Americas
“10-K Item 1: '62% was transacted in the Americas'”
Updated
The most significant concentration Vertiv Holdings discloses is Americas at 62%, classified HIGH by disclosed size. Below: the full set from the latest 10-K — verbatim quotes, filing references, and a synthesis of what these exposures mean together.
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
Source: Vertiv Holdings’s SEC Form 10-K filed — view the filing on SEC EDGAR ↗
Each card carries a disclosed-size chip (HIGH / MEDIUM / LOW — how large the exposure is as a share of revenue, not how dangerous it is) and a nature tag: Built-in(the company’s own model, geography, or products) or Outside party (an external customer, supplier, or distributor it relies on).
“10-K Item 1: '62% was transacted in the Americas'”
“10-K Item 1A: 'We obtain certain materials or components from single-source suppliers due to technology, availability, price, quality or other considerations.'”
The company's concentration profile combines a geographic revenue tilt and a supply-chain dependency, both of which are high-share by disclosed size. On the geographic side, 62% of transactions were in the Americas — a high-share, structural exposure reflecting where the company's data center infrastructure customer base is concentrated. The structural character means this is an inherent feature of the business footprint rather than a contractual dependency on any individual customer, though it does tie a large share of results to Americas capital spending cycles for data center infrastructure. On the supply side, certain materials and components are obtained from single-source suppliers — a high-share dependency exposure. The disclosed rationale for sole sourcing includes technology, availability, price, quality, and other considerations, meaning these relationships are not always replaceable even in principle by finding alternative vendors. A single-source supplier disruption can affect production across the relevant product lines with limited near-term mitigation, particularly for components where the qualification of alternatives is time-consuming. The two exposures operate on different time horizons: the geographic concentration is a macro-level variable that moves with Americas data center investment cycles, while the supply-chain dependency is an event-driven, idiosyncratic risk tied to specific vendor relationships. Neither mitigates the other. On balance, the combination of a high-share geographic concentration and high-share single-source supply dependency makes both dimensions worth tracking closely, with supply continuity representing the more acute event risk.
For the engine’s reasoning on VRT’s current verdict — including which dimensions drove the score — see the per-dimension breakdown.
| Symbol | Name | HIGH | MEDIUM | LOW | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AYI | Acuity Inc. | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| AEIS | Advanced Energy Industries, Inc | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| VRT● | Vertiv Holdings, LLC | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| ATKR | Atkore Inc. | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| BE | Bloom Energy Corporation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| AMPX | Amprius Technologies, Inc. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Concentration counts reflect items disclosed in each peer’s most recent 10-K; disclosed-size classification uses TrendMatrix’s internal 10-K extraction taxonomy.