Skip to main content
BUSEFirst Busey CorporationHold6.1·$29.34+0.31%
BUSE · Why this verdict

Why First Busey (BUSE) is rated HOLD

Updated

Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Show full disclosure ▾

About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.

Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.

Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.

No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.

No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.

Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.

Methodology · Editorial policy & full disclaimer

VerdictHOLD
Overall score6.1/10
ConfidenceMEDIUM
MacroNEUTRAL
TrendMatrix Research · core thesis

Engine thesis — one sentence

First Busey has delivered four consecutive earnings beats averaging 7% above consensus at a forward multiple of 10.4x and a Piotroski F-Score of 8 out of 9, signaling an attractively valued, financially sound franchise; however, with only 0.9% headroom to the near-term resistance target and a reward-to-risk ratio of 0.21-to-1, the current price offers far more downside than upside and the position does not warrant adding to at present.

Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.

Thesis pillars

The bank has beaten consensus earnings estimates in each of the last four quarters, with the average upside running roughly 7% above the Street's forecast — a pattern consistent with management guiding conservatively and repeatedly clearing that bar.

Stable
Earnings
Expectation
The beat streak extends for at least two additional quarters, with the average earnings surprise remaining above 3% over the next 12 months.

CounterA sustained four-quarter beat record tends to pull analyst estimates higher; if the Street revises its forecast up toward the bank's actual earnings power, the surprise cushion compresses and the stock loses its primary re-rating catalyst.

A forward price-to-earnings multiple of 10.4x and a PEG ratio of 0.89 price in only modest growth expectations against a backdrop of strong earnings delivery, leaving meaningful room for valuation expansion if the earnings trajectory holds.

Stable
Valuation breakdown
Expectation
The forward multiple expands toward 12x over the next 12 months as continued earnings outperformance draws institutional attention to the value gap.

CounterRegional bank multiples are structurally compressed by rate-cycle sensitivity and the overhead of regulatory scrutiny; a forward multiple near 10x may simply reflect the sector's chronic discount rather than a specific mispricing worth arbitraging.

With only 0.9% headroom to the near-term resistance target and a reward-to-risk ratio of 0.21-to-1, the current entry offers materially more downside than upside, making new purchases unattractive regardless of the underlying quality story.

Stable
Price targets
Expectation
A pullback of at least 3% from current levels resets the asymmetry toward a more favorable entry geometry over the next 12 months.

CounterThe stock trades above all key moving averages with constructive momentum — sustained buying pressure can push prices through technical ceilings, rendering the current resistance level moot if the next earnings report beats by a wide margin.

A Piotroski F-Score of 8 out of 9 signals broad financial strength across profitability, leverage, and operating efficiency, indicating the bank is in a fundamentally improving cycle rather than a deteriorating one.

Stable
Quality breakdown
Expectation
The Piotroski F-Score remains at 7 or above for the next four quarters, confirming the financial health signal is durable rather than transient.

CounterThe bank carries one high and two medium regulatory concentration risks tied to Federal Reserve oversight; a single adverse supervisory determination could impair key profitability or leverage metrics and cause the F-Score to drop without warning.

Per-dimension breakdown

Value

7.3/10data confidence 83%
ComponentSub-score
P/E8.6
P/S8.2
Fwd P/E9.2
PEG7.5
Analyst target3.0
  • Forward P/E: 10.8x
  • PEG: 0.92
  • Attractively valued

Quality

5.5/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
ROE3.1
ROA0.8
Gross margin0.0
Op margin10.0
Net margin10.0
Moat5.4
Piotroski F8.9
  • Strong margins: 28%
  • No competitive moat
  • Strong Piotroski F-Score: 8/9

Growth

7.2/10data confidence 67%
ComponentSub-score
Rev growth10.0
EPS growth4.3
  • Strong growth: 143% YoY

Momentum

6.2/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
RSI4.2
MACD8.0
OBV10.0
MA position9.0
Volume0.0
  • Overbought (RSI 76)
  • Volume accumulation (rising OBV)
  • Above 200-day MA

