Skip to main content
DVADaVita Inc.Hold5.6·$212.01-0.48%
DVA · Why this verdict

Why DaVita (DVA) is rated HOLD

Updated

Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Show full disclosure ▾

About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.

Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.

Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.

No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.

No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.

Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.

Methodology · Editorial policy & full disclaimer

VerdictHOLD
Overall score5.6/10
ConfidenceMEDIUM
MacroNEUTRAL
TrendMatrix Research · core thesis

Engine thesis — one sentence

DaVita delivers consistent earnings beats and strong cash generation, but the stock has moved above analyst consensus targets and carries concentrated exposure to government reimbursement programs representing roughly two-thirds of revenue; the setup favors waiting for a pullback that restores a more favorable entry.

Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.

Thesis pillars

Approximately 68% of revenue derives from government-based programs including Medicare and Medicare Advantage, meaning any adverse policy change or reimbursement-rate adjustment by government payers could have a disproportionately large impact on profitability.

Stable
Bear case
Expectation
Government-based program revenue mix declines below 65% as commercial payer relationships expand over the next 12 months.

CounterThree beats in the last four quarters — including a 23% positive surprise in the most recent period — demonstrate the company is navigating the current reimbursement environment effectively, and the concentration risk may already be reflected in investor expectations.

Three earnings beats in the last four quarters — including a 23% positive surprise in the most recent reporting period — combined with upward-trending analyst estimates suggest the company is consistently outperforming expectations and building a constructive earnings trajectory.

Stable
Earnings
Expectation
The company delivers at least one additional earnings beat in the next two reporting periods, sustaining the positive surprise pattern.

CounterThe single miss in the last four quarters came in at roughly 21% below estimates, demonstrating that earnings can disappoint sharply; a repeat, particularly in a name carrying 15% short interest, could trigger an outsized negative reaction.

At $209.75, the stock is trading above the analyst consensus target of $207.56, meaning the near-term risk/reward geometry is unfavorable; the setup suggests patience rather than initiating new exposure at current prices.

Stable
Warnings
Expectation
Analyst consensus price targets rise above $230 within two quarterly revision cycles following continued earnings beats, restoring meaningful positive upside.

CounterStrong technical momentum — golden cross, price above all key moving averages, RSI at 68, and rising on-balance volume — suggests institutional buyers continue to push the stock higher and that consensus targets may be stale rather than a binding ceiling.

Free cash flow converts at approximately 128% of net income and the Piotroski F-Score of 7 out of 9 reflects a financially healthy balance sheet; the cash generation quality provides a buffer against potential reimbursement headwinds.

Stable
Quality breakdown
Expectation
FCF-to-net-income conversion ratio stays above 100% for the next four quarters, confirming that cash generation remains resilient.

CounterGross margins score among the weakest components of the quality assessment; if reimbursement conditions tighten, the FCF conversion advantage could narrow quickly, limiting the financial buffer the current quality metrics appear to provide.

Per-dimension breakdown

Value

7.1/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
P/E6.3
P/S9.7
EV/EBITDA5.9
Fwd P/E8.9
PEG9.0
Analyst target3.0
  • Forward P/E: 12.4x
  • PEG: 0.66
  • Attractively valued

Quality

6.0/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
ROE10.0
ROA5.0
Gross margin2.5
Op margin5.5
Net margin2.8
Current ratio5.3
FCF quality9.3
Moat5.4
Piotroski F7.8
  • Excellent ROE: 81%
  • Excellent cash conversion: 128% FCF/NI
  • No competitive moat
  • Strong Piotroski F-Score: 7/9

Growth

7.0/10data confidence 67%
ComponentSub-score
Rev growth4.0
EPS growth10.0

Momentum

6.3/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
RSI3.8
MACD8.5
OBV10.0
MA position9.0
Volume0.0
  • Overbought (RSI 85)
  • Volume accumulation (rising OBV)
  • Above 200-day MA

Sentiment

4.8/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
Analyst rating5.0
Price target3.7
erm sentiment5.8

