top five Applebee's franchisees
“10-K Item 1: 'Our five largest Applebee's franchisees owned 57% of the total 1,520 Applebee's franchised restaurants.'”
Updated
The most significant concentration Dine Brands Global, Inc. Common discloses is top five Applebee's franchisees at 57%, classified HIGH by disclosed size. Below: the full set from the latest 10-K — verbatim quotes, filing references, and a synthesis of what these exposures mean together.
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
Source: Dine Brands Global, Inc. Common’s SEC Form 10-K filed — view the filing on SEC EDGAR ↗
Each card carries a disclosed-size chip (HIGH / MEDIUM / LOW — how large the exposure is as a share of revenue, not how dangerous it is) and a nature tag: Built-in(the company’s own model, geography, or products) or Outside party (an external customer, supplier, or distributor it relies on).
“10-K Item 1: 'Our five largest Applebee's franchisees owned 57% of the total 1,520 Applebee's franchised restaurants.'”
“10-K Item 1: 'CSCS has been appointed as the sole authorized purchasing organization and purchasing agent for goods, equipment and distribution services for IHOP and Applebee's restaurants in the United States.'”
“10-K Item 1: 'Our five largest Fuzzy's franchisees owned 41% of the total 105 Fuzzy's franchise restaurants.'”
“10-K Item 1: 'Our five largest IHOP franchisees owned 32% of the total 1,812 IHOP franchised restaurants.'”
Dine Brands' concentration risk is entirely dependency-based, running through franchisees and a single supply-chain intermediary rather than structural business-mix factors. The five largest Applebee's franchisees owned 57% of the total 1,520 Applebee's franchised restaurants, a high-share exposure, meaning a majority of one brand's system sits with a handful of operators. On the supply side, CSCS has been appointed the sole authorized purchasing organization and purchasing agent for goods, equipment, and distribution services for IHOP and Applebee's restaurants in the United States, also a high-share dependency that touches both brands at once. Franchisee concentration is somewhat lower, though still notable, at the other two chains: the five largest Fuzzy's franchisees owned 41% and the five largest IHOP franchisees owned 32%, both medium-share exposures. Netting these out, the Applebee's franchisee concentration and the single-sourced CSCS supply arrangement are the two exposures most capable of moving results, since both sit at a high share and CSCS in particular threads through the entire franchise system rather than one brand alone.
For the engine’s reasoning on DIN’s current verdict — including which dimensions drove the score — see the per-dimension breakdown.
| Symbol | Name | HIGH | MEDIUM | LOW | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DIN● | Dine Brands Global, Inc. Common | 2 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| BJRI | BJ's Restaurants, Inc. | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| BLMN | Bloomin' Brands, Inc. | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| BH | Biglari Holdings Inc. | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| BH-A | Biglari Holdings Inc. | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| BROS | Dutch Bros Inc. | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Concentration counts reflect items disclosed in each peer’s most recent 10-K; disclosed-size classification uses TrendMatrix’s internal 10-K extraction taxonomy.