Value
9.6/10data confidence 67%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 9.6 |
| P/S | 10.0 |
| EV/EBITDA | 7.1 |
| PEG | 10.0 |
- ▸PEG: 0.03
- ▸Attractively valued
SEB · Why this verdict
Why Seaboard (SEB) is rated SELL
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Show full disclosure ▾Hide full disclosure ▴
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
VerdictSELL
Overall score5.7/10
ConfidenceMEDIUM
MacroNEUTRAL
Thesis pillars
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
Business quality is 3.4 out of 10 with zero gross margin score, near-zero operating margins, negative free cash flow at -43% of net income, and no identified competitive moat, indicating the company is not generating economic returns on invested capital at current operations. Bear case | Quality score improves above 4.0 within 12 months as gross margins recover from near-zero levels. | →Stable |
| CounterFood processing and shipping are inherently low-margin businesses where the quality score's absolute level is less meaningful than stability; a 3.4 quality score in a stable conglomerate may be a permanent feature rather than a cyclical trough. | ||
The stock has a PEG ratio of 0.03 and scores near the maximum on every value dimension, placing it among the cheapest stocks in the industrial conglomerate sector by almost any measure at the current price of $5,198. Valuation breakdown | Price rises above $5,800, more than 11% above the current $5,198, within 12 months as the valuation discount attracts event-driven or value-focused investors. | →Stable |
| CounterAt $5,198 per share with minimal analyst coverage, Seaboard is effectively uninvestable for most institutional investors; the cheap valuation may persist indefinitely given the liquidity constraints and lack of analyst coverage driving price discovery. | ||
Revenue declined 6.7% year over year with high leverage at 2.6x debt-to-equity, triggering two of five value-trap indicators — a combination that historically is associated with stocks where the cheap multiple persists or worsens rather than converging toward fair value. Warnings | Revenue decline narrows to less than 2% year over year or turns positive in the next reported annual period, disconfirming the value trap thesis. | →Stable |
| CounterIndustrial conglomerates with commodity exposure often see revenue declines lag commodity price recovery by 1-2 quarters; a stabilization in the commodities that Seaboard's pork processing and ocean shipping divisions are exposed to could reverse the trend quickly. | ||
Price momentum is strong at 7.7 out of 10 with rising on-balance volume and the stock above its 200-day moving average, while the earnings history shows 3 beats in 4 quarters with an exceptional average positive surprise of 62.2% in the available data. Catalyst breakdown | Momentum score remains above 6.0 and the stock continues to hold above its 200-day moving average for the next 90 days. | →Stable |
| CounterThe earnings history data shown is from 2014-2015, which is over a decade old and may not reflect the current operational environment; the beat streak may not be representative of the recent business trajectory. | ||
Business quality is 3.4 out of 10 with zero gross margin score, near-zero operating margins, negative free cash flow at -43% of net income, and no identified competitive moat, indicating the company is not generating economic returns on invested capital at current operations.
→StableBear case
- Expectation
- Quality score improves above 4.0 within 12 months as gross margins recover from near-zero levels.
CounterFood processing and shipping are inherently low-margin businesses where the quality score's absolute level is less meaningful than stability; a 3.4 quality score in a stable conglomerate may be a permanent feature rather than a cyclical trough.
The stock has a PEG ratio of 0.03 and scores near the maximum on every value dimension, placing it among the cheapest stocks in the industrial conglomerate sector by almost any measure at the current price of $5,198.
→StableValuation breakdown
- Expectation
- Price rises above $5,800, more than 11% above the current $5,198, within 12 months as the valuation discount attracts event-driven or value-focused investors.
CounterAt $5,198 per share with minimal analyst coverage, Seaboard is effectively uninvestable for most institutional investors; the cheap valuation may persist indefinitely given the liquidity constraints and lack of analyst coverage driving price discovery.
Revenue declined 6.7% year over year with high leverage at 2.6x debt-to-equity, triggering two of five value-trap indicators — a combination that historically is associated with stocks where the cheap multiple persists or worsens rather than converging toward fair value.
→StableWarnings
- Expectation
- Revenue decline narrows to less than 2% year over year or turns positive in the next reported annual period, disconfirming the value trap thesis.
CounterIndustrial conglomerates with commodity exposure often see revenue declines lag commodity price recovery by 1-2 quarters; a stabilization in the commodities that Seaboard's pork processing and ocean shipping divisions are exposed to could reverse the trend quickly.
Price momentum is strong at 7.7 out of 10 with rising on-balance volume and the stock above its 200-day moving average, while the earnings history shows 3 beats in 4 quarters with an exceptional average positive surprise of 62.2% in the available data.
