Value
9.8/10data confidence 33%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 9.5 |
| PEG | 10.0 |
- ▸PEG: 0.15
- ▸Attractively valued
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Buy-Write screens cheap on a PEG basis and is in a confirmed technical breakout, but sits at exhausted upside near its 52-week high with a dividend-safety flag that echoes its below-average quality score.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
ETB screens as attractively valued with a PEG ratio of just 0.16, driving a value score of 9.8 out of 10, the strongest dimension in the model. Valuation breakdown | PEG ratio should remain below 0.5 and the value score above 8.0 as long as the valuation gap persists. | →Stable |
| CounterA PEG this low for a closed-end covered-call fund may reflect a quirk in how earnings growth is measured for an income-focused vehicle rather than genuine mispricing, and the fund's own growth notes flag declining revenue of -10%. | ||
ETB is in a confirmed technical breakout, with a golden cross, price above all major moving averages, RSI at 67, and bullish MACD, sitting just 1.0% below its 52-week high. Chart pattern detection | The stock should hold above its moving averages and eventually push through to a new 52-week high. | →Stable |
| CounterBeing this close to a 52-week high with the asymmetry gate already flagging upside as exhausted means limited room to run before the setup requires a fresh catalyst. | ||
The engine's asymmetry gate is flagged as upside-exhausted, with 0.0% modeled upside to target against 5.0% downside to stop. Gates warning | The asymmetry ratio should stay pinned near zero or negative as long as the stock trades at or above its target price. | →Stable |
| CounterThe current target may not yet reflect potential dividend increases or NAV appreciation in the fund's underlying holdings, which could restore modeled upside. | ||
The catalyst dimension flags a yield-trap warning: the fund's distribution yield is high but the underlying safety score is only 4.2 out of 10, consistent with the key risk of below-average business quality. Catalyst breakdown | Dividend safety score should climb above 5.0 if the payout-coverage concern resolves over the next several quarters. | →Stable |
| CounterCovered-call funds like ETB often sustain high distributions through option premium income even when NAV total-return coverage looks weak on a simple safety score, which may overstate cut risk. | ||
CounterA PEG this low for a closed-end covered-call fund may reflect a quirk in how earnings growth is measured for an income-focused vehicle rather than genuine mispricing, and the fund's own growth notes flag declining revenue of -10%.
CounterBeing this close to a 52-week high with the asymmetry gate already flagging upside as exhausted means limited room to run before the setup requires a fresh catalyst.
CounterThe current target may not yet reflect potential dividend increases or NAV appreciation in the fund's underlying holdings, which could restore modeled upside.
CounterCovered-call funds like ETB often sustain high distributions through option premium income even when NAV total-return coverage looks weak on a simple safety score, which may overstate cut risk.
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 9.5 |
| PEG | 10.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 4.3 |
| ROA | 0.1 |
| Gross margin | 10.0 |
| Op margin | 4.2 |
| Current ratio | 1.1 |
| Moat | 5.6 |
| Piotroski F | 5.6 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 0.0 |
| EPS growth | 10.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 5.0 |
| MACD | 6.5 |
| OBV | 10.0 |
| MA position | 9.0 |
| Volume | 5.7 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Analyst rating | 5.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 3.7 |
| quality rank | 8.1 |
| growth rank | 1.6 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 3.6 |
| support resistance | 2.1 |
| 52w position | 9.8 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| days to cover | 10.0 |
| volatility | 10.0 |
| beta | 7.5 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| dividend safety | 3.5 |
Mixed signals. Hold existing position.
L4:PATH_F_HOLD_DEFAULTnone
SetupBreakout — Golden cross, above all MAs, RSI 65, MACD bullish
EdgeInst Constrain — Small cap ($0.5B) below institutional reach
SuitabilityAggressive — MCap $0.5B<$5B
The default F-path HOLD fired without any positive-conviction gate triggering — no momentum acceleration, no quality+value crossover, no setup recognition. Highest-clear gate: MOMENTUM:7.2>=5.5. Top dim: Value at 9.8; weakest: Catalyst at 3.5. The engine's read is one of pattern absence — no directional conviction in either direction at current asymmetry.
The strongest dimensions are Value at 9.8, Risk (lower is worse) at 9.2, and Momentum at 7.2; the weakest are Catalyst at 3.5, Quality at 4.4, and Peer rank at 4.6. The V9 engine cleared all gates with 1 warning, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of 0.00 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
Trip ifPEG ratio rises above 1.0 from the current 0.16.
Trip ifRSI falls below 50 from the current 67, signaling the breakout has lost momentum.
Trip ifAsymmetry ratio rises above 1.0 from the current 0.0, with modeled upside meaningfully exceeding downside.
Trip ifDividend safety score falls below 3.0 from the current 4.2.