United States
“10-K Item 1: 'approximately 53% of our products sold were shipped to locations in the United States'”
Updated
The most significant concentration Integer Holdings discloses is United States at 53%, classified HIGH by disclosed size. Below: the full set from the latest 10-K — verbatim quotes, filing references, and a synthesis of what these exposures mean together.
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
Source: Integer Holdings’s SEC Form 10-K filed — view the filing on SEC EDGAR ↗
Each card carries a disclosed-size chip (HIGH / MEDIUM / LOW — how large the exposure is as a share of revenue, not how dangerous it is) and a nature tag: Built-in(the company’s own model, geography, or products) or Outside party (an external customer, supplier, or distributor it relies on).
“10-K Item 1: 'approximately 53% of our products sold were shipped to locations in the United States'”
“10-K Item 1A: 'we obtain some raw materials from a single supplier'”
“10-K Item 1: 'three of our customers, Abbott Laboratories, Boston Scientific and Medtronic were each in excess of 10% of total sales and collectively accounted for 49% of our total sales.'”
The company's concentration profile spans three disclosures: a high-share geographic revenue tilt, a high-share single-source supplier dependency, and a moderate customer concentration. Approximately 53% of products sold were shipped to locations in the United States, a high-share structural concentration that reflects the company's primary market for medical device component manufacturing. The geographic weight is structural — tied to where the company's largest customers are based and where implantable device manufacturing is most concentrated. On the supply side, the company obtains some raw materials from a single supplier, a high-share dependency. Single-source raw material arrangements carry inherent vulnerability: a disruption at that supplier — from financial stress, capacity constraints, or quality issues — could halt production without a ready alternative. Given the precision manufacturing requirements in the medical device supply chain, qualifying a new supplier can be a lengthy, regulatory-intensive process, which amplifies the dependency risk. The customer base has a moderate concentration: Abbott Laboratories, Boston Scientific, and Medtronic each exceeded 10% of total sales individually and collectively accounted for 49% of total sales. This is a dependency exposure, as a meaningful portion of revenue is tied to the order patterns and capital spending decisions of three large medical device OEMs. A shift in procurement strategy or a major program cancellation at any of those customers would be visible in results. Together, the three disclosures present a profile typical of a tier-one medical device contract manufacturer: geographically centered on the U.S., raw-material dependent on select sole-source vendors, and customer-exposed to a concentrated group of large OEMs.
For the engine’s reasoning on ITGR’s current verdict — including which dimensions drove the score — see the per-dimension breakdown.
| Symbol | Name | HIGH | MEDIUM | LOW | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AORT | Artivion, Inc. | 4 | 4 | 0 | 8 |
| ITGR● | Integer Holdings Corporation | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| ATEC | Alphatec Holdings, Inc. | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| ABT | Abbott Laboratories | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| AXGN | AxoGen, Inc. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| BIO | Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Concentration counts reflect items disclosed in each peer’s most recent 10-K; disclosed-size classification uses TrendMatrix’s internal 10-K extraction taxonomy.