Value
9.9/10data confidence 20%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 9.9 |
- ▸Attractively valued
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
This is a cheaply valued, small-cap name showing a technical breakout, but business quality sits well below the acceptable floor, prompting an exit recommendation despite the favorable price action.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
Quality screens well below the acceptable floor, with no competitive moat identified and a Piotroski F-Score of 0 out of 9, prompting an exit recommendation. Quality breakdown | The Piotroski F-Score should climb well above 0 and the quality score should rise back above the 4.0 floor over the next 12 months. | →Stable |
| CounterA single-period Piotroski reading of 0 can reflect one weak fiscal year rather than a structural quality problem, and it could normalize quickly. | ||
The stock screens attractively valued on a price-to-earnings basis and ranks favorably against peers on value. Peer-rank breakdown | The stock should continue screening cheap on a peer basis, or the valuation discount should narrow via a higher re-rating, over the next 12 months. | →Stable |
| CounterA statistically cheap valuation can remain cheap indefinitely — or get cheaper — when paired with the deep quality concerns already flagged for this name. | ||
At roughly $0.5 billion in market capitalization, the company sits below the size institutional investors typically require, limiting the pool of buyers. Edge rationale | Market capitalization should grow well above the institutional-reach threshold, or institutional ownership should rise, over the next 12 months. | →Stable |
| CounterSmall-cap constraints on institutional buying can persist for years without resolving, especially absent a growth catalyst or index inclusion. | ||
The stock has posted a golden cross and trades above all major moving averages with rising on-balance volume, forming a breakout setup. Momentum breakdown | Price should hold above the 200-day moving average and on-balance volume should keep rising over the next 12 months for the breakout to confirm. | ↓Deteriorating |
| CounterBreakouts in quality-challenged, small-cap names often fail once the initial buying pressure fades, since there is no fundamental support beneath the move. | ||
The take-profit level of $13.97 sits barely above the current price of $13.96, offering only 0.1% upside against 3.7% downside to the stop-loss. Targets | A revised take-profit level should move well above the current price to restore a favorable risk/reward skew over the next 12 months. | →Stable |
| CounterTight technical ranges can still work in the holder's favor if the underlying dividend income is factored in separately from price-target geometry. | ||
CounterA single-period Piotroski reading of 0 can reflect one weak fiscal year rather than a structural quality problem, and it could normalize quickly.
CounterA statistically cheap valuation can remain cheap indefinitely — or get cheaper — when paired with the deep quality concerns already flagged for this name.
CounterSmall-cap constraints on institutional buying can persist for years without resolving, especially absent a growth catalyst or index inclusion.
CounterBreakouts in quality-challenged, small-cap names often fail once the initial buying pressure fades, since there is no fundamental support beneath the move.
CounterTight technical ranges can still work in the holder's favor if the underlying dividend income is factored in separately from price-target geometry.
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 9.9 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Gross margin | 0.0 |
| Op margin | 0.0 |
| Net margin | 0.0 |
| Moat | 4.5 |
| Piotroski F | 0.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 5.5 |
| MACD | 3.8 |
| OBV | 1.0 |
| MA position | 9.0 |
| Volume | 2.6 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Analyst rating | 5.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| materiality | 5.0 |
| holder change | 2.9 |
| notable moves | 3.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 8.5 |
| quality rank | 5.0 |
| growth rank | 5.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 4.6 |
| support resistance | 4.6 |
| 52w position | 9.5 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 10.0 |
| days to cover | 10.0 |
| volatility | 8.1 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| dividend safety | 6.0 |
Quality below minimum threshold.
L1:HARD_BLOCK:QUALITY_FLOORSetupRange Bound — RSI 45 mid-range, Bollinger mid-band
EdgeInst Constrain — Small cap ($0.5B) below institutional reach
SuitabilityAggressive — MCap $0.5B<$5B
The SELL_IF_HOLDING verdict reflects the MOMENTUM gate's 4.4<4.5 outcome against Value at 9.9 and asymmetric R:R of 0.00.
The strongest dimensions are Value at 9.9, Risk (lower is worse) at 9.4, and Technical at 6.2; the weakest are Quality at 0.9, Insider at 3.6, and Momentum at 4.4. The V9 engine flagged 1 failed gate with 1 warning, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of 0.00 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
Trip ifThe quality score rises above 4.0 from the current 0.9.
Trip ifThe peer value rank falls below 5.0 from the current 8.8.
Trip ifMarket capitalization exceeds $5 billion from the current $0.5 billion.
Trip ifPrice falls more than 5% below the 200-day moving average, reversing the current breakout.
Trip ifThe projected take-profit level rises above $15.00, exceeding the current $13.96 price by more than 7%.