Value
3.6/10data confidence 33%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/S | 0.0 |
| Analyst target | 6.0 |
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
Despite losses at the operating level, Planet Labs generates positive free cash flow (FCF margin of 25%) suggesting the core satellite data subscription model has real cash generation capacity ahead of GAAP profitability. Quality breakdown | Free cash flow margin improves above 30% over 12 months as the subscription base scales without proportional cost increases. | →Stable |
| CounterFCF yield of only 0.8% relative to current market cap means the free cash flow is tiny relative to valuation, and FCF quality score of 6/10 indicates it may not be sustainable. | ||
Planet Labs is growing revenue at 42% year-over-year, placing it in the top growth tier of its peer universe with a growth score of 10/10, suggesting the commercial and government satellite imaging market is expanding rapidly. Growth breakdown | Annual revenue growth remains above 30% for the next 12 months as new satellite constellations expand data delivery capacity. | →Stable |
| CounterRevenue growth alone is insufficient if the company cannot achieve profitability; operating margins remain deeply negative and free cash flow yield sits at only 0.8%. | ||
Planet Labs has beaten earnings estimates twice in the last four reported quarters, with an average positive surprise of 65.64%, demonstrating a pattern of management setting beatable guidance. Earnings | The company continues to beat earnings estimates by at least 20% in the next 2 quarterly reports. | →Stable |
| CounterTwo of the four recent quarters show 'UNKNOWN' actual results suggesting data gaps, and the company still reports negative EPS (-$0.03 actual versus -$0.04 estimate), so beats are relative to a loss baseline. | ||
Short interest of 12% and a put/call ratio of 2.74 reflect significant skepticism from the market, creating both downside pressure and potential for a short squeeze if positive catalysts emerge. Key risks | Short interest falls below 8% over 12 months as the company demonstrates a path to profitability. | →Stable |
| CounterHigh short interest at 12% is often rational positioning against a pre-profitability company with a 105% implied volatility, and a short squeeze without fundamental improvement would be unsustainable. | ||
CounterFCF yield of only 0.8% relative to current market cap means the free cash flow is tiny relative to valuation, and FCF quality score of 6/10 indicates it may not be sustainable.
CounterRevenue growth alone is insufficient if the company cannot achieve profitability; operating margins remain deeply negative and free cash flow yield sits at only 0.8%.
CounterTwo of the four recent quarters show 'UNKNOWN' actual results suggesting data gaps, and the company still reports negative EPS (-$0.03 actual versus -$0.04 estimate), so beats are relative to a loss baseline.
CounterHigh short interest at 12% is often rational positioning against a pre-profitability company with a 105% implied volatility, and a short squeeze without fundamental improvement would be unsustainable.
Planet Labs PBC is a high-growth aerospace imaging company posting 42% revenue growth annually, but its investment thesis is constrained by negative price momentum, an oversold RSI of 25, and elevated short interest of 12% that signal significant near-term risk.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/S | 0.0 |
| Analyst target | 6.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 0.0 |
| ROA | 0.0 |
| Gross margin | 7.1 |
| Op margin | 0.0 |
| Current ratio | 9.4 |
| FCF quality | 6.0 |
| Moat | 5.8 |
| Piotroski F | 6.7 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 10.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 5.5 |
| MACD | 10.0 |
| OBV | 10.0 |
| MA position | 7.0 |
| Volume | 0.3 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| LLM sentiment | 7.9 |
| Analyst rating | 7.0 |
| Price target | 8.3 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| materiality | 4.5 |
| insider conviction | 2.0 |
| holder change | 5.1 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 0.5 |
| quality rank | 0.0 |
| growth rank | 7.9 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 4.6 |
| support resistance | 6.9 |
| 52w position | 2.1 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 3.0 |
| days to cover | 8.1 |
| volatility | 0.0 |
| put call | 0.0 |
| implied vol | 0.0 |
| beta | 3.1 |
| debt equity | 4.8 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 5.0 |
| earnings history | 10.0 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 10.0 |
| news activity | 6.0 |
Extreme risk factors.
L1:HARD_BLOCKnone
SetupRange Bound — RSI 42 mid-range, Bollinger mid-band
EdgeNo clear edge — No clear edge identified
SuitabilityAggressive — Beta 2.07>1.3
The L1 gate blocked the positive-verdict path: a hard-floor threshold was breached, so dimensional pillars — including Growth at 10.0 could not lift the engine output above the verdict floor. Failed gate signal: ASYMMETRY:0.7<1.5@spot.
The strongest dimensions are Growth at 10.0, Sentiment at 7.7, and Catalyst at 7.2; the weakest are Peer rank at 2.1, Risk (lower is worse) at 2.7, and Value at 3.6. The V9 engine flagged 1 failed gate, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of 0.69 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
Trip ifRevenue growth falls below 20% year-over-year for 2 consecutive quarters.
Trip ifEarnings miss consensus EPS estimates by more than 15% in 2 of the next 3 quarters.
Trip ifShort interest rises above 18% of float, signaling increased institutional conviction against the thesis.
Trip ifFree cash flow margin drops below 10% for 2 consecutive quarters.