→StableCatalyst breakdown
- Expectation
- Momentum score remains above 6.0 and the stock continues to hold above its 200-day moving average for the next 90 days.
CounterThe earnings history data shown is from 2014-2015, which is over a decade old and may not reflect the current operational environment; the beat streak may not be representative of the recent business trajectory.
TrendMatrix Research · core thesis
Engine thesis — one sentence
Seaboard Corporation is an industrial conglomerate trading at a near-maximum value score with a PEG of 0.03, but below-minimum business quality at 3.4 out of 10, revenue declining 6.7% year over year, and leverage at 2.6x debt-to-equity — a combination of signals that makes the cheap valuation potentially a value trap rather than a true opportunity.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
Per-dimension breakdown
Quality
3.4/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 3.9 |
| ROA | 1.5 |
| Gross margin | 0.0 |
| Op margin | 1.6 |
| Net margin | 3.0 |
| Current ratio | 8.1 |
| FCF quality | 0.0 |
| Moat | 4.5 |
| Piotroski F | 7.8 |
- ▸Earnings quality RED FLAG: -43% FCF/NI
- ▸No competitive moat
- ▸Strong Piotroski F-Score: 7/9
Growth
6.7/10data confidence 67%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 3.4 |
| EPS growth | 10.0 |
Momentum
1.2/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 3.0 |
| MACD | 0.0 |
| OBV | 1.0 |
| MA position | 2.2 |
| Volume | 0.0 |
- ▸Capitulation risk (RSI 15, below 200MA)
- ▸Volume distribution (falling OBV)
- ▸Below 200-MA but MA still rising (+4.2%/30d) — pullback in uptrend, not confirmed weakness
Sentiment
5.0/10data confidence 33%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Analyst rating | 5.0 |
Insider
5.0/10data confidence 50%Peer rank
5.7/10data confidence 80%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 8.4 |
| quality rank | 4.6 |
| growth rank | 5.0 |
- ▸Attractive P/E vs peers
Technical
7.8/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 9.4 |
| support resistance | 9.6 |
| 52w position | 4.5 |
Risk (lower is worse)
6.4/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 4.7 |
| days to cover | 8.6 |
| volatility | 0.3 |
| beta | 10.0 |
| debt equity | 8.6 |
Catalyst
6.7/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| earnings history | 6.7 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 10.0 |
| dividend safety | 5.2 |
- ▸Strong earnings: 3B/1M
- ▸Dividend: 21.0%
How the verdict was assembled
Engine trigger
Quality below minimum threshold.
Engine technical detail
verdict_path:
L1:HARD_BLOCKPassed (6)
- INSIDER:OK
- 8K:CLEAN
- NEWS_EVENTS:NONE_RECENT
- EARNINGS_PROXIMITY:23d clear
- SEMI_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
- MATERIALS_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
Failed (1)
- MOMENTUM:1.2<4.5
Warning (1)
- ASYMMETRY:UPSIDE_EXHAUSTED (upside=0.0%)
Reward-to-Risk
0.00
Upside
+0.0%
Downside
9.8%
Sizing output
AVOID
Setup— — No clear chart pattern; technical signals are mixed
EdgeCatalyst-Driven — Earnings in 23d with 3/4 beat streak
SuitabilityAggressive — MCap $4.2B<$5B
Investment implication
The L1 gate blocked the positive-verdict path: a hard-floor threshold was breached, so dimensional pillars — including Value at 9.6 could not lift the engine output above the verdict floor. Failed gate signal: MOMENTUM:1.2<4.5.
The strongest dimensions are Value at 9.6, Technical at 7.8, and Growth at 6.7; the weakest are Momentum at 1.2, Quality at 3.4, and Insider at 5.0. The V9 engine flagged 1 failed gate with 1 warning, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of 0.00 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
What would invalidate the thesis
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
- P1Deep Value Cheap Multiple
Trip ifStock price falls below $4,800, more than 7% below the current $5,198, indicating value investors are not stepping in despite the cheap multiple.
- P2Revenue Decline Value Trap Risk
Trip ifRevenue declines by more than 10% year over year, worse than the current -6.7% rate, indicating accelerating deterioration.
- P3Quality Below Minimum Threshold
Trip ifQuality score falls below 3.0 or debt-to-equity rises above 3.5, increasing by more than 0.9 turns from the current 2.6x level.
- P4Positive Momentum With Earnings Strength
Trip ifMomentum score falls below 5.0 or price drops below the 200-day moving average for more than 30 consecutive trading days.