Value
8.2/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 8.9 |
| P/S | 9.5 |
| EV/EBITDA | 7.5 |
| Fwd P/E | 9.6 |
| PEG | 8.3 |
| Analyst target | 6.0 |
- ▸Forward P/E: 8.1x
- ▸PEG: 0.79
- ▸Attractively valued
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
Verizon posts a strong Piotroski F-Score of 7 out of 9, reflecting solid operating margins and financial discipline that underpin the sustainability of its dividend in the near term. Quality breakdown | The Piotroski F-Score stays at or above 6 out of 9 through the next annual reporting cycle. | →Stable |
| CounterFalling on-balance-volume and weak growth scores suggest deteriorating market confidence, and high debt levels limit financial flexibility if conditions tighten. | ||
Verizon has beaten consensus earnings estimates in 3 of the last 4 quarters, with an average positive surprise of 2.88%, suggesting management's ability to meet and exceed expectations in a mature, low-growth industry. Earnings | Verizon continues beating quarterly EPS estimates by at least 2% on average over the next 12 months. | →Stable |
| CounterBeat streaks in low-growth telecoms often reflect conservative guidance management rather than fundamental improvement; revenue growth remains weak and may erode earnings quality. | ||
At a forward P/E of 8.9x and PEG ratio of 0.88, Verizon is priced attractively relative to its earnings power, suggesting the stock offers value even in a slow-growth telecom environment. Valuation breakdown | The forward P/E remains below 12x and the stock appreciates toward analyst consensus price targets over the next 12 months. | →Stable |
| CounterLow valuations in mature telecoms often reflect structural headwinds including heavy capital expenditure requirements and debt burdens; Verizon's debt-to-equity ratio contributes a quality penalty. | ||
With a current reward-to-risk ratio of only 0.37 and upside to the take-profit level of just 1.9%, the near-term risk-reward profile is unfavorable and limits the case for adding exposure at current prices. Targets | If the stock pulls back, the reward-to-risk ratio rises above 1.5 and a better entry emerges within 12 months. | →Stable |
| CounterInvestors seeking income rather than capital appreciation may accept the low upside in exchange for the dividend yield, keeping the stock supported near current levels. | ||
CounterFalling on-balance-volume and weak growth scores suggest deteriorating market confidence, and high debt levels limit financial flexibility if conditions tighten.
CounterBeat streaks in low-growth telecoms often reflect conservative guidance management rather than fundamental improvement; revenue growth remains weak and may erode earnings quality.
CounterLow valuations in mature telecoms often reflect structural headwinds including heavy capital expenditure requirements and debt burdens; Verizon's debt-to-equity ratio contributes a quality penalty.
CounterInvestors seeking income rather than capital appreciation may accept the low upside in exchange for the dividend yield, keeping the stock supported near current levels.
Verizon trades at a compelling valuation with a forward P/E near 9x and a PEG of 0.88, supported by a strong 3-of-4 earnings beat streak, though limited near-term upside and a negative reward-to-risk ratio constrain the investment case today.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 8.9 |
| P/S | 9.5 |
| EV/EBITDA | 7.5 |
| Fwd P/E | 9.6 |
| PEG | 8.3 |
| Analyst target | 6.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 5.7 |
| ROA | 3.4 |
| Gross margin | 7.8 |
| Op margin | 10.0 |
| Net margin | 6.2 |
| Current ratio | 2.6 |
| FCF quality | 7.7 |
| Moat | 5.8 |
| Piotroski F | 7.8 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 3.2 |
| EPS growth | 2.9 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 3.5 |
| MACD | 0.0 |
| OBV | 1.0 |
| MA position | 2.2 |
| Volume | 8.3 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| LLM sentiment | 5.0 |
| Analyst rating | 7.5 |
| Price target | 7.9 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| materiality | 5.0 |
| holder change | 5.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 4.4 |
| quality rank | 6.9 |
| growth rank | 4.4 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 9.4 |
| support resistance | 7.6 |
| 52w position | 6.7 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 8.9 |
| days to cover | 6.7 |
| volatility | 3.9 |
| put call | 10.0 |
| implied vol | 3.4 |
| beta | 10.0 |
| debt equity | 3.2 |
| news risk | 3.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 5.0 |
| earnings history | 10.0 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 4.2 |
| dividend safety | 5.5 |
| news activity | 8.0 |
Multiple concerning factors. Consider reducing position.
L4:PATH_F_SELLSetup— — No clear chart pattern; technical signals are mixed
EdgeCatalyst-Driven — Earnings in 21d with 4/4 beat streak
SuitabilityModerate — Balanced profile
The F-path SELL output reflects an overall score of 4.5 below the 5.6 soft trigger — multiple weakening dimensions accumulated rather than a single hard-floor breach. The strongest dimension ( Value at 8.2) was not enough to lift the adjusted overall above the threshold. Co-occurring failed gates ( MOMENTUM:3.0<4.5, ASYMMETRY:1.4<1.5@spot) reinforce the read. Current asymmetry R:R is 1.42 — supplementary context, not the trigger for this path.
The strongest dimensions are Value at 8.2, Technical at 7.9, and Sentiment at 6.8; the weakest are Momentum at 3.0, Growth at 3.0, and Peer rank at 3.9. The V9 engine flagged 2 failed gates with 1 warning, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of 1.42 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
Trip ifEPS surprise falls below 0% in at least 2 of the next 4 quarters.
Trip ifForward P/E rises above 14x, indicating valuation expansion has removed the margin of safety.
Trip ifPiotroski F-Score drops below 5 out of 9 in the next annual period.
Trip ifStock price rises above $50 without a proportional increase in analyst price targets, leaving reward-to-risk below 0.3.