Value
7.9/10data confidence 40%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/S | 9.8 |
| EV/EBITDA | 6.0 |
- ▸Attractively valued
LBTYK · Why this verdict
Why Liberty Global (LBTYK) is rated SELL
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Show full disclosure ▾Hide full disclosure ▴
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
VerdictSELL
Overall score4.8/10
ConfidenceMEDIUM
MacroNEUTRAL
Thesis pillars
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
The business falls below the minimum acceptable quality level, with free cash flow negative at approximately 14% of revenue, no competitive moat, and a combined growth-plus-profitability measure deeply negative at negative 5—indicating the business does not currently self-fund its own growth. Warnings | Free cash flow as a percentage of revenue turns positive and the combined growth-plus-profitability measure turns positive within the next four quarters. | →Stable |
| CounterA Piotroski score of approximately 6.7 out of 9 indicates balance-sheet health is not deteriorating across most dimensions; the quality floor breach may reflect a discrete investment phase rather than permanent impairment. | ||
With only approximately 3.4% of headroom to the near-term resistance ceiling and a risk/reward ratio of roughly 0.55-to-1—with downside measuring approximately 6.2%—the current price geometry offers insufficient compensation for the business and technical risks present. Price targets | Price retraces to a level where upside to the take-profit target exceeds 10% from the prevailing price, restoring an asymmetric setup. | →Stable |
| CounterThe stock sits near its 52-week high, which can act as a self-fulfilling momentum signal; a break above current resistance could render the 3.4% gap a launchpad rather than a ceiling. | ||
Despite the unfavorable price geometry, the stock is trading above its 200-day moving average with rising on-balance volume—a constructive technical setup suggesting underlying demand is accumulating even as the stock approaches resistance. Momentum breakdown | On-balance volume continues to rise and price holds above the 200-day moving average for the next two quarters, providing a technical floor beneath the current price. | →Stable |
| CounterMomentum above the 200-day moving average combined with a price near resistance and minimal upside headroom frequently precedes a period of consolidation or shallow correction before any sustained next leg. | ||
A recent officer departure or appointment flagged in a regulatory filing introduces governance uncertainty—leadership transitions can signal strategic pivots, cost-cutting cycles, or shifts in capital allocation that are difficult to assess before the successor's priorities become clear. Gates warning | Zero additional C-suite departures are announced over the next 2 consecutive quarters, indicating governance has stabilized. | →Stable |
| CounterA single officer change is not inherently negative; a new appointment could bring improved capital-allocation discipline or shareholder-friendly policies that enhance financial quality over time. | ||
The business falls below the minimum acceptable quality level, with free cash flow negative at approximately 14% of revenue, no competitive moat, and a combined growth-plus-profitability measure deeply negative at negative 5—indicating the business does not currently self-fund its own growth.
→StableWarnings
- Expectation
- Free cash flow as a percentage of revenue turns positive and the combined growth-plus-profitability measure turns positive within the next four quarters.
CounterA Piotroski score of approximately 6.7 out of 9 indicates balance-sheet health is not deteriorating across most dimensions; the quality floor breach may reflect a discrete investment phase rather than permanent impairment.
With only approximately 3.4% of headroom to the near-term resistance ceiling and a risk/reward ratio of roughly 0.55-to-1—with downside measuring approximately 6.2%—the current price geometry offers insufficient compensation for the business and technical risks present.
→StablePrice targets
- Expectation
- Price retraces to a level where upside to the take-profit target exceeds 10% from the prevailing price, restoring an asymmetric setup.
CounterThe stock sits near its 52-week high, which can act as a self-fulfilling momentum signal; a break above current resistance could render the 3.4% gap a launchpad rather than a ceiling.
Despite the unfavorable price geometry, the stock is trading above its 200-day moving average with rising on-balance volume—a constructive technical setup suggesting underlying demand is accumulating even as the stock approaches resistance.
→StableMomentum breakdown
- Expectation
- On-balance volume continues to rise and price holds above the 200-day moving average for the next two quarters, providing a technical floor beneath the current price.
CounterMomentum above the 200-day moving average combined with a price near resistance and minimal upside headroom frequently precedes a period of consolidation or shallow correction before any sustained next leg.
A recent officer departure or appointment flagged in a regulatory filing introduces governance uncertainty—leadership transitions can signal strategic pivots, cost-cutting cycles, or shifts in capital allocation that are difficult to assess before the successor's priorities become clear.