Insider

3.0/10data confidence 75%
ComponentSub-score
materiality2.0
insider conviction2.0
holder change5.1
  • Heavy insider selling — $200,133,610 (1.464% of mkt cap)

Peer rank

4.3/10data confidence 80%
ComponentSub-score
value rank5.2
quality rank7.6
growth rank4.4
  • Superior ROE vs peers

Technical

4.7/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
bollinger1.9
support resistance1.1
52w position9.7
gap6.0

Risk (lower is worse)

4.6/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
short interest2.6
days to cover6.0
volatility6.2
put call5.3
implied vol6.2
max pain risk3.0
beta7.6
debt equity0.0
  • Above max pain $65
  • Concentration risks: 2 HIGH, 1 MED (10-K Item 1A — sized via position_sizing, validated via buy_confidence)

Catalyst

5.7/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
erm6.5
earnings history6.7
earnings timing5.0
surprise avg4.5
  • Strong earnings: 3B/1M

How the verdict was assembled

Engine trigger

Multiple concerning factors. Consider reducing position. | News modifier +1 (SELL_IF_HOLDING → HOLD_IF_HOLDING).

Engine technical detail
verdict_path: L4:PATH_F_SELL|L3:NEWS_MOD=+1
Passed (7)
  • MOMENTUM:6.3>=5.5
  • INSIDER:OK
  • 8K:CLEAN
  • NEWS_EVENTS:NONE_RECENT
  • EARNINGS_PROXIMITY:41d clear
  • SEMI_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
  • MATERIALS_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
Failed (1)
  • ASYMMETRY:-1.7=NEGATIVE
Warning (0)

none

Reward-to-Risk
-1.71
Upside
-20.6%
Downside
12.1%
Sizing output
AVOID

SetupUNKNOWN No clear chart pattern; technical signals are mixed

EdgeNO_EDGE No clear edge identified

SuitabilityMODERATE Balanced profile

Investment implication

The F-path SELL output reflects an overall score of 4.1 below the 5.4 soft trigger — multiple weakening dimensions accumulated rather than a single hard-floor breach. The strongest dimension ( Value at 7.1) was not enough to lift the adjusted overall above the threshold. Co-occurring failed gates ( ASYMMETRY:-1.7=NEGATIVE) reinforce the read. Current asymmetry R:R is -1.71 — supplementary context, not the trigger for this path.

The strongest dimensions are Value at 7.1, Growth at 7.0, and Momentum at 6.3; the weakest are Insider at 3.0, Peer rank at 4.3, and Risk (lower is worse) at 4.6. The V9 engine flagged 1 failed gate, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of -1.71 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.

What would invalidate the thesis

Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.

  • P1Approximately 68% of revenue derives from government-based programs including Medicare and Medicare Advantage, meaning any adverse policy change or reimbursement-rate adjustment by government payers could have a disproportionately large impact on profitability.

    Trip ifGovernment-based program revenue falls below 60% of total revenue for 2 consecutive reporting periods.

  • P2Three earnings beats in the last four quarters — including a 23% positive surprise in the most recent reporting period — combined with upward-trending analyst estimates suggest the company is consistently outperforming expectations and building a constructive earnings trajectory.

    Trip ifEPS surprise falls below 0% for 2 consecutive quarters, ending the recent beat cadence.

  • P3At $209.75, the stock is trading above the analyst consensus target of $207.56, meaning the near-term risk/reward geometry is unfavorable; the setup suggests patience rather than initiating new exposure at current prices.

    Trip ifAnalyst consensus price target rises above $235 within 4 quarterly revision cycles, restoring more than 12% upside from current price.

  • P4Free cash flow converts at approximately 128% of net income and the Piotroski F-Score of 7 out of 9 reflects a financially healthy balance sheet; the cash generation quality provides a buffer against potential reimbursement headwinds.

    Trip ifFCF-to-net-income conversion ratio falls below 80% for 2 consecutive quarters.

Engine reasoning is mechanically derived from pipeline gate outputs. See decision view.

Home Stocks DVA Why this verdict