Value
9.0/10data confidence 33%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/S | 9.0 |
| Analyst target | 9.0 |
- ▸Attractively valued
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
An elevated put/call ratio of 2.00 combined with high implied volatility of 131% signals the market is pricing significant uncertainty into the stock. Risk breakdown | The put/call ratio normalizes below 1.0 as uncertainty resolves. | →Stable |
| CounterHigh implied volatility ahead of an earnings catalyst is normal and doesn't necessarily indicate a bearish skew, especially given the 188% analyst upside. | ||
Opko Health has an identified catalyst edge, with earnings due in 26 days and a 3-of-4 beat streak, alongside an extremely high asymmetry ratio of 12.93 reflecting 144.7% upside versus 11.2% downside. Edge rationale | The company extends its beat streak to at least 4 of the last 5 quarters. | →Stable |
| CounterA wide asymmetry ratio driven by a distant, high analyst price target can be misleading if the target itself is unrealistic relative to the company's declining fundamentals. | ||
Opko is cash-burning at -6% of revenue with a weak Piotroski F-Score of 3/9, driving the quality score below the engine's minimum floor (1.8 vs 4.0). Quality breakdown | The Piotroski F-Score improves to 5/9 or higher as fundamentals stabilize. | →Stable |
| CounterA very low quality score combined with declining revenue could indicate structural business deterioration rather than a temporary rough patch. | ||
Revenue is declining 17% year-over-year, a steep contraction that scores growth at 0.0 out of 10. Growth breakdown | Revenue growth turns positive, exceeding 0% YoY, within the next two quarters. | →Stable |
| CounterA 17% revenue decline in a diagnostics business may reflect a post-pandemic demand normalization rather than a permanent loss of business. | ||
The momentum gate failed at 4.1, just short of the 4.5 threshold, even as on-balance volume shows distribution, or selling pressure. Engine gate (failed) | The momentum score rises above 4.5 as selling pressure eases. | →Stable |
| CounterA momentum score this close to the threshold could clear the bar quickly with only a modest improvement in price action. | ||
CounterHigh implied volatility ahead of an earnings catalyst is normal and doesn't necessarily indicate a bearish skew, especially given the 188% analyst upside.
CounterA wide asymmetry ratio driven by a distant, high analyst price target can be misleading if the target itself is unrealistic relative to the company's declining fundamentals.
CounterA very low quality score combined with declining revenue could indicate structural business deterioration rather than a temporary rough patch.
CounterA 17% revenue decline in a diagnostics business may reflect a post-pandemic demand normalization rather than a permanent loss of business.
CounterA momentum score this close to the threshold could clear the bar quickly with only a modest improvement in price action.
Opko Health shows an extremely favorable risk/reward asymmetry ahead of an upcoming earnings catalyst, but cash burn, a steep revenue decline, and heavy options hedging keep quality deeply below the engine's floor.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/S | 9.0 |
| Analyst target | 9.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 0.0 |
| ROA | 0.0 |
| Gross margin | 0.0 |
| Op margin | 0.0 |
| Net margin | 0.0 |
| Current ratio | 9.4 |
| FCF quality | 0.0 |
| Moat | 3.2 |
| Piotroski F | 3.3 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 0.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 5.0 |
| MACD | 3.9 |
| OBV | 1.0 |
| MA position | 9.0 |
| Volume | 1.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| LLM sentiment | 5.0 |
| Analyst rating | 6.3 |
| Price target | 10.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| materiality | 5.0 |
| holder change | 5.1 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 8.4 |
| quality rank | 1.2 |
| growth rank | 0.6 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 2.9 |
| support resistance | 4.2 |
| 52w position | 8.7 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 6.1 |
| days to cover | 0.0 |
| volatility | 2.1 |
| put call | 0.0 |
| implied vol | 0.0 |
| max pain risk | 3.0 |
| beta | 5.1 |
| debt equity | 8.7 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 6.5 |
| earnings history | 10.0 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 10.0 |
| news activity | 7.0 |
Quality below minimum threshold.
L1:HARD_BLOCKnone
Setup— — No clear chart pattern; technical signals are mixed
EdgeCatalyst-Driven — Earnings in 25d with 3/4 beat streak
SuitabilityAggressive — Beta 1.48>1.3, MCap $1.1B<$5B
The L1 gate blocked the positive-verdict path: a hard-floor threshold was breached, so dimensional pillars — including Value at 9.0 could not lift the engine output above the verdict floor. Failed gate signal: MOMENTUM:4.0<4.5.
The strongest dimensions are Value at 9.0, Catalyst at 7.7, and Sentiment at 7.0; the weakest are Growth at 0.0, Quality at 1.8, and Peer rank at 2.6. The V9 engine flagged 1 failed gate, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of 14.79 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
Trip ifThe company's earnings surprise falls below 0% for 2 consecutive quarters, ending the current 3-of-4 beat streak.
Trip ifPiotroski F-Score falls below 1 out of 9 from the current 3/9.
Trip ifRevenue growth falls below -25% YoY from the current -17% pace.
Trip ifThe momentum score falls below 2.0 out of 10 from the current 4.1.
Trip ifPut/call ratio rises above 4.00 from the current 2.00.