Value
3.0/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 2.5 |
| P/S | 6.9 |
| EV/EBITDA | 0.0 |
| Fwd P/E | 2.5 |
| PEG | 2.4 |
| Analyst target | 4.0 |
- ▸Forward P/E: 45.9x
- ▸PEG: 5.24
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
A forward price-to-earnings multiple above 45x and a growth-adjusted valuation ratio above 5.0 reflect expectations that are materially ahead of actual growth delivery; a premium this elevated can persist only if earnings growth accelerates substantially, and with estimates currently being revised downward that acceleration is not yet in evidence. Valuation breakdown | The forward multiple compresses below 30x as earnings revisions turn positive and growth delivery improves, confirming that fundamentals are catching up to the price. | →Stable |
| CounterInfrastructure and concession businesses often trade at elevated multiples because long-duration contracted revenues justify a lower discount rate; if toll and concession revenues begin to accelerate, the current multiple could prove reasonable in hindsight. | ||
Free cash flow represents only about a third of reported net income, a level that analysis flags as a red alert for earnings quality; the majority of accounting profits are not being converted into actual cash, which limits the business's ability to self-fund growth or return capital. Quality breakdown | Free cash flow rises above 60% of net income for 2 consecutive annual reporting periods, demonstrating that cash conversion has improved to a level consistent with high earnings quality. | →Stable |
| CounterCapital-intensive infrastructure businesses routinely report low free-cash-flow-to-net-income ratios during active project construction phases; if the investment cycle matures and project completions accelerate, conversion ratios could improve significantly without any change in the underlying business economics. | ||
Sell-side earnings estimates have been revised downward, a signal that consensus expectations are falling faster than the current share price is adjusting; deteriorating estimate momentum is a meaningful headwind for multiple expansion at an already-elevated valuation. Bear case | Net earnings estimate revisions turn positive — with more upgrades than downgrades — for 2 consecutive months, signaling that the estimate trough has passed and growth expectations are stabilizing. | →Stable |
| CounterDownward revisions sometimes reflect one-time accounting items or conservative revenue recognition rather than genuine business deterioration; if underlying concession revenues remain resilient, estimates could stabilize or reverse higher without any change in operational fundamentals. | ||
A put-to-call ratio of 1.64 indicates the options market is carrying meaningfully more downside protection than upside exposure; the stock is also trading above its technical take-profit target with an unfavorable reward-to-risk ratio, compounding the cautious positioning signal with an unattractive price structure. Risk breakdown | The put-to-call ratio falls below 1.0 and remains there for 4 consecutive weeks, indicating options positioning has normalized to a neutral stance and the market caution signal has dissipated. | →Stable |
| CounterIn lower-volume names, an elevated put-to-call ratio can reflect a single large institutional hedging transaction rather than broad consensus bearishness; if the underlying business delivers a positive development, the protective positioning could unwind rapidly. | ||
CounterInfrastructure and concession businesses often trade at elevated multiples because long-duration contracted revenues justify a lower discount rate; if toll and concession revenues begin to accelerate, the current multiple could prove reasonable in hindsight.
CounterCapital-intensive infrastructure businesses routinely report low free-cash-flow-to-net-income ratios during active project construction phases; if the investment cycle matures and project completions accelerate, conversion ratios could improve significantly without any change in the underlying business economics.
CounterDownward revisions sometimes reflect one-time accounting items or conservative revenue recognition rather than genuine business deterioration; if underlying concession revenues remain resilient, estimates could stabilize or reverse higher without any change in operational fundamentals.
CounterIn lower-volume names, an elevated put-to-call ratio can reflect a single large institutional hedging transaction rather than broad consensus bearishness; if the underlying business delivers a positive development, the protective positioning could unwind rapidly.
Ferrovial trades at a forward price-to-earnings multiple above 45x and a growth-adjusted valuation ratio above 5.0, while earnings estimates have been revised lower and free cash flow represents only about a third of net income; the stock is already trading above its technical take-profit target with an unfavorable reward-to-risk ratio, and the options market is carrying an elevated put-to-call ratio of 1.64, signaling institutional caution about near-term downside.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 2.5 |
| P/S | 6.9 |
| EV/EBITDA | 0.0 |
| Fwd P/E | 2.5 |
| PEG | 2.4 |
| Analyst target | 4.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 4.8 |
| ROA | 1.6 |
| Gross margin | 10.0 |
| Op margin | 4.9 |
| Net margin | 4.6 |
| Current ratio | 4.4 |
| FCF quality | 2.9 |
| Moat | 6.2 |
| Rule of 40 | 3.0 |
| Piotroski F | 6.7 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 3.9 |
| EPS growth | 0.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 5.5 |
| MACD | 1.4 |
| OBV | 10.0 |
| MA position | 9.0 |
| Volume | 3.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Analyst rating | 5.0 |
| Price target | 6.8 |
| erm sentiment | 4.2 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 2.1 |
| quality rank | 5.6 |
| growth rank | 2.5 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 4.9 |
| support resistance | 4.0 |
| 52w position | 8.4 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 9.6 |
| days to cover | 8.6 |
| volatility | 7.5 |
| put call | 8.7 |
| implied vol | 5.2 |
| beta | 8.2 |
| debt equity | 4.2 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 3.5 |
| dividend safety | 6.0 |
Multiple concerning factors. Consider reducing position.
L4:PATH_F_SELLnone
SetupRange Bound — RSI 51 mid-range, Bollinger mid-band
EdgeNo clear edge — No clear edge identified
SuitabilityModerate — Balanced profile
The F-path SELL output reflects an overall score of 3.8 below the 5.6 soft trigger — multiple weakening dimensions accumulated rather than a single hard-floor breach. The strongest dimension ( Risk (lower is worse) at 7.4) was not enough to lift the adjusted overall above the threshold. Co-occurring failed gates ( ASYMMETRY:-0.7=NEGATIVE) reinforce the read. Current asymmetry R:R is -0.71 — supplementary context, not the trigger for this path.
The strongest dimensions are Risk (lower is worse) at 7.4, Momentum at 5.8, and Technical at 5.8; the weakest are Growth at 1.9, Peer rank at 2.6, and Value at 3.0. The V9 engine flagged 1 failed gate, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of -0.71 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
Trip ifForward price-to-earnings multiple compresses below 30x as earnings revisions turn positive for 2 consecutive months, indicating the valuation premium is unwinding.
Trip ifFree cash flow rises above 60% of net income for 2 consecutive annual reporting periods, demonstrating a structural improvement in cash conversion.
Trip ifNet earnings estimate upgrades exceed downgrades for 2 consecutive months, signaling that the estimate trough has passed.
Trip ifPut-to-call ratio falls below 1.0 and remains there for 4 consecutive weeks, indicating options market caution has fully normalized.