Value
9.2/10data confidence 33%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/S | 9.4 |
| Analyst target | 9.0 |
- ▸Attractively valued
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
Quality has breached the engine's minimum floor at 1.7 out of 10 against the 4.0 threshold, with zero ROE, ROA, gross margin, operating margin, and net margin, triggering an exit recommendation. Warnings | Quality score should remain below the 4.0 floor as long as core profitability metrics stay at zero. | →Stable |
| CounterEvotec is a contract drug-discovery and development partner whose revenue mix has been disrupted by partner-funded R&D pullbacks industry-wide, so near-term margin weakness may reflect a cyclical funding downturn rather than a structural loss of competitiveness. | ||
Evotec models a strongly favorable risk/reward asymmetry of 4.25, with 49.8% modeled upside to target against 11.7% downside to stop. Reward-to-risk math | The asymmetry ratio should remain above 1.5 as long as the gap between the analyst-target-derived take-profit and current price stays wide. | →Stable |
| CounterA stock trading below its 200-day moving average in a confirmed downtrend, with declining revenue of -22%, may have a modeled upside built on an analyst target that hasn't yet caught up to deteriorating fundamentals. | ||
Revenue is declining sharply, down 22% year-over-year per the engine's growth notes, driving a growth score of 0.0 out of 10, the weakest possible reading. Growth breakdown | Revenue growth should stabilize toward flat or positive as the decline moderates. | →Stable |
| CounterGrowth-dimension confidence is only 0.33, and a single-year revenue decline in contract research organizations often reflects lumpy milestone payments rather than a structural loss of business. | ||
Momentum shows a confirmed downtrend, with price below the 200-day moving average and a 30-day moving-average slope of -3.6%, though on-balance volume is rising and the setup is classified as recovering. Momentum breakdown | Momentum score should climb further above the 5.5 gate as the recovery matures, alongside a return above the 200-day moving average. | →Stable |
| CounterThe death-cross gate warning notes only that momentum is recovering, not yet resolved, so the confirmed downtrend could reassert itself before a genuine reversal takes hold. | ||
The engine identifies an institutional-constraint edge: at a $1.0B market cap, the stock sits below the reach of most institutional investors. Edge rationale | Market capitalization should remain below the $5B institutional-reach threshold, preserving the edge classification. | →Stable |
| CounterThis edge classification does not offset the avoid-sizing recommendation driven by the quality-floor breach, so the institutional-constraint framing alone provides limited support for a position. | ||
CounterEvotec is a contract drug-discovery and development partner whose revenue mix has been disrupted by partner-funded R&D pullbacks industry-wide, so near-term margin weakness may reflect a cyclical funding downturn rather than a structural loss of competitiveness.
CounterA stock trading below its 200-day moving average in a confirmed downtrend, with declining revenue of -22%, may have a modeled upside built on an analyst target that hasn't yet caught up to deteriorating fundamentals.
CounterGrowth-dimension confidence is only 0.33, and a single-year revenue decline in contract research organizations often reflects lumpy milestone payments rather than a structural loss of business.
CounterThe death-cross gate warning notes only that momentum is recovering, not yet resolved, so the confirmed downtrend could reassert itself before a genuine reversal takes hold.
CounterThis edge classification does not offset the avoid-sizing recommendation driven by the quality-floor breach, so the institutional-constraint framing alone provides limited support for a position.
Evotec models a strongly favorable risk/reward asymmetry and an early technical recovery, but a quality-floor breach, sharply declining revenue, and a still-confirmed downtrend keep the setup on exit watch.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/S | 9.4 |
| Analyst target | 9.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 0.0 |
| ROA | 0.0 |
| Gross margin | 0.0 |
| Op margin | 0.0 |
| Net margin | 0.0 |
| Current ratio | 6.0 |
| Moat | 3.2 |
| Piotroski F | 4.4 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 0.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 4.5 |
| MACD | 7.1 |
| OBV | 10.0 |
| MA position | 4.0 |
| Volume | 0.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Analyst rating | 5.0 |
| Price target | 9.9 |
| erm sentiment | 5.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 7.4 |
| quality rank | 1.2 |
| growth rank | 0.2 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 2.5 |
| support resistance | 2.4 |
| 52w position | 2.8 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 10.0 |
| days to cover | 8.9 |
| volatility | 4.6 |
| beta | 5.7 |
| debt equity | 7.7 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 5.0 |
| earnings history | 3.3 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 0.0 |
Quality below minimum threshold.
L1:HARD_BLOCKnone
SetupRecovery — Death cross but MACD improving, RSI 53
EdgeInst Constrain — Small cap ($1.0B) below institutional reach
SuitabilityAggressive — Beta 1.31>1.3, MCap $1.0B<$5B
The L1 gate blocked the positive-verdict path: a hard-floor threshold was breached, so dimensional pillars — including Value at 9.2 could not lift the engine output above the verdict floor.
The strongest dimensions are Value at 9.2, Risk (lower is worse) at 7.4, and Sentiment at 6.6; the weakest are Growth at 0.0, Quality at 1.7, and Peer rank at 2.2. The V9 engine cleared all gates with 2 warnings, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of 5.38 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
Trip ifAsymmetry ratio falls below 1.5 from the current 4.25.
Trip ifQuality score rises above 4.0 from the current 1.7, clearing the floor.
Trip ifRevenue growth falls below -35% YoY from the current -22%.
Trip ifMomentum score falls below 4.5 from the current 5.5, reversing the recovery.
Trip ifMarket capitalization rises above $5B from the current $1.0B, eliminating the institutional-constraint edge.