
| implied vol | 6.2 |
| max pain risk | 3.0 |
| beta | 10.0 |
| debt equity | 4.8 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 5.0 |
| earnings history | 10.0 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 9.3 |
| dividend safety | 5.2 |
Multiple concerning factors. Consider reducing position.
L4:PATH_F_SELLSetupRECOVERY — Death cross but MACD improving, RSI 61
EdgeNO_EDGE — No clear edge identified
SuitabilityAGGRESSIVE — MCap $1.6B<$5B
The F-path SELL output reflects an overall score of 5.1 below the 5.6 soft trigger — multiple weakening dimensions accumulated rather than a single hard-floor breach. The strongest dimension ( Value at 8.1) was not enough to lift the adjusted overall above the threshold. Co-occurring failed gates ( ASYMMETRY:0.3<1.5@spot) reinforce the read. Current asymmetry R:R is 0.26 — supplementary context, not the trigger for this path.
The strongest dimensions are Value at 8.1, Growth at 7.1, and Catalyst at 6.9; the weakest are Technical at 2.5, Peer rank at 3.4, and Risk (lower is worse) at 4.1. The V9 engine flagged 1 failed gate with 2 warnings, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of 0.26 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
Trip ifEPS surprise falls below 0% for 2 consecutive quarters.
Trip ifForward price-to-earnings multiple compresses below 8x as earnings estimates are revised downward by more than 10%.
Trip ifFree cash flow conversion falls below 100% of net income for 2 consecutive quarters.
Trip ifRevenue declines more than 5% year-over-year in any quarter following a disclosed loss of a top-10 customer.