Value
5.3/10data confidence 40%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/S | 10.0 |
| EV/EBITDA | 0.6 |
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
Enviri's market cap of $0.58 billion falls below the $1 billion minimum threshold for the investable universe, meaning institutional liquidity is insufficient to support meaningful position sizing without market impact. Warnings | Market cap rises above $1 billion within 12 months as the stock price recovers, restoring eligibility for the investable universe. | →Stable |
| CounterSmall-cap companies below $1 billion can still deliver strong returns if their business fundamentals improve, and an arbitrary size cutoff excludes some of the highest-return opportunities in the market. | ||
Quality scores reflect no competitive moat, concerns across profitability metrics, and a Piotroski F-Score of 4/9, indicating that the business lacks structural advantages that would support a recovery to sustained profitability. Quality breakdown | Piotroski F-Score improves to 6 or higher within 4 reporting quarters as operational metrics recover. | →Stable |
| CounterWaste management businesses often have reliable, recurring revenue streams tied to long-term contracts, and the moat assessment may underweight the sticky customer base and regulatory barriers to entry in the sector. | ||
A put/call ratio of 2.67 indicates that options market participants are buying more than twice as many put options as call options, reflecting a materially bearish institutional view on near-term price performance. Key risks | Put/call ratio falls below 1.5 within 3 months as bearish overhang unwinds following positive operational news. | →Stable |
| CounterElevated put/call ratios in small-cap stocks often reflect a small number of traders hedging specific exposures rather than broad market consensus, making the signal less reliable than in liquid large-cap names. | ||
The last 4 quarters showed 2 beats and 2 misses, with swings ranging from a positive 134% surprise to a negative 600% surprise, indicating that earnings are highly unpredictable and analyst models are unreliable for this business. Earnings | Earnings surprise volatility decreases so that surprises are within plus or minus 30% for at least 3 of the next 4 quarters. | →Stable |
| CounterExtreme earnings volatility may reflect one-time restructuring charges or divestitures rather than operational instability, and the two most recent quarters both beat expectations significantly. | ||
CounterSmall-cap companies below $1 billion can still deliver strong returns if their business fundamentals improve, and an arbitrary size cutoff excludes some of the highest-return opportunities in the market.
CounterWaste management businesses often have reliable, recurring revenue streams tied to long-term contracts, and the moat assessment may underweight the sticky customer base and regulatory barriers to entry in the sector.
CounterElevated put/call ratios in small-cap stocks often reflect a small number of traders hedging specific exposures rather than broad market consensus, making the signal less reliable than in liquid large-cap names.
CounterExtreme earnings volatility may reflect one-time restructuring charges or divestitures rather than operational instability, and the two most recent quarters both beat expectations significantly.
Enviri Corporation is a waste management company with a market cap below the $1 billion investable threshold, mixed earnings history, a very low quality score of 1.6/10, and a high put/call ratio of 2.67, making it unsuitable for the core investment universe at this time.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/S | 10.0 |
| EV/EBITDA | 0.6 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 0.0 |
| ROA | 0.0 |
| Gross margin | 0.0 |
| Op margin | 0.7 |
| Net margin | 0.0 |
| Current ratio | 4.4 |
| Moat | 3.1 |
| Piotroski F | 4.4 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 2.6 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 5.5 |
| MACD | 8.9 |
| OBV | 10.0 |
| MA position | 9.0 |
| Volume | 4.3 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Analyst rating | 5.0 |
| Price target | 4.0 |
| erm sentiment | 5.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| materiality | 5.0 |
| holder change | 5.1 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 8.8 |
| quality rank | 0.0 |
| growth rank | 1.3 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 1.6 |
| support resistance | 1.8 |
| 52w position | 9.2 |
| gap | 5.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| volatility | 0.7 |
| put call | 10.0 |
| implied vol | 3.7 |
| beta | 4.7 |
| debt equity | 0.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 5.0 |
| earnings history | 3.3 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 0.0 |
Quality below minimum threshold.
L1:HARD_BLOCKnone
SetupBreakout — Golden cross, above all MAs, RSI 59, MACD bullish
EdgeNo clear edge — No clear edge identified
SuitabilityAggressive — Beta 1.59>1.3, MCap $0.6B<$5B
The L1 gate blocked the positive-verdict path: a hard-floor threshold was breached, so dimensional pillars — including Momentum at 7.5 could not lift the engine output above the verdict floor. Failed gate signal: ASYMMETRY:-1.4=NEGATIVE.
The strongest dimensions are Momentum at 7.5, Value at 5.3, and Insider at 5.0; the weakest are Quality at 1.6, Growth at 2.6, and Catalyst at 3.3. The V9 engine flagged 1 failed gate, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of -1.40 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
Trip ifMarket cap falls below $400 million, reducing investability further.
Trip ifPiotroski F-Score falls below 3 in any reported quarter.
Trip ifPut/call ratio rises above 4.0 or remains above 2.5 for more than 60 consecutive days.
Trip ifEPS surprise falls below negative 100% in any single quarter, indicating a recurring pattern of large operational misses.