Skip to main content
DGICADonegal Group, Inc.Sell5.2·$18.75
DGICA · Why this verdict

Why Donegal Group (DGICA) is rated SELL

Updated

Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results. How we score · Editorial policy

Show full disclosure ▾

About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.

Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.

Conflicts and positions. People who build TrendMatrix, or entities they control, may hold positions, long or short, in securities it covers, and may trade them at any time. Positions are not disclosed individually. Verdicts are generated by an automated model applied by the same rules to every covered stock, and are not adjusted for any position held by the people who build TrendMatrix. We do not accept payment from issuers for coverage.

No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security.

No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.

Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.

Methodology · Editorial policy & full disclaimer

VerdictSELL
Overall score5.2/10
ConfidenceMEDIUM
MacroNEUTRAL
TrendMatrix Research · core thesis

Engine thesis — one sentence

Donegal Group is a cheaply valued property and casualty insurer with notable insider buying and a 4.1% dividend, but it trades above the analyst target with slipping revenue and weak quality.

Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.

Thesis pillars

Quality is 3.2/10 with free cash flow at 59% of net income and no moat, while revenue fell about 2.4% from $247.1M to $241.1M year over year.

↓Deteriorating
Quality breakdown
Expectation
Cash conversion improves and revenue returns to growth over the next four quarters.

CounterQuarterly revenue has been fairly steady at $236M to $246M, so the decline may be cyclical rather than structural.

At $18.82 the stock is above the $17.85 analyst target (target-implied upside of -5.2%), with 6.1% downside to the stop.

↓Deteriorating
Estimated upside
Expectation
Analysts raise targets above the share price within 12 months.

CounterThe golden cross and momentum of 7.2/10 suggest the market is re-rating ahead of the only 2 analysts covering the stock.

Insiders bought $2,416,951 of stock, equal to 0.347% of market cap, a notable buying signal.

→Stable
Insider breakdown
Expectation
Insiders remain net buyers over the next two quarters.

CounterA single large purchase can reflect one person's view rather than broad insider conviction.

Forward P/E is 10.0x with a PEG of 0.33 and a 4.1% dividend yield, which together signal an attractive valuation.

↑Improving
Valuation breakdown
Expectation
Valuation and the dividend are maintained as earnings stabilize.

CounterA low multiple on declining revenue may be a value trap, and the dividend depends on insurance underwriting results.

EPS beat in 2 and missed in 2 of the last 4 quarters, with a 23.26% beat in July 2026 offset by a -20.0% miss in April 2026.

↑Improving
Last 4 quarters
Expectation
Earnings surprises turn consistently positive across the next four reports.

CounterThe next report is only 5 days away and the average surprise is roughly -0.11%, so results are essentially in line at best.

Per-dimension breakdown

Value

9.0/10data confidence 67%
ComponentSub-score
P/E9.0
P/S9.8
EV/EBITDA7.2
Fwd P/E9.3
  • ▸Forward P/E: 10.0x
  • ▸Attractively valued

Quality

2.8/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
ROE3.6
ROA1.5
Gross margin0.0
Op margin3.8
Net margin3.6
Current ratio2.0
Moat4.6
Piotroski F3.3
  • ▸No competitive moat
  • ▸Weak Piotroski F-Score: 3/9
  • ▸Quality concerns

Growth

0.8/10data confidence 67%
ComponentSub-score
Rev growth1.7
EPS growth0.0
  • ▸Declining revenue: -3%

Momentum

6.1/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
RSI5.0
MACD7.3
OBV6.2
MA position8.0
Volume4.1
  • ▸Above 200-MA but MA slope flat

Sentiment

6.5/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
LLM sentiment7.0
Analyst rating5.9
Price target6.7
  • ▸LLM news sentiment: +0.40 (n=1)
  • ▸Light analyst coverage (2.0) — signal dampened

Insider

7.0/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
materiality8.0
insider conviction6.3
holder change6.9
notable moves7.0
  • ▸Notable insider buying — $2,416,951 (0.348% of mkt cap)

Peer rank

5.2/10data confidence 80%
ComponentSub-score
value rank8.1
quality rank2.4
growth rank1.5
  • ▸Conservative debt levels

Technical

4.6/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
bollinger2.1
support resistance3.1
52w position8.6

Risk (lower is worse)

5.9/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
short interest7.9
days to cover4.3
volatility5.3
implied vol2.1
debt equity9.8
  • ▸High IV: 67%
  • ▸Concentration risks: 2 MED (10-K Item 1A)

Catalyst

4.8/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
erm5.0
earnings history3.3
earnings timing5.0
surprise avg4.2
dividend safety5.5
news activity6.0
  • ▸Earnings concerns: 2B/2M
  • ▸Dividend: 4.1%

How the verdict was assembled

Engine trigger

Quality below minimum threshold.

Engine technical detail
verdict_path: L1:HARD_BLOCK:QUALITY_FLOOR
Passed (6)
  • MOMENTUM:6.1>=5.5
  • INSIDER:OK
  • NEWS_EVENTS:NONE_RECENT
  • EARNINGS_PROXIMITY:107d clear
  • SEMI_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
  • MATERIALS_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
Failed (2)
  • ASYMMETRY:-0.8=NEGATIVE
  • 8K_CRITICAL:4.01
Warning (0)

none

Reward-to-Risk
-0.81
Upside
-4.8%
Downside
5.9%
Sizing output
AVOID

SetupBreakout — Golden cross, above all MAs, RSI 61, MACD bullish

EdgeInst Constrain — Small cap ($0.7B) below institutional reach

SuitabilitySpeculative — Binary industry: Insurance - Property & Casualty

Investment implication

The SELL_IF_HOLDING verdict reflects the ASYMMETRY gate's -0.8=NEGATIVE outcome against Value at 9.0 and asymmetric R:R of -0.81.

The strongest dimensions are Value at 9.0, Insider at 7.0, and Sentiment at 6.5; the weakest are Growth at 0.8, Quality at 2.8, and Technical at 4.6. The V9 engine flagged 2 failed gates, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of -0.81 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.

What would invalidate the thesis

Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.

  • P1Price Above Analyst Target

    Trip ifAnalyst target rises above $22 from the current $17.85.

  • P2Notable Insider Buying

    Trip ifInsiders sell more than $1M in net value over a 90-day period.

  • P3Attractive Valuation And Dividend

    Trip ifForward P/E rises above 14x from the current 10.0x.

  • P4Weak Quality Slipping Revenue

    Trip ifFree cash flow to net income falls below 40% from the current 59%.

  • P5Uneven Earnings Surprises

    Trip ifEPS surprise stays below 0% for 2 consecutive quarters.

Engine reasoning is mechanically derived from pipeline gate outputs. See decision view.

Home › Stocks › DGICA › Why this verdict