Skip to main content
SEICSEI Investments CompanySell6.1·$91.43+1.53%
SEIC · Why this verdict

Why SEI Investments (SEIC) is rated SELL

Updated

Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Show full disclosure ▾

About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.

Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.

Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.

No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.

No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.

Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.

Methodology · Editorial policy & full disclaimer

VerdictSELL
Overall score6.1/10
ConfidenceMEDIUM
MacroNEUTRAL

Thesis pillars

The company scores 8.3 out of 10 on business quality — the highest quality score in this batch — with a 30% return on equity, 31% net margins, and a wide economic moat designation, reflecting durable competitive advantages in investment management platforms and outsourced services.

Stable
Quality breakdown
Expectation
Quality score remains above 7.5 and return on equity stays above 25% in at least 3 of the next 4 reported quarters.

CounterAsset management businesses see quality metrics compress when markets decline, as revenue is fee-based and tied to assets under management; a sustained equity market correction of 20% or more would reduce fees and margins proportionally.

The company beat earnings estimates in all 4 of the last 4 quarters with an average positive surprise of 16.3%, including a standout 48.8% beat in July 2025 that indicates strong operating leverage and consistent execution above analyst expectations.

Stable
Earnings
Expectation
The earnings beat streak extends to at least 6 consecutive quarters with an average positive surprise above 5%.

CounterThe 48.8% beat in July 2025 may be a one-quarter anomaly from a specific performance fee or asset realization; removing that outlier, the average surprise would be much lower and less distinctive as a signal.

With only 1.8% upside to the analyst target of $91.23 from the current $89.57, and the reward-to-risk ratio at 0.5, the stock is priced to perfection at current levels, reducing the attractiveness of new entries even though the fundamental quality is excellent.

Stable
Warnings
Expectation
Analyst consensus price target rises above $105, more than 17% above the current $89.57, as continued beat-and-raise quarters prompt upward estimate revisions.

CounterIn high-quality compounder businesses, analyst targets are routinely exceeded and revised upward; the current thin upside may simply reflect the pace of target revision lagging actual business performance.

The company ranks in the top third of its peer group on value, quality, and growth simultaneously — a rare combination in asset management — with a 7.1 out of 10 growth peer rank score reflecting that it is growing faster than most competitors while maintaining premium profitability.

Stable
Peer-rank breakdown
Expectation
The company maintains top-tercile peer ranking on at least 2 of the 3 peer rank dimensions over the next 12 months.

CounterAsset management is a highly competitive sector with low barriers to entry for index-based products; the peer ranking advantage may erode as passive investing continues to shift fee pools away from active managers where SEI operates.

TrendMatrix Research · core thesis

Engine thesis — one sentence

SEI Investments has delivered 4 consecutive earnings beats including a 48.8% beat, carries a 30% return on equity with a wide economic moat and top-tier quality score of 8.3 out of 10, but the stock has effectively reached its analyst target with only 1.8% remaining upside, limiting the near-term setup despite strong fundamentals.

Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.

Per-dimension breakdown

Value

5.8/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
P/E7.8
P/S7.1
EV/EBITDA2.6
Fwd P/E8.4
PEG4.8
Analyst target4.0
  • Forward P/E: 13.8x
  • PEG: 1.73

Quality

8.3/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
ROE9.9
ROA9.3
Gross margin10.0
Op margin10.0
Net margin10.0
Current ratio8.5
FCF quality4.3
Moat7.5
Rule of 405.5
Piotroski F7.8
  • Excellent ROE: 30%
  • Strong margins: 31%
  • Earnings quality warning: 55% FCF/NI
  • Wide economic moat

Growth

5.8/10data confidence 67%
ComponentSub-score
Rev growth5.7
EPS growth5.9

Momentum

7.0/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
RSI5.0
MACD7.0
OBV10.0
MA position9.0
Volume4.0
  • Volume accumulation (rising OBV)
  • Above 200-day MA

Sentiment

5.7/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
Analyst rating5.0
Price target7.1
erm sentiment5.0

Insider

3.9/10data confidence 75%
ComponentSub-score
materiality4.5
insider conviction2.0
holder change5.1
  • Modest insider selling — $6,258,153 (0.057% of mkt cap)

Peer rank

6.0/10data confidence 80%
ComponentSub-score
value rank5.2
quality rank7.3
growth rank7.8
  • Superior ROE vs peers

Technical

3.8/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
bollinger0.7
support resistance0.9
52w position9.7

Risk (lower is worse)

6.8/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
short interest9.0
days to cover6.9
volatility6.5
put call10.0
implied vol5.2
beta7.2
debt equity2.5

Catalyst

7.0/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
erm5.0
earnings history10.0
earnings timing5.0
surprise avg10.0
dividend safety5.2
  • Perfect beat streak: 4Q
  • Dividend: 114.0%

How the verdict was assembled

Engine trigger

Multiple concerning factors. Consider reducing position.

Engine technical detail
verdict_path: L4:PATH_F_SELL
Passed (7)
  • MOMENTUM:7.0>=5.5
  • INSIDER:OK
  • 8K:CLEAN
  • NEWS_EVENTS:NONE_RECENT
  • EARNINGS_PROXIMITY:19d clear
  • SEMI_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
  • MATERIALS_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
Failed (1)
  • ASYMMETRY:-0.0=NEGATIVE
Warning (0)

none

Reward-to-Risk
-0.04
Upside
-0.2%
Downside
6.0%
Sizing output
AVOID

SetupBreakout Golden cross, above all MAs, RSI 61, MACD bullish

EdgeCatalyst-Driven Earnings in 19d with 4/4 beat streak

SuitabilityModerate Balanced profile

Investment implication

The F-path SELL output reflects an overall score of 4.6 below the 5.6 soft trigger — multiple weakening dimensions accumulated rather than a single hard-floor breach. The strongest dimension ( Quality at 8.3) was not enough to lift the adjusted overall above the threshold. Co-occurring failed gates ( ASYMMETRY:-0.0=NEGATIVE) reinforce the read. Current asymmetry R:R is -0.04 — supplementary context, not the trigger for this path.

The strongest dimensions are Quality at 8.3, Momentum at 7.0, and Catalyst at 7.0; the weakest are Technical at 3.8, Insider at 3.9, and Sentiment at 5.7. The V9 engine flagged 1 failed gate, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of -0.04 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.

What would invalidate the thesis

Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.

  • P1Wide Moat Elite Quality Score

    Trip ifQuality score falls below 7.0 or return on equity drops below 20%, declining more than 10 percentage points from the current 30% level.

  • P2Consistent Earnings Beats

    Trip ifEPS surprise falls below 0% in at least 2 of the next 4 quarters, breaking the 4-quarter beat streak.

  • P3Analyst Target Reached Thin Upside

    Trip ifAnalyst consensus price target rises above $100, more than 11% above the current $89.57, confirming upward estimate revision momentum.

  • P4Peer Leading Metrics Across Dimensions

    Trip ifPeer rank on quality falls below the 50th percentile for more than 2 consecutive quarters, indicating competitors are closing the quality gap.

Engine reasoning is mechanically derived from pipeline gate outputs. See decision view.

Home Stocks SEIC Why this verdict