synthetic yarn suppliers
“10-K Item 1: 'For yarn, we principally rely upon two major global suppliers, but we also have a significant relationship with one other supplier.'”
Updated
The most significant concentration Interface discloses is synthetic yarn suppliers, classified HIGH by disclosed size. Below: the full set from the latest 10-K — verbatim quotes, filing references, and a synthesis of what these exposures mean together.
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
Source: Interface’s SEC Form 10-K filed — view the filing on SEC EDGAR ↗
Each card carries a disclosed-size chip (HIGH / MEDIUM / LOW — how large the exposure is as a share of revenue, not how dangerous it is) and a nature tag: Built-in(the company’s own model, geography, or products) or Outside party (an external customer, supplier, or distributor it relies on).
“10-K Item 1: 'For yarn, we principally rely upon two major global suppliers, but we also have a significant relationship with one other supplier.'”
“10-K Item 1A: 'We depend on a small number of third-party suppliers of synthetic fiber and are largely dependent upon a primary supplier for our LVT products.'”
“10-K Item 1A: 'In 2025, 2024, and 2023 approximately 43%, 43%, and 46% of our net sales, respectively, and a significant portion of our production were outside the United States, primarily in Europe and Asia-Pacific.'”
Interface's concentration risks sit mainly on the supply side, at high disclosed share. For yarn, the company principally relies upon two major global suppliers, with a significant relationship on one additional supplier, a high-share dependency exposure. Separately, the company depends on a small number of third-party suppliers of synthetic fiber and is largely dependent upon a primary supplier for its LVT products, another high-share dependency exposure. On the demand side, approximately 43% of net sales, along with a significant portion of production, came from outside the United States, primarily Europe and Asia-Pacific — a medium-share structural geographic exposure. The two supplier exposures compound each other since they both touch core material inputs (yarn and synthetic fiber/LVT components) with limited alternative sourcing disclosed, meaning a disruption at any one supplier could affect production across multiple product lines simultaneously. The international sales exposure is a separate, structural risk tied to where the company sells rather than where it sources, and is disclosed at a smaller share than either supplier dependency. Overall, supply-side dependency is the more concentrated and higher-share risk here, while the geographic sales mix represents a more moderate, structural diversification consideration.
For the engine’s reasoning on TILE’s current verdict — including which dimensions drove the score — see the per-dimension breakdown.
| Symbol | Name | HIGH | MEDIUM | LOW | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TILE● | Interface, Inc. | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| ALH | Alliance Laundry Holdings Inc. | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| LEG | Leggett & Platt, Incorporated | 1 | 3 | 0 | 4 |
| LZB | La-Z-Boy Incorporated | 1 | 3 | 0 | 4 |
| ETD | Ethan Allen Interiors Inc. | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| HNI | HNI Corporation | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Concentration counts reflect items disclosed in each peer’s most recent 10-K; disclosed-size classification uses TrendMatrix’s internal 10-K extraction taxonomy.