Skip to main content
CDRECadre Holdings, Inc.Buy Wait6.0·$28.75+4.43%
CDRE · Why this verdict

Why Cadre Holdings (CDRE) is rated BUY WAIT

Updated

Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Show full disclosure ▾

About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.

Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.

Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.

No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.

No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.

Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.

Methodology · Editorial policy & full disclaimer

VerdictBUY WAIT
Overall score6.0/10
ConfidenceMEDIUM
MacroNEUTRAL
TrendMatrix Research · core thesis

Engine thesis — one sentence

An attractively valued aerospace-and-defense supplier with roughly 40% upside to analyst consensus and a strong earnings track record sits in a confirmed technical downtrend that currently blocks new entry; if the stock stabilizes and the moving-average structure recovers, the valuation and earnings fundamentals argue for a meaningful re-rating.

Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.

Thesis pillars

The stock trades at a forward price-to-earnings multiple of approximately 20 times with a PEG ratio of 0.29, while analyst consensus implies roughly 40% upside to fair value — a gap that is unusually wide for an industrial business with a demonstrated earnings track record, and that the risk/reward geometry of approximately 7-to-1 in favor of the upside confirms.

Stable
Price targets
Expectation
Price moves toward the analyst consensus target, capturing at least 20% of the 40% upside gap within 12 months as the fundamental re-rating materializes.

CounterA wide gap between current price and analyst targets can persist or widen in a confirmed downtrend; if the technical deterioration attracts additional selling, the valuation gap may expand before it closes, representing a prolonged value trap rather than a near-term opportunity.

The company has beaten earnings estimates in three of the past four quarters with an average positive surprise of approximately 27%, including a near-doubling of the consensus estimate in the most recent quarter — a pattern consistent with management consistently under-promising and over-delivering relative to Street expectations.

Stable
Earnings
Expectation
The beat rate is sustained, with EPS beating consensus by more than 10% in at least 2 of the next 4 quarters.

CounterThe one quarter that missed during the past four came in approximately 37% below consensus, demonstrating that when the company misses, the magnitude can be significant; the high-beta profile and small market capitalization amplify earnings risk in both directions.

A death-cross formation, the stock trading below all major moving averages, an RSI of 40, and falling on-balance volume together indicate that the dominant market structure remains one of selling, and capital entering now is fighting the primary trend.

Stable
Engine gate (failed)
Expectation
Price crosses above the 200-day moving average and MACD turns positive for 2 consecutive months, confirming that the downtrend has reversed and the technical backdrop supports accumulation.

CounterWith RSI at 40 the stock may be approaching technical exhaustion; the extremely low put/call ratio of 0.14 suggests minimal hedging activity, which can indicate that bears are already fully positioned and incremental downside pressure may be limited.

A debt-to-equity ratio of 1.2 commits a meaningful portion of the company's cash flow to servicing obligations rather than growth investment or shareholder returns, and leaves less cushion to absorb a softening in government procurement volumes.

Stable
Bear case
Expectation
Debt-to-equity ratio falls below 0.8 over the next 4 quarters as cash generation is directed toward debt reduction.

CounterA forward P/E of 20 times and PEG of 0.29 imply the market does not view the leverage as distress-level; in an aerospace and defense business with relatively stable government contract revenues, moderate leverage is often serviceable and does not materially impair the investment case.

Per-dimension breakdown

Value

7.2/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
P/E4.0
P/S9.1
EV/EBITDA2.6
Fwd P/E6.6
PEG10.0
Analyst target9.0
  • Forward P/E: 19.3x
  • PEG: 0.27
  • Attractively valued

Quality

5.1/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
ROE3.8
ROA4.2
Gross margin4.4
Op margin3.6
Net margin2.9
Current ratio7.8
FCF quality4.9
Moat5.6
Piotroski F8.9
  • Earnings quality warning: 64% FCF/NI
  • Strong Piotroski F-Score: 8/9

Growth

8.7/10data confidence 67%
ComponentSub-score
Rev growth7.4
EPS growth10.0

Momentum

3.9/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
RSI4.5
MACD0.3
OBV10.0
MA position1.5
Volume3.3
  • Volume accumulation (rising OBV)
  • Below 200-MA, MA slope flat

