Value
9.1/10data confidence 67%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/S | 9.2 |
| Fwd P/E | 8.1 |
| PEG | 10.0 |
| Analyst target | 9.0 |
- ▸Forward P/E: 14.7x
- ▸PEG: 0.09
- ▸Attractively valued
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
Alphatec Holdings presents an unusual combination: three consecutive reported earnings beats with over 130% average positive surprise, a PEG ratio of 0.08, more than 75% upside to analyst targets, and positive free cash flow despite GAAP losses — but an extreme put-to-call ratio of 23.50, a confirmed declining long-term price trend, and a high-severity supplier concentration risk temper near-term conviction, warranting a cautious watch rather than immediate entry.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
Despite reporting GAAP losses, the company generates a positive free cash flow margin of 7% and a free cash flow yield of 4.3%, indicating that operating cash generation is healthier than headline net income suggests. Quality breakdown | Free cash flow margin expanding above 10% over the next 12 months would confirm that the divergence between GAAP losses and actual cash generation is widening favorably. | →Stable |
| CounterPositive free cash flow from a GAAP-loss business can reflect working capital timing rather than durable operating strength; if revenue growth slows, the free cash flow margin could quickly turn negative. | ||
Three of the four most recently reported quarters show positive earnings surprises with an average upside of over 130%, indicating a pattern of consistently delivering above analyst expectations across multiple reporting periods. Earnings | A fourth consecutive positive earnings surprise in the next reported quarter would deepen confidence that the beat pattern is structural rather than episodic. | →Stable |
| CounterThe high average positive surprise may reflect a period of deliberately conservative analyst expectations that are now being reset upward, making future beats harder to achieve even if underlying operations remain sound. | ||
The stock trades at a forward price-to-earnings multiple of 14.4 times and a PEG ratio of 0.08, while analyst price targets imply more than 75% upside from current levels — suggesting the market has not yet fully credited the growth trajectory. Valuation breakdown | Analyst price target consensus rising above $18 would reflect growing recognition of the growth potential and validate the valuation gap thesis. | →Stable |
| CounterIf the growth rate underpinning the low PEG decelerates — for example, due to reimbursement headwinds or competitive pressure — the multiple would compress toward fair value, making the current price look full rather than cheap. | ||
A put-to-call ratio of 23.50 is extreme and reflects deeply bearish options market positioning; separately, a single HIGH-severity supplier concentration risk identified in regulatory filings creates a tail risk that could disrupt operations without an alternative supply agreement in place. Risk breakdown | The put-to-call ratio compressing below 5.00 from the current 23.50 and the supplier concentration risk being mitigated via a secondary supply agreement would signal both sentiment and operational risk have normalized. | →Stable |
| CounterExtreme put-to-call ratios in small-cap names can reflect thinly traded options with limited open interest rather than genuine directional conviction, and may overstate the degree of actual bearish sentiment. | ||
The 200-day moving average is sloping downward at over 5% per month and the stock trades below it, indicating a confirmed declining long-term price trend despite improving near-term momentum indicators. Momentum breakdown | The stock recovering above its 200-day moving average with the slope turning positive over 20 consecutive trading days would signal the long-term trend has reversed. | →Stable |
| CounterNear-term momentum has recovered to above the constructive threshold, and if the earnings beat streak continues, the price could reclaim the 200-day moving average faster than the current slope implies. | ||
CounterPositive free cash flow from a GAAP-loss business can reflect working capital timing rather than durable operating strength; if revenue growth slows, the free cash flow margin could quickly turn negative.
CounterThe high average positive surprise may reflect a period of deliberately conservative analyst expectations that are now being reset upward, making future beats harder to achieve even if underlying operations remain sound.
CounterIf the growth rate underpinning the low PEG decelerates — for example, due to reimbursement headwinds or competitive pressure — the multiple would compress toward fair value, making the current price look full rather than cheap.
CounterExtreme put-to-call ratios in small-cap names can reflect thinly traded options with limited open interest rather than genuine directional conviction, and may overstate the degree of actual bearish sentiment.
CounterNear-term momentum has recovered to above the constructive threshold, and if the earnings beat streak continues, the price could reclaim the 200-day moving average faster than the current slope implies.
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/S | 9.2 |
| Fwd P/E | 8.1 |
| PEG | 10.0 |
| Analyst target | 9.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROA | 0.0 |
| Gross margin | 10.0 |
| Op margin | 0.0 |
| Net margin | 0.0 |
| Current ratio | 6.7 |
| FCF quality | 4.9 |
| Moat | 6.5 |
| Rule of 40 | 3.0 |
| Piotroski F | 6.7 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 5.9 |
| EPS growth | 10.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 3.0 |
| MACD | 8.8 |
| OBV | 10.0 |
| MA position | 4.0 |
| Volume | 10.0 |
| vol acceleration | 8.6 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Analyst rating | 5.0 |
| Price target | 10.0 |
| erm sentiment | 5.1 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| materiality | 6.5 |
| insider conviction | 6.5 |
| holder change | 5.1 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 7.3 |
| quality rank | 1.8 |
| growth rank | 6.5 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 1.1 |
| support resistance | 2.7 |
| 52w position | 0.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 5.5 |
| days to cover | 8.3 |
| volatility | 0.0 |
| put call | 10.0 |
| implied vol | 1.4 |
| max pain risk | 7.0 |
| beta | 7.8 |
| debt equity | 0.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 5.0 |
| earnings history | 10.0 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 10.0 |
Multiple concerning factors. Consider reducing position.
L4:PATH_F_SELLnone
SetupRECOVERY — Death cross but MACD improving, RSI 71
EdgeNO_EDGE — No clear edge identified
SuitabilityAGGRESSIVE — MCap $1.3B<$5B
The F-path SELL output reflects an overall score of 4.8 below the 5.6 soft trigger — multiple weakening dimensions accumulated rather than a single hard-floor breach. The strongest dimension ( Value at 9.1) was not enough to lift the adjusted overall above the threshold. Current asymmetry R:R is 4.48 — supplementary context, not the trigger for this path.
The strongest dimensions are Value at 9.1, Growth at 8.0, and Catalyst at 7.5; the weakest are Technical at 1.3, Peer rank at 3.9, and Quality at 4.2. The V9 engine cleared all gates with 2 warnings, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of 4.48 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
Trip ifEPS surprise falls below 0% for 2 consecutive reported quarters.
Trip ifForward price-to-earnings multiple expands above 25x from the current 14.4x, indicating the market has priced in the growth trajectory.
Trip ifFree cash flow margin falls below 0% for 2 consecutive quarters.
Trip ifPut/call ratio compresses below 5.00 from the current 23.50.
Trip ifStock closes above its 200-day moving average for more than 20 consecutive trading days with the MA slope turning positive.