Sentiment

4.9/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
Analyst rating5.0
Price target4.8
erm sentiment5.0

Insider

5.0/10data confidence 50%
ComponentSub-score
materiality5.0
holder change5.0
  • Negligible insider selling — $76,546 (0.003% of mkt cap)

Peer rank

6.4/10data confidence 80%
ComponentSub-score
value rank7.5
quality rank3.3
growth rank9.9
  • Industry growth leader

Technical

3.6/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
bollinger0.5
support resistance0.4
52w position9.9

Risk (lower is worse)

6.5/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
short interest7.9
days to cover4.7
volatility8.0
put call10.0
implied vol3.2
max pain risk3.0
beta8.7
  • High IV: 61%
  • Above max pain $18
  • Concentration risks: 1 HIGH, 2 MED (10-K Item 1A — sized via position_sizing, validated via buy_confidence)

Catalyst

6.2/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
erm5.0
earnings history10.0
earnings timing5.0
surprise avg6.0
dividend safety4.8
  • Perfect beat streak: 4Q
  • Yield trap warning: high yield but unsafe

How the verdict was assembled

Engine trigger

Maintain position. Not compelling to add more.

Engine technical detail
verdict_path: L4:PATH_F_HOLD
Passed (6)
  • MOMENTUM:6.2>=5.5
  • INSIDER:OK
  • NEWS_EVENTS:NONE_RECENT
  • EARNINGS_PROXIMITY:33d clear
  • SEMI_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
  • MATERIALS_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
Failed (1)
  • ASYMMETRY:-1.6=NEGATIVE
Warning (1)
  • 8K_CSUITE_CHANGE:5.02 (officer departure/appointment)
Reward-to-Risk
-1.58
Upside
-14.4%
Downside
9.1%
Sizing output
AVOID

SetupUNKNOWN No clear chart pattern; technical signals are mixed

EdgeNO_EDGE No clear edge identified

SuitabilityAGGRESSIVE MCap $2.5B<$5B

Investment implication

None of the engine's positive-conviction paths (C-quality, D-momentum) triggered — the F-path HOLD reflects balanced signals. Strongest-cleared gate: MOMENTUM:6.2>=5.5. Top dim: Value at 7.3; weakest: Technical at 3.6. No conviction either direction.

The strongest dimensions are Value at 7.3, Growth at 7.2, and Risk (lower is worse) at 6.5; the weakest are Technical at 3.6, Sentiment at 4.9, and Insider at 5.0. The V9 engine flagged 1 failed gate with 1 warning, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of -1.58 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.

What would invalidate the thesis

Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.

  • P1The bank has beaten consensus earnings estimates in each of the last four quarters, with the average upside running roughly 7% above the Street's forecast — a pattern consistent with management guiding conservatively and repeatedly clearing that bar.

    Trip ifEPS surprise falls below 0% for 2 consecutive quarters.

  • P2A forward price-to-earnings multiple of 10.4x and a PEG ratio of 0.89 price in only modest growth expectations against a backdrop of strong earnings delivery, leaving meaningful room for valuation expansion if the earnings trajectory holds.

    Trip ifConsensus forward EPS estimates are revised downward by more than 15% over any 2-quarter period, eroding the forward multiple advantage.

  • P3With only 0.9% headroom to the near-term resistance target and a reward-to-risk ratio of 0.21-to-1, the current entry offers materially more downside than upside, making new purchases unattractive regardless of the underlying quality story.

    Trip ifPrice breaks above $28.52 on above-average volume and holds for 2 consecutive weeks, invalidating the resistance ceiling.

  • P4A Piotroski F-Score of 8 out of 9 signals broad financial strength across profitability, leverage, and operating efficiency, indicating the bank is in a fundamentally improving cycle rather than a deteriorating one.

    Trip ifPiotroski F-Score drops below 6 for 2 consecutive quarters.

Engine reasoning is mechanically derived from pipeline gate outputs. See decision view.

Home Stocks BUSE Why this verdict