Sentiment

7.0/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
Analyst rating5.0
Price target9.8
erm sentiment6.8
  • Analyst upside: 63%

Insider

5.0/10data confidence 50%
ComponentSub-score
materiality5.0
holder change5.0
  • No net insider activity — $0 (0.000% of mkt cap)

Peer rank

4.3/10data confidence 80%
ComponentSub-score
value rank7.2
quality rank4.7
growth rank5.3

Technical

5.2/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
bollinger6.9
support resistance6.9
52w position1.8

Risk (lower is worse)

4.5/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
short interest6.7
days to cover5.9
volatility0.0
put call7.8
implied vol1.0
beta5.7
debt equity4.7
  • High IV: 74%

Catalyst

6.7/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
erm6.5
earnings history6.7
earnings timing5.0
surprise avg10.0
dividend safety5.5
  • Strong earnings: 3B/1M
  • Dividend: 142.0%

How the verdict was assembled

Engine trigger

Maintain position. Not compelling to add more. | News modifier +1 (HOLD_IF_HOLDING → STRONG_BUY_WAIT).

Engine technical detail
verdict_path: L4:PATH_F_HOLD|L3:NEWS_MOD=+1
Passed (7)
  • ASYMMETRY:4.1>=1.5
  • INSIDER:OK
  • 8K:CLEAN
  • NEWS_EVENTS:NONE_RECENT
  • EARNINGS_PROXIMITY:41d clear
  • SEMI_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
  • MATERIALS_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
Failed (2)
  • MOMENTUM:3.9<4.5
  • DEATH_CROSS:HARD_BLOCK
Warning (0)

none

Reward-to-Risk
4.06
Upside
+41.6%
Downside
10.3%
Sizing output
STARTER

SetupRANGE_BOUND RSI 47 mid-range, Bollinger mid-band

EdgeNO_EDGE No clear edge identified

SuitabilityAGGRESSIVE Beta 1.31>1.3, MCap $1.2B<$5B

Investment implication

None of the engine's positive-conviction paths (C-quality, D-momentum) triggered — the F-path HOLD reflects balanced signals. Strongest-cleared gate: ASYMMETRY:4.1>=1.5. Top dim: Growth at 8.7; weakest: Momentum at 3.9. No conviction either direction.

The strongest dimensions are Growth at 8.7, Value at 7.2, and Sentiment at 7.0; the weakest are Momentum at 3.9, Peer rank at 4.3, and Risk (lower is worse) at 4.5. The V9 engine flagged 2 failed gates, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of 4.06 and an engine sizing output of STARTER.

What would invalidate the thesis

Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.

  • P1The stock trades at a forward price-to-earnings multiple of approximately 20 times with a PEG ratio of 0.29, while analyst consensus implies roughly 40% upside to fair value — a gap that is unusually wide for an industrial business with a demonstrated earnings track record, and that the risk/reward geometry of approximately 7-to-1 in favor of the upside confirms.

    Trip ifAnalyst consensus price target falls below $33, compressing implied upside to less than 15% from current levels.

  • P2The company has beaten earnings estimates in three of the past four quarters with an average positive surprise of approximately 27%, including a near-doubling of the consensus estimate in the most recent quarter — a pattern consistent with management consistently under-promising and over-delivering relative to Street expectations.

    Trip ifEPS surprise falls below 0% for 2 consecutive quarters.

  • P3A death-cross formation, the stock trading below all major moving averages, an RSI of 40, and falling on-balance volume together indicate that the dominant market structure remains one of selling, and capital entering now is fighting the primary trend.

    Trip ifPrice crosses above the 200-day moving average and holds above it for 2 consecutive months.

  • P4A debt-to-equity ratio of 1.2 commits a meaningful portion of the company's cash flow to servicing obligations rather than growth investment or shareholder returns, and leaves less cushion to absorb a softening in government procurement volumes.

    Trip ifDebt-to-equity ratio falls below 0.8 for 2 consecutive quarters.

Engine reasoning is mechanically derived from pipeline gate outputs. See decision view.

Home Stocks CDRE Why this verdict