cannabis cultivation and production facilities
“10-K Item 1A: 'our real estate investments consist of primarily industrial and greenhouse properties suitable for cultivation and production of cannabis'”
Updated
The most significant concentration Innovative Industrial Propertie discloses is cannabis cultivation and production facilities, classified HIGH by disclosed size. Below: the full set from the latest 10-K — verbatim quotes, filing references, and a synthesis of what these exposures mean together.
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
Source: Innovative Industrial Propertie’s SEC Form 10-K filed — view the filing on SEC EDGAR ↗
Each card carries a disclosed-size chip (HIGH / MEDIUM / LOW — how large the exposure is as a share of revenue, not how dangerous it is) and a nature tag: Built-in(the company’s own model, geography, or products) or Outside party (an external customer, supplier, or distributor it relies on).
“10-K Item 1A: 'our real estate investments consist of primarily industrial and greenhouse properties suitable for cultivation and production of cannabis'”
“10-K Item 1A: 'Ascend (at four of our properties) ... represented 12%, 9%, 8%, 8% and 8%, respectively, of our rental revenues'”
“10-K Item 1A: 'Green Thumb (at three of our properties) ... represented 12%, 9%, 8%, 8% and 8%, respectively, of our rental revenues'”
“10-K Item 1A: 'Curaleaf (at eight of our properties) ... represented 12%, 9%, 8%, 8% and 8%, respectively, of our rental revenues'”
“10-K Item 1A: 'Trulieve (at six of our properties) ... represented 12%, 9%, 8%, 8% and 8%, respectively, of our rental revenues'”
“10-K Item 1A: 'The Cannabist Company (at 21 of our properties) represented 12%, 9%, 8%, 8% and 8%, respectively, of our rental revenues'”
Innovative Industrial Properties' real estate portfolio is structurally concentrated in a single property type: its investments consist primarily of industrial and greenhouse properties suitable for cultivation and production of cannabis, a high-scale exposure to that single end market. Layered on top of that structural concentration is a tenant base that is fragmented rather than dominated by any one operator — Ascend represents 12% of rental revenues across four properties, Green Thumb 9% across three properties, and Curaleaf, Trulieve, and The Cannabist Company each roughly 8%, spread across eight, six, and 21 properties respectively. The two layers of concentration net out differently. The property-type exposure is the one that would move the verdict most if the broader cannabis real estate market itself weakened, since it applies across the whole portfolio regardless of which tenant occupies a given building. The individual tenant exposures, by contrast, are each disclosed at a low share and spread the counterparty risk across five operators rather than concentrating it in one or two — meaning a single tenant's distress would be a manageable, idiosyncratic event rather than a portfolio-wide shock.
For the engine’s reasoning on IIPR’s current verdict — including which dimensions drove the score — see the per-dimension breakdown.
| Symbol | Name | HIGH | MEDIUM | LOW | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| COLD | Americold Realty Trust, Inc. | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| FR | First Industrial Realty Trust, | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| IIPR● | Innovative Industrial Propertie | 1 | 0 | 5 | 6 |
| EGP | EastGroup Properties, Inc. | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| CUBE | CubeSmart | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| EXR | Extra Space Storage Inc | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Concentration counts reflect items disclosed in each peer’s most recent 10-K; disclosed-size classification uses TrendMatrix’s internal 10-K extraction taxonomy.