Skip to main content
AAONAAON, Inc.Sell5.0·$136.79+3.94%
AAON · Why this verdict

Why AAON (AAON) is rated SELL

Updated

Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Show full disclosure ▾

About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.

Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.

Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.

No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.

No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.

Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.

Methodology · Editorial policy & full disclaimer

VerdictSELL
Overall score5.0/10
ConfidenceMEDIUM
MacroNEUTRAL
TrendMatrix Research · core thesis

Engine thesis — one sentence

AAON is a strong-growth building-products business delivering 54% revenue growth with upward earnings estimate revisions, but the stock trades at a forward P/E of 39.9x — a demanding valuation premium — while free cash flow is deeply negative relative to net income, price momentum is weakening via volume distribution, and the options market is pricing elevated downside hedging activity.

Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.

Thesis pillars

At a forward P/E of 39.9x and a PEG of 3.94, the stock screens as expensive relative to its growth outlook, pricing in a persistently high growth rate that leaves limited margin of safety if execution falters.

Stable
Valuation breakdown
Expectation
Forward P/E compresses below 25x as earnings growth accelerates faster than the share price, improving the reward-to-risk geometry.

CounterA company posting 54% revenue growth with rising earnings estimates can plausibly sustain a premium valuation for several quarters if the growth rate holds — expensive on current earnings does not imply expensive on earnings two years forward if the trajectory continues.

Revenue grew 54% year-over-year and earnings estimates are trending upward, suggesting the company is in a genuine acceleration phase where analysts are still revising their expectations higher.

Stable
Bull case
Expectation
Consensus earnings estimates revise upward by at least 10% over the next 2 quarters, and revenue growth sustains above 25% YoY.

CounterAt a forward P/E of 39.9x and a PEG of 3.94, the growth premium is already fully embedded in the price; any growth disappointment may trigger a sharp de-rating rather than a gentle correction, particularly given the alternating beat-miss earnings pattern over the last four quarters.

Free cash flow is deeply negative relative to net income — at -182% — meaning the company is not converting reported earnings into real cash, a red flag on earnings quality that undermines confidence in the stated profitability level.

Stable
Quality breakdown
Expectation
FCF relative to net income improves above -80% for 2 consecutive quarters, indicating earnings are beginning to translate into cash generation.

CounterThe Piotroski F-Score of 7 out of 9 reflects a broadly healthy financial structure on other dimensions; if the negative FCF is transient rather than structural, the quality concern may prove to be a temporary dislocation that resolves as revenue scale builds.

While the stock trades above its 200-day moving average, on-balance volume is falling — a divergence suggesting that sellers are quietly distributing shares even as price holds its broader trend support, and momentum reads below the level that would confirm a healthy technical setup.

Stable
Momentum breakdown
Expectation
On-balance volume reverses to rising for 4 consecutive weeks and RSI crosses above 55, confirming renewed buying interest and validating a recovery in technical momentum.

CounterTrading above the 200-day moving average is a constructive signal in its own right; if fundamentals continue to improve and earnings estimates keep rising, the volume divergence may quickly resolve in the bulls' favor and the distribution signal proves short-lived.

Per-dimension breakdown

Value

2.6/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
P/E0.4
P/S5.7
EV/EBITDA0.0
Fwd P/E2.8
PEG3.1
Analyst target3.0
  • Forward P/E: 40.0x
  • PEG: 3.96
  • Expensive valuation

Quality

4.6/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
ROE4.5
ROA4.6
Gross margin1.2
Op margin4.6
Net margin3.7
Current ratio8.9
FCF quality0.0
Moat6.1
Piotroski F7.8
  • Earnings quality RED FLAG: -182% FCF/NI
  • Strong Piotroski F-Score: 7/9

Growth

9.7/10data confidence 67%
ComponentSub-score
Rev growth10.0
EPS growth9.4
  • Strong growth: 54% YoY

Momentum

4.1/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
RSI5.5
MACD0.0
OBV6.0
MA position9.0
Volume0.0
  • Above 200-day MA

