Value
7.5/10data confidence 83%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 8.6 |
| P/S | 7.8 |
| Fwd P/E | 9.3 |
| PEG | 8.8 |
| Analyst target | 3.0 |
- ▸Forward P/E: 9.9x
- ▸PEG: 0.70
- ▸Attractively valued
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
Net margins of 27% are strong for the regional banking segment, and a Piotroski financial health score of 8 out of 9 confirms disciplined operations across balance-sheet and profitability metrics — a quality foundation that provides a cushion against credit-cycle headwinds even without an identified competitive moat. Quality breakdown | Net margins remain at or above 25% for 4 consecutive reported quarters, confirming the profitability profile is structural rather than cyclical. | →Stable |
| CounterThe absence of a competitive moat in regional banking means the 27% margin could compress if deposit funding costs rise or if loan-quality deterioration forces higher provisioning — risks that the current headline metrics do not capture. | ||
The stock trades at a forward price-to-earnings multiple of 9.4x with a price-to-earnings-growth ratio of 0.66 — metrics characterized as attractively valued — offering a margin of comfort relative to peers even after the recent price appreciation. Bull case | Earnings per share continue to grow such that the forward price-to-earnings multiple remains at or below 12x over the next four quarters, confirming the valuation case has not been arbitraged away. | →Stable |
| CounterAttractive valuation in regional banking can persist without a catalyst to close the gap; with the stock already near the analyst target, the valuation argument alone may not be sufficient to drive a near-term re-rating, and the multiple could drift higher as the stock approaches fair value. | ||
The stock has risen to within approximately 5% of the analyst consensus price target — identified explicitly as a limiting factor — leaving the expected return too thin relative to downside risk at current levels and explaining why the entry geometry is unfavorable for new capital. Bear case | Analyst consensus price target rises above $56, restoring implied upside greater than 20% from the current price of $45.87, or the stock corrects to create a wider margin of safety. | →Stable |
| CounterA stock approaching its analyst target in a bullish momentum setup may reflect the market re-rating the franchise to a higher earnings multiple rather than simply hitting a ceiling; analyst targets tend to be revised upward in response to continued earnings beats, which the record suggests is plausible. | ||
The risk-to-reward ratio at the current price is below 1-to-1 — with downside risk outpacing the remaining upside to the analyst target — a geometric constraint that means even a fundamentally sound bank does not offer a compelling new-money entry point at these levels. Engine gate (failed) | The reward-to-risk ratio improves above 1.5-to-1 through a meaningful analyst target upgrade or a price correction that widens the margin of safety. | →Stable |
| CounterA near-1-to-1 risk/reward in a high-quality bank with zero misses in the last four earnings reports and strong momentum may still generate positive expected returns if the probability of reaching the target is substantially greater than 50% — which the consistent earnings delivery record suggests is plausible. | ||
CounterThe absence of a competitive moat in regional banking means the 27% margin could compress if deposit funding costs rise or if loan-quality deterioration forces higher provisioning — risks that the current headline metrics do not capture.
CounterAttractive valuation in regional banking can persist without a catalyst to close the gap; with the stock already near the analyst target, the valuation argument alone may not be sufficient to drive a near-term re-rating, and the multiple could drift higher as the stock approaches fair value.
CounterA stock approaching its analyst target in a bullish momentum setup may reflect the market re-rating the franchise to a higher earnings multiple rather than simply hitting a ceiling; analyst targets tend to be revised upward in response to continued earnings beats, which the record suggests is plausible.
CounterA near-1-to-1 risk/reward in a high-quality bank with zero misses in the last four earnings reports and strong momentum may still generate positive expected returns if the probability of reaching the target is substantially greater than 50% — which the consistent earnings delivery record suggests is plausible.
The bank screens well on value and quality — a forward price-to-earnings multiple of 9.4x, 27% net margins, and an 8-out-of-9 Piotroski financial health score — with technically bullish price momentum, but having risen to within approximately 5% of the analyst consensus price target, the remaining upside does not clear the risk-to-reward threshold required to add new capital; the appropriate posture is to hold and wait for a target revision or a price correction.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 8.6 |
| P/S | 7.8 |
| Fwd P/E | 9.3 |
| PEG | 8.8 |
| Analyst target | 3.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 3.3 |
| ROA | 0.8 |
| Gross margin | 0.0 |
| Op margin | 10.0 |
| Net margin | 10.0 |
| Moat | 5.4 |
| Piotroski F | 8.9 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 6.1 |
| EPS growth | 4.8 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 5.0 |
| MACD | 9.8 |
| OBV | 10.0 |
| MA position | 9.0 |
| Volume | 0.8 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Analyst rating | 6.7 |
| Price target | 5.3 |
| erm sentiment | 5.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| materiality | 5.0 |
| holder change | 5.1 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 6.3 |
| quality rank | 3.4 |
| growth rank | 5.4 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 1.5 |
| support resistance | 1.9 |
| 52w position | 9.5 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 9.3 |
| days to cover | 7.9 |
| volatility | 5.8 |
| put call | 10.0 |
| implied vol | 0.0 |
| beta | 8.3 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 5.0 |
| earnings history | 10.0 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 4.5 |
| dividend safety | 5.2 |
Maintain position. Not compelling to add more.
L4:PATH_F_HOLDSetupBreakout — Golden cross, above all MAs, RSI 65, MACD bullish
EdgeInst Constrain — Small cap ($1.3B) below institutional reach
SuitabilityAggressive — MCap $1.3B<$5B
None of the engine's positive-conviction paths (C-quality, D-momentum) triggered — the F-path HOLD reflects balanced signals. Strongest-cleared gate: MOMENTUM:6.9>=5.5. Top dim: Value at 7.5; weakest: Technical at 4.3. No conviction either direction.
The strongest dimensions are Value at 7.5, Momentum at 6.9, and Risk (lower is worse) at 6.9; the weakest are Technical at 4.3, Peer rank at 5.0, and Insider at 5.0. The V9 engine flagged 1 failed gate with 1 warning, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of -1.14 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
Trip ifForward price-to-earnings multiple expands above 16x without a corresponding increase in earnings per share, indicating the valuation case has been eroded.
Trip ifAnalyst consensus price target rises above $56, restoring implied upside greater than 20% from the current price of $45.87.
Trip ifNet margins fall below 20% for 2 consecutive reported quarters.
Trip ifImplied upside to the analyst consensus price target expands above 20% from the current price of $45.87 for 4 consecutive weeks.