Value
6.2/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 0.0 |
| P/S | 9.4 |
| EV/EBITDA | 5.3 |
| Fwd P/E | 7.3 |
| PEG | 10.0 |
| Analyst target | 4.0 |
- ▸Forward P/E: 17.1x
- ▸PEG: 0.03
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
Short interest at 42% of the float is an extreme reading, indicating that nearly half of available shares are held by investors expecting a price decline, which creates persistent downward pressure and elevated borrowing costs for longs. Key risks | Short interest declines below 25% as short sellers cover positions following a sustained period of positive operational results. | →Stable |
| CounterExtreme short interest can set up a powerful short squeeze if catalysts emerge, meaning the downward pressure could reverse violently to the upside. | ||
A debt-to-equity ratio of 1.9 has triggered a quality penalty in the assessment, and with a return on equity of near zero and gross margins well below sector averages, the overall quality score of 4.0 sits right at the minimum acceptable threshold. Bear case | Debt-to-equity ratio falls below 1.5 within 2 years as cash generation is applied to debt reduction, improving quality metrics above the floor. | →Stable |
| CounterConsumer staples businesses with recurring revenue can comfortably sustain higher leverage ratios given predictable cash flows, and the current debt level may be intentional capital structure optimization. | ||
Primo Brands converts free cash flow at 708% of net income, one of the highest ratios in the dataset, signaling that reported earnings substantially understate actual cash generation capacity of the business. Quality breakdown | Free cash flow remains above 300% of net income in the next annual reporting period, confirming structural cash generation strength rather than a one-time event. | →Stable |
| CounterAn FCF-to-net-income ratio this extreme often reflects non-cash accounting charges distorting net income rather than genuinely superior cash production, and the ratio could normalize quickly. | ||
At $24.60, the stock has essentially reached its price target of $24.65 with upside of only 0.2% and a risk-reward ratio of 0.03, meaning the entry timing is maximally unfavorable at the current price level. Warnings | Analyst consensus price target rises above $30 within 12 months, restoring a positive reward-to-risk ratio above 1.5. | →Stable |
| CounterAnalyst targets for beverage companies are often conservative and may lag actual operational improvements, with upgrades possible after the next catalyst. | ||
CounterExtreme short interest can set up a powerful short squeeze if catalysts emerge, meaning the downward pressure could reverse violently to the upside.
CounterConsumer staples businesses with recurring revenue can comfortably sustain higher leverage ratios given predictable cash flows, and the current debt level may be intentional capital structure optimization.
CounterAn FCF-to-net-income ratio this extreme often reflects non-cash accounting charges distorting net income rather than genuinely superior cash production, and the ratio could normalize quickly.
CounterAnalyst targets for beverage companies are often conservative and may lag actual operational improvements, with upgrades possible after the next catalyst.
Primo Brands Corporation generates exceptional free cash flow at 708% of net income and scores a 7/9 Piotroski F-Score, but 42% short interest, a debt-to-equity ratio that reduces quality, and a stock already at its price target leave no entry room at current prices.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 0.0 |
| P/S | 9.4 |
| EV/EBITDA | 5.3 |
| Fwd P/E | 7.3 |
| PEG | 10.0 |
| Analyst target | 4.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 0.8 |
| ROA | 2.7 |
| Gross margin | 2.2 |
| Op margin | 4.4 |
| Net margin | 0.4 |
| Current ratio | 3.9 |
| FCF quality | 10.0 |
| Moat | 3.8 |
| Piotroski F | 7.8 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 2.7 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 5.5 |
| MACD | 4.0 |
| OBV | 10.0 |
| MA position | 9.0 |
| Volume | 3.1 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| LLM sentiment | 3.0 |
| Analyst rating | 5.0 |
| Price target | 6.3 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| materiality | 5.0 |
| holder change | 10.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 4.1 |
| quality rank | 0.0 |
| growth rank | 1.5 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 2.6 |
| support resistance | 2.2 |
| 52w position | 5.9 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 0.0 |
| days to cover | 0.0 |
| volatility | 4.7 |
| put call | 9.1 |
| implied vol | 1.2 |
| max pain risk | 3.0 |
| beta | 8.7 |
| debt equity | 3.1 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 5.0 |
| earnings history | 5.6 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 5.4 |
| dividend safety | 3.5 |
| news activity | 5.0 |
Multiple concerning factors. Consider reducing position.
L4:PATH_F_SELLnone
Setup— — No clear chart pattern; technical signals are mixed
EdgeNo clear edge — No clear edge identified
SuitabilityModerate — Balanced profile
The F-path SELL output reflects an overall score of 3.6 below the 5.6 soft trigger — multiple weakening dimensions accumulated rather than a single hard-floor breach. The strongest dimension ( Insider at 7.5) was not enough to lift the adjusted overall above the threshold. Co-occurring failed gates ( ASYMMETRY:-0.6=NEGATIVE, NEWS_SOFT:LEADERSHIP_CHANGE) reinforce the read. Current asymmetry R:R is -0.56 — supplementary context, not the trigger for this path.
The strongest dimensions are Insider at 7.5, Momentum at 6.3, and Value at 6.2; the weakest are Peer rank at 1.8, Growth at 2.7, and Technical at 3.6. The V9 engine flagged 2 failed gates, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of -0.56 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
Trip ifFree cash flow drops below 100% of net income in any reported annual period.
Trip ifShort interest rises above 50% of float as reported in any bi-monthly short interest filing.
Trip ifDebt-to-equity ratio rises above 2.5 in any reported annual filing.
Trip ifAnalyst consensus price target rises above $30, restoring more than 20% upside from current price levels.