→StableGates warning
- Expectation
- Zero additional C-suite departures are announced over the next 2 consecutive quarters, indicating governance has stabilized.
CounterA single officer change is not inherently negative; a new appointment could bring improved capital-allocation discipline or shareholder-friendly policies that enhance financial quality over time.
TrendMatrix Research · core thesis
Engine thesis — one sentence
Liberty Global (this share class) holds a relatively constructive technical footing—above the 200-day moving average with accumulating volume—yet the combination of negative free cash flow equivalent to approximately 14% of revenue, a quality floor breach, and a price geometry leaving only 3.4% of upside against 6.2% of downside makes the current entry unattractive.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
Per-dimension breakdown
Quality
3.4/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 0.0 |
| ROA | 0.1 |
| Gross margin | 9.2 |
| Op margin | 1.8 |
| Current ratio | 4.3 |
| FCF quality | 0.0 |
| Moat | 5.1 |
| Rule of 40 | 3.0 |
| Piotroski F | 6.7 |
- ▸Cash-burning: FCF -14% of revenue
- ▸No competitive moat
- ▸Rule of 40: -5 (fail)
Growth
4.7/10data confidence 33%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 4.7 |
Momentum
2.1/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 3.5 |
| MACD | 3.9 |
| OBV | 1.0 |
| MA position | 1.5 |
| Volume | 0.8 |
- ▸Volume distribution (falling OBV)
- ▸Below 200-MA, MA slope flat
Sentiment
5.0/10data confidence 67%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Analyst rating | 5.0 |
| erm sentiment | 5.0 |
Insider
5.0/10data confidence 50%Peer rank
3.0/10data confidence 80%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 5.4 |
| quality rank | 0.0 |
| growth rank | 6.7 |
Technical
6.9/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 6.5 |
| support resistance | 7.6 |
| 52w position | 6.6 |
Risk (lower is worse)
5.2/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 6.8 |
| days to cover | 4.1 |
| volatility | 4.2 |
| put call | 7.3 |
| implied vol | 0.0 |
| beta | 8.6 |
| debt equity | 5.2 |
- ▸High IV: 125%
- ▸Concentration risks: 1 HIGH, 1 MED (10-K Item 1A — sized via position_sizing, validated via buy_confidence)
Catalyst
5.0/10data confidence 25%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 5.0 |
How the verdict was assembled
Engine trigger
Quality below minimum threshold.
Engine technical detail
verdict_path:
L1:HARD_BLOCKPassed (5)
- INSIDER:OK
- NEWS_EVENTS:NONE_RECENT
- EARNINGS_PROXIMITY:NO_DATE
- SEMI_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
- MATERIALS_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
Failed (1)
- MOMENTUM:2.1<4.5
Warning (2)
- ASYMMETRY:UPSIDE_EXHAUSTED (upside=0.0%)
- 8K_CSUITE_CHANGE:5.02 (officer departure/appointment)
Reward-to-Risk
0.00
Upside
+0.0%
Downside
6.7%
Sizing output
AVOID
Setup— — No clear chart pattern; technical signals are mixed
EdgeNo clear edge — No clear edge identified
SuitabilityAggressive — MCap $3.7B<$5B
Investment implication
The L1 gate blocked the positive-verdict path: a hard-floor threshold was breached, so dimensional pillars — including Value at 7.9 could not lift the engine output above the verdict floor. Failed gate signal: MOMENTUM:2.1<4.5.
The strongest dimensions are Value at 7.9, Technical at 6.9, and Risk (lower is worse) at 5.2; the weakest are Momentum at 2.1, Peer rank at 3.0, and Quality at 3.4. The V9 engine flagged 1 failed gate with 2 warnings, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of 0.00 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
What would invalidate the thesis
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
- P1Quality Below Floor Structural Cash Burn
Trip ifFree cash flow as a percentage of revenue turns positive (above 0%) for 2 consecutive quarters.
- P2Upside Exhausted Near Resistance
Trip ifUpside to the take-profit target rises above 10% from the prevailing price.
- P3Positive Momentum Above 200ma
Trip ifPrice closes below the 200-day moving average for 4 consecutive weeks.
- P4Officer Departure Governance Uncertainty
Trip ifFewer than 1 additional C-suite departures are disclosed in regulatory filings over 2 consecutive quarters, confirming leadership has stabilized.