Value
3.9/10data confidence 50%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 1.3 |
| P/S | 9.3 |
| Analyst target | 3.0 |
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
The company has missed earnings in all of the last 3 reported quarters with zero beats, and an average surprise of -41.99%, per the catalyst notes. Catalyst breakdown | The company should return to at least 1 beat out of the next 4 quarters, with average surprise turning positive. | →Stable |
| CounterA clean miss streak this consistent suggests structural estimate-setting problems or genuine operating deterioration, not a one-off stumble. | ||
Quality score of 1.7 sits below the engine's 4.0 floor, with an earnings-quality red flag showing FCF at -478% of net income and a weak Piotroski F-Score of 3 out of 9. Quality breakdown | Quality score should climb toward 4.0 over 12 months if FCF conversion normalizes and the Piotroski score improves. | →Stable |
| CounterAn FCF/NI ratio this negative could reflect one-off working-capital or restructuring charges rather than a persistent structural problem. | ||
Revenue is declining 3% year-over-year, a headwind reflected directly in the engine's growth score. Growth breakdown | Revenue growth should turn positive over the next 12 months if same-store sales trends recover. | →Stable |
| CounterA modest -3% decline for a restaurant chain could reflect temporary same-store sales softness rather than a structural demand problem. | ||
Short interest is elevated at 22% of float, which the engine judges as justified given the fundamental picture, alongside high implied volatility of 96%. Risk breakdown | Short interest should decline below 15% of float over the next 12 months if the fundamental picture stabilizes. | →Stable |
| CounterExtremely high short interest also creates squeeze risk — any positive surprise could force rapid short covering and a sharp price spike. | ||
Insider signal is BULLISH, with 30 buy transactions against only 2 sells and net insider buying of 578,114 shares over the trailing 90 days. Insider | The insider signal should stay BULLISH with continued net buying over the next 12 months. | →Stable |
| CounterA large count of small insider buy transactions can reflect routine equity compensation vesting rather than a strong conviction signal, especially against a backdrop of consecutive earnings misses. | ||
CounterA clean miss streak this consistent suggests structural estimate-setting problems or genuine operating deterioration, not a one-off stumble.
CounterAn FCF/NI ratio this negative could reflect one-off working-capital or restructuring charges rather than a persistent structural problem.
CounterA modest -3% decline for a restaurant chain could reflect temporary same-store sales softness rather than a structural demand problem.
CounterExtremely high short interest also creates squeeze risk — any positive surprise could force rapid short covering and a sharp price spike.
CounterA large count of small insider buy transactions can reflect routine equity compensation vesting rather than a strong conviction signal, especially against a backdrop of consecutive earnings misses.
Sweetgreen shows a red-flag earnings-quality signal with declining revenue and a string of earnings misses, and carries high short interest, but heavy insider buying stands in contrast to the otherwise bearish fundamental picture.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 1.3 |
| P/S | 9.3 |
| Analyst target | 3.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 1.2 |
| ROA | 0.0 |
| Gross margin | 0.0 |
| Op margin | 0.0 |
| Net margin | 1.2 |
| Current ratio | 5.8 |
| FCF quality | 0.0 |
| Moat | 3.9 |
| Piotroski F | 3.3 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 1.8 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 5.5 |
| MACD | 1.8 |
| OBV | 1.0 |
| MA position | 3.0 |
| Volume | 0.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Analyst rating | 5.0 |
| Price target | 4.8 |
| erm sentiment | 5.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| materiality | 5.0 |
| holder change | 5.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 3.2 |
| quality rank | 2.3 |
| growth rank | 0.6 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 8.0 |
| support resistance | 6.4 |
| 52w position | 0.0 |
| gap | 5.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 1.3 |
| days to cover | 7.8 |
| volatility | 0.0 |
| put call | 9.9 |
| implied vol | 0.0 |
| max pain risk | 3.0 |
| beta | 2.8 |
| debt equity | 6.6 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 5.0 |
| earnings history | 0.0 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 0.0 |
Quality below minimum threshold.
L1:HARD_BLOCKnone
Setup— — No clear chart pattern; technical signals are mixed
EdgeNo clear edge — No clear edge identified
SuitabilitySpeculative — Drawdown -52% (>40% off 52w high)
The L1 gate blocked the positive-verdict path: a hard-floor threshold was breached, so dimensional pillars — including Insider at 5.0 could not lift the engine output above the verdict floor. Failed gate signal: MOMENTUM:2.3<4.5.
The strongest dimensions are Insider at 5.0, Sentiment at 4.9, and Technical at 4.8; the weakest are Quality at 1.7, Growth at 1.8, and Momentum at 2.3. The V9 engine flagged 2 failed gates, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of -0.93 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
Trip ifFCF/NI stays below -200% for 2 more consecutive quarters, or the Piotroski F-Score falls below 4.
Trip ifRevenue decline exceeds 5% YoY for 2 more consecutive quarters.
Trip ifThe company posts a 4th consecutive miss, or the average surprise stays below -25%.
Trip ifShort interest rises above 30% of float, or implied volatility exceeds 130%.
Trip ifNet insider selling exceeds 100,000 shares in a rolling 90-day window, or the signal turns BEARISH, within the next 2 quarters.