Utah
“10-K Item 1A: 'Texas and Utah, which we estimate represented approximately 42% and 52%, respectively, of Precast net sales for the year ended December 31, 2025'”
Updated
The most significant concentration NWPX Infrastructure discloses is Utah at 52%, classified HIGH by disclosed size. Below: the full set from the latest 10-K — verbatim quotes, filing references, and a synthesis of what these exposures mean together.
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
Source: NWPX Infrastructure’s SEC Form 10-K filed — view the filing on SEC EDGAR ↗
Each card carries a disclosed-size chip (HIGH / MEDIUM / LOW — how large the exposure is as a share of revenue, not how dangerous it is) and a nature tag: Built-in(the company’s own model, geography, or products) or Outside party (an external customer, supplier, or distributor it relies on).
“10-K Item 1A: 'Texas and Utah, which we estimate represented approximately 42% and 52%, respectively, of Precast net sales for the year ended December 31, 2025'”
“10-K Item 1A: 'Texas and Utah, which we estimate represented approximately 42% and 52%, respectively, of Precast net sales for the year ended December 31, 2025'”
NWPX Infrastructure's concentration risk is purely geographic and concentrated within its Precast business. Utah represented approximately 52% of Precast net sales for the year ended December 31, 2025 — a high, structural concentration — while Texas represented approximately 42%, a moderate, structural concentration. Together, these two states account for the substantial majority of Precast net sales, leaving comparatively little of that segment's revenue spread across other geographies. Because both figures are disclosed as structural rather than dependency-driven — reflecting where the company's Precast operations and end-markets happen to be located rather than reliance on any single customer or supplier — the risk here is tied to regional construction activity, infrastructure spending, and economic conditions in Utah and Texas specifically. A slowdown concentrated in either state's construction market would have an outsized effect on Precast segment results given how much of that segment's revenue the two states jointly represent, and Utah's higher share means conditions there are the more consequential of the two to watch. There is no indication in the disclosed claims of a broader geographic footprint within Precast that would cushion a regional downturn in either state.
For the engine’s reasoning on NWPX’s current verdict — including which dimensions drove the score — see the per-dimension breakdown.
| Symbol | Name | HIGH | MEDIUM | LOW | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NWPX● | NWPX Infrastructure, Inc. | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| CLF | Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| MTUS | Metallus Inc. | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| NUE | Nucor Corporation | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| RS | Reliance, Inc. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| STLD | Steel Dynamics, Inc. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Concentration counts reflect items disclosed in each peer’s most recent 10-K; disclosed-size classification uses TrendMatrix’s internal 10-K extraction taxonomy.