Kansas
“10-K Item 1: 'Evergy expects its 2026 Kansas and Missouri jurisdictional retail revenues to be approximately 60% and 40%, respectively'”
Updated
The most significant concentration Evergy discloses is Kansas at 60%, classified HIGH by disclosed size. Below: the full set from the latest 10-K — verbatim quotes, filing references, and a synthesis of what these exposures mean together.
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
Source: Evergy’s SEC Form 10-K filed — view the filing on SEC EDGAR ↗
Each card carries a disclosed-size chip (HIGH / MEDIUM / LOW — how large the exposure is as a share of revenue, not how dangerous it is) and a nature tag: Built-in(the company’s own model, geography, or products) or Outside party (an external customer, supplier, or distributor it relies on).
“10-K Item 1: 'Evergy expects its 2026 Kansas and Missouri jurisdictional retail revenues to be approximately 60% and 40%, respectively'”
“10-K Item 1: 'Evergy Kansas Central and Evergy Metro's Kansas operations are regulated by the State Corporation Commission of the State of Kansas (KCC) ... approximately 60%'”
“10-K Item 1: 'actual 2025 fuel mix ... Coal| 47| %'”
“10-K Item 1: 'Evergy Metro's Missouri operations and Evergy Missouri West are regulated by the Public Service Commission of the State of Missouri (MPSC) ... 40%, respectively'”
The company's disclosed concentration profile is predominantly structural, reflecting the two-state regulatory geography in which it operates as a regulated electric utility. Kansas jurisdictional retail revenues are expected to represent approximately 60% of consolidated retail revenues, a high share by disclosed size, and the Kansas operations are correspondingly subject to the State Corporation Commission of the State of Kansas — the same approximately 60% share flows through a single state regulator. Missouri operations are expected to represent approximately 40% of retail revenues, regulated by the Public Service Commission of the State of Missouri. Both exposures are structural: they reflect where the franchise operates, not reliance on individual customers or contracts that could be withdrawn. The regulatory bifurcation means rate outcomes, capital recovery timelines, and return-on-equity authorizations in Kansas and Missouri are the primary drivers of financial performance, and divergence between the two commissions' postures is the main idiosyncratic risk in this profile. A third exposure is the fuel mix: coal accounted for a meaningful share of the 2025 generation mix, a medium-share structural concentration that ties operating costs to coal markets and exposes the company to potential regulatory pressure as state and federal clean-energy standards evolve. On balance, no single-name customer or counterparty dependency is disclosed — the risk profile is geographic and regulatory in character throughout.
For the engine’s reasoning on EVRG’s current verdict — including which dimensions drove the score — see the per-dimension breakdown.
| Symbol | Name | HIGH | MEDIUM | LOW | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CNP | CenterPoint Energy, Inc (Holdin | 2 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| EVRG● | Evergy, Inc. | 2 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| D | Dominion Energy, Inc. | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| AEE | Ameren Corporation | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| AEP | American Electric Power Company | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| CMS | CMS Energy Corporation | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Concentration counts reflect items disclosed in each peer’s most recent 10-K; disclosed-size classification uses TrendMatrix’s internal 10-K extraction taxonomy.