Sentiment

5.5/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
Analyst rating5.0
Price target5.7
erm sentiment6.0

Insider

3.4/10data confidence 75%
ComponentSub-score
materiality3.0
insider conviction2.0
holder change5.1
  • Notable insider selling — $22,671,001 (0.210% of mkt cap)

Peer rank

3.5/10data confidence 80%
ComponentSub-score
value rank0.3
quality rank4.3
growth rank9.5
  • Industry growth leader

Technical

5.3/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
bollinger4.0
support resistance4.1
52w position8.3
gap5.0

Risk (lower is worse)

5.6/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
short interest6.6
days to cover7.4
volatility0.0
put call10.0
implied vol1.6
beta5.4
debt equity8.1
  • High IV: 70%

Catalyst

5.3/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
erm6.5
earnings history3.3
earnings timing5.0
surprise avg6.3
dividend safety5.2
  • Earnings concerns: 2B/2M
  • Dividend: 30.0%

How the verdict was assembled

Engine trigger

Multiple concerning factors. Consider reducing position.

Engine technical detail
verdict_path: L4:PATH_F_SELL
Passed (5)
  • INSIDER:OK
  • NEWS_EVENTS:NONE_RECENT
  • EARNINGS_PROXIMITY:45d clear
  • SEMI_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
  • MATERIALS_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
Failed (2)
  • MOMENTUM:4.1<4.5
  • ASYMMETRY:-0.8=NEGATIVE
Warning (1)
  • 8K_CSUITE_CHANGE:5.02 (officer departure/appointment)
Reward-to-Risk
-0.82
Upside
-11.3%
Downside
13.7%
Sizing output
AVOID

SetupRANGE_BOUND RSI 45 mid-range, Bollinger mid-band

EdgeNO_EDGE No clear edge identified

SuitabilityAGGRESSIVE Beta 1.40>1.3

Investment implication

The F-path SELL output reflects an overall score of 5.0 below the 5.6 soft trigger — multiple weakening dimensions accumulated rather than a single hard-floor breach. The strongest dimension ( Growth at 9.7) was not enough to lift the adjusted overall above the threshold. Co-occurring failed gates ( MOMENTUM:4.1<4.5, ASYMMETRY:-0.8=NEGATIVE) reinforce the read. Current asymmetry R:R is -0.82 — supplementary context, not the trigger for this path.

The strongest dimensions are Growth at 9.7, Risk (lower is worse) at 5.6, and Sentiment at 5.5; the weakest are Value at 2.6, Insider at 3.4, and Peer rank at 3.5. The V9 engine flagged 2 failed gates with 1 warning, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of -0.82 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.

What would invalidate the thesis

Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.

  • P1Revenue grew 54% year-over-year and earnings estimates are trending upward, suggesting the company is in a genuine acceleration phase where analysts are still revising their expectations higher.

    Trip ifRevenue growth falls below 25% YoY for 2 consecutive quarters.

  • P2At a forward P/E of 39.9x and a PEG of 3.94, the stock screens as expensive relative to its growth outlook, pricing in a persistently high growth rate that leaves limited margin of safety if execution falters.

    Trip ifForward P/E compresses below 25x for 2 consecutive quarters, reversing the expensive-valuation concern.

  • P3Free cash flow is deeply negative relative to net income — at -182% — meaning the company is not converting reported earnings into real cash, a red flag on earnings quality that undermines confidence in the stated profitability level.

    Trip ifFree cash flow improves above -80% of net income for 2 consecutive quarters.

  • P4While the stock trades above its 200-day moving average, on-balance volume is falling — a divergence suggesting that sellers are quietly distributing shares even as price holds its broader trend support, and momentum reads below the level that would confirm a healthy technical setup.

    Trip ifRSI crosses above 55 for 2 consecutive weeks while on-balance volume reverses to rising.

Engine reasoning is mechanically derived from pipeline gate outputs. See decision view.

Home Stocks AAON Why this verdict