Value
8.6/10data confidence 20%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 8.6 |
- ▸Attractively valued
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
Gabelli Utility Trust screens as an attractively valued, moat-protected compounder, but an earnings-quality red flag, a yield-trap warning, exhausted upside near its 52-week high, and elevated leverage/volatility together support the recommendation to maintain rather than add to the position.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
The underlying holdings screen as an attractively valued compounder with a wide economic moat and an elite Rule of 40 score of 61, supporting the case for a quality, moat-protected portfolio. Bull case | The quality score should remain above 6.0 over the next 12 months if the compounder characteristics persist. | →Stable |
| CounterA single elite Rule of 40 reading is a snapshot and can be driven by one strong period rather than durable moat-based advantages across the underlying holdings. | ||
The engine flags an earnings quality red flag, with free cash flow at just 9% of net income, indicating reported earnings may not be well backed by actual cash generation. Quality breakdown | The FCF-to-net-income ratio should rise above 50% over the next 12 months if cash conversion improves. | Tripped→Stable |
| CounterA low FCF/NI ratio in a single period can reflect timing differences in working capital or one-off capital expenditures rather than a persistent earnings-quality problem. | ||
The engine flags a yield trap warning, indicating the security's distribution yield may not be sustainably covered despite the underlying portfolio's quality characteristics. Catalyst breakdown | The dividend safety component should rise above 6.0 over the next 12 months if distribution coverage improves. | →Stable |
| CounterClosed-end fund distributions are often structured to include return of capital by design, so a yield-trap flag may be a mechanical scoring artifact rather than a sign of an imminent cut. | ||
The engine flags exhausted upside asymmetry with modeled upside at 0.0%, consistent with the stock trading just 1.5% below its 52-week high and leaving little further modeled reward. Gates warning | The asymmetry ratio should turn positive above 1.0 over the next 12 months if the price consolidates or pulls back from its highs. | Tripped→Stable |
| CounterA stock near its 52-week high in a genuine uptrend can continue making new highs rather than reverting, so proximity to the high alone doesn't guarantee exhausted upside. | ||
Risk metrics are elevated, with the debt-to-equity component maxed at 10.0 and volatility at 8.9, reflecting a highly leveraged, risk-heavy profile in the engine's model. Components | The composite risk score should fall below 6.5 over the next 12 months if leverage or volatility eases. | ↓Deteriorating |
| CounterLeverage-driven risk scoring is a structural feature of many closed-end funds by design, so a high debt-to-equity reading may reflect the fund's normal operating model rather than a rising risk of loss. | ||
CounterA single elite Rule of 40 reading is a snapshot and can be driven by one strong period rather than durable moat-based advantages across the underlying holdings.
CounterA low FCF/NI ratio in a single period can reflect timing differences in working capital or one-off capital expenditures rather than a persistent earnings-quality problem.
CounterClosed-end fund distributions are often structured to include return of capital by design, so a yield-trap flag may be a mechanical scoring artifact rather than a sign of an imminent cut.
CounterA stock near its 52-week high in a genuine uptrend can continue making new highs rather than reverting, so proximity to the high alone doesn't guarantee exhausted upside.
CounterLeverage-driven risk scoring is a structural feature of many closed-end funds by design, so a high debt-to-equity reading may reflect the fund's normal operating model rather than a rising risk of loss.
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 8.6 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 5.0 |
| ROA | 0.9 |
| Gross margin | 10.0 |
| Op margin | 10.0 |
| Current ratio | 4.2 |
| FCF quality | 0.7 |
| Moat | 8.4 |
| Rule of 40 | 9.5 |
| Piotroski F | 6.7 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 8.0 |
| EPS growth | 0.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 5.5 |
| MACD | 3.2 |
| OBV | 1.0 |
| MA position | 6.0 |
| Volume | 4.2 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Analyst rating | 5.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 2.8 |
| quality rank | 8.6 |
| growth rank | 8.7 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 7.1 |
| support resistance | 7.2 |
| 52w position | 8.4 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 9.2 |
| days to cover | 5.0 |
| volatility | 6.4 |
| beta | 9.9 |
| debt equity | 10.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| dividend safety | 2.2 |
Maintain position. Not compelling to add more.
L4:PATH_F_HOLDSetup— — No clear chart pattern; technical signals are mixed
EdgeInst Constrain — Small cap ($0.6B) below institutional reach
SuitabilityAggressive — MCap $0.6B<$5B
None of the engine's positive-conviction paths (C-quality, D-momentum) triggered — the F-path HOLD reflects balanced signals. Strongest-cleared gate: INSIDER:OK. Top dim: Value at 8.6; weakest: Catalyst at 2.2. No conviction either direction.
The strongest dimensions are Value at 8.6, Risk (lower is worse) at 8.1, and Technical at 7.6; the weakest are Catalyst at 2.2, Momentum at 4.0, and Growth at 4.0. The V9 engine flagged 1 failed gate with 1 warning, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of 0.00 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
Trip ifQuality score falls below 4.0, from the current 6.2, for 2 consecutive quarters.
Trip ifFCF-to-net-income ratio rises above 50%, from the current 9%, over the next 2 quarters.
Trip ifDividend safety component rises above 6.0, from the current 3.5, over the next 2 quarters.
Trip ifAsymmetry ratio rises above 1.0, from the current 0.0, as the price pulls back or a new catalyst emerges.
Trip ifRisk score falls below 6.5, from the current 8.7, over the next 2 quarters.