Value
6.2/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 0.1 |
| P/S | 9.9 |
| EV/EBITDA | 3.5 |
| Fwd P/E | 9.1 |
| PEG | 10.0 |
| Analyst target | 3.0 |
- ▸Forward P/E: 11.6x
- ▸PEG: 0.02
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
Corsair trades at a PEG ratio of just 0.02 and a forward P/E of 11.6x, screening as deeply undervalued relative to its earnings growth profile. Valuation breakdown | The PEG ratio remains below 0.3 and forward P/E stays under 15x over the next 12 months if the cheap valuation persists. | →Stable |
| CounterRevenue is declining 4% YoY, and the analyst target has already been reached with only -13.9% theoretical upside, suggesting the cheap multiple already reflects limited growth expectations. | ||
Corsair converts 842% of net income into free cash flow and holds a strong Piotroski F-Score of 8/9, indicating high-quality earnings even amid declining revenue. Quality breakdown | FCF-to-net-income conversion stays above 200% and the Piotroski F-Score remains at 7 or higher over the next fiscal year. | →Stable |
| CounterThe overall quality score of 3.8 sits below the engine's 4.0 floor, and 'no competitive moat' suggests the strong cash conversion may not be durable if competitive pressure intensifies. | ||
Corsair's asymmetry ratio is negative at -1.06, with the analyst target already reached, signaling the engine's risk/reward framework views the stock as having exhausted its near-term upside. Reward-to-risk math | The asymmetry ratio should turn positive within 2 quarters for the setup to become attractive again. | →Stable |
| CounterA resumption of earnings beats could prompt analyst target upgrades that mechanically restore positive asymmetry. | ||
Corsair trades above its 200-day moving average with rising on-balance volume, a bullish technical signal despite fundamental quality sitting below the engine's floor. Momentum breakdown | Price remains above the 200-day moving average through the next 2 quarters. | →Stable |
| CounterAn 18% short interest and 75% implied volatility suggest a meaningful contingent of the market is positioned for a technical breakdown. | ||
An 18% short interest combined with below-average business quality reflects meaningful bearish positioning against Corsair, consistent with the engine's overall exit recommendation. Key risks | Short interest declines below 12% of float over the next 2 quarters if bearish sentiment eases. | →Stable |
| CounterHigh short interest alongside declining revenue and a sub-floor quality score could instead be a leading indicator that the stock has further to fall. | ||
CounterRevenue is declining 4% YoY, and the analyst target has already been reached with only -13.9% theoretical upside, suggesting the cheap multiple already reflects limited growth expectations.
CounterThe overall quality score of 3.8 sits below the engine's 4.0 floor, and 'no competitive moat' suggests the strong cash conversion may not be durable if competitive pressure intensifies.
CounterA resumption of earnings beats could prompt analyst target upgrades that mechanically restore positive asymmetry.
CounterAn 18% short interest and 75% implied volatility suggest a meaningful contingent of the market is positioned for a technical breakdown.
CounterHigh short interest alongside declining revenue and a sub-floor quality score could instead be a leading indicator that the stock has further to fall.
Corsair Gaming screens statistically cheap with strong cash conversion and a solid Piotroski score, but declining revenue, a sub-floor quality score, negative asymmetry, and 18% short interest drive the engine's exit recommendation.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 0.1 |
| P/S | 9.9 |
| EV/EBITDA | 3.5 |
| Fwd P/E | 9.1 |
| PEG | 10.0 |
| Analyst target | 3.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 0.4 |
| ROA | 0.7 |
| Gross margin | 2.0 |
| Op margin | 1.6 |
| Net margin | 0.2 |
| Current ratio | 6.2 |
| FCF quality | 10.0 |
| Moat | 4.6 |
| Piotroski F | 8.9 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 1.5 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 5.5 |
| MACD | 3.4 |
| OBV | 10.0 |
| MA position | 9.0 |
| Volume | 1.3 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Analyst rating | 5.0 |
| Price target | 4.6 |
| erm sentiment | 4.3 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| materiality | 5.0 |
| holder change | 5.1 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 4.9 |
| quality rank | 2.7 |
| growth rank | 0.6 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 3.4 |
| support resistance | 4.7 |
| 52w position | 3.8 |
| gap | 5.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 1.1 |
| days to cover | 8.9 |
| volatility | 0.0 |
| put call | 10.0 |
| implied vol | 0.0 |
| max pain risk | 3.0 |
| beta | 3.8 |
| debt equity | 8.9 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 5.0 |
| earnings history | 3.3 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 4.9 |
Quality below minimum threshold.
L1:HARD_BLOCKnone
SetupRange Bound — RSI 58 mid-range, Bollinger mid-band
EdgeNo clear edge — No clear edge identified
SuitabilityAggressive — Beta 1.85>1.3, MCap $1.0B<$5B
The L1 gate blocked the positive-verdict path: a hard-floor threshold was breached, so dimensional pillars — including Value at 6.2 could not lift the engine output above the verdict floor. Failed gate signal: ASYMMETRY:-1.2=NEGATIVE.
The strongest dimensions are Value at 6.2, Momentum at 5.8, and Insider at 5.0; the weakest are Growth at 1.5, Peer rank at 2.0, and Quality at 3.8. The V9 engine flagged 1 failed gate, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of -1.22 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
Trip ifRevenue growth falls below -8% YoY in the next reported quarter, confirming deterioration rather than undervaluation.
Trip ifFCF-to-net-income conversion falls below 100% or the Piotroski F-Score drops below 6 at the next annual assessment.
Trip ifThe asymmetry ratio stays below -0.5 for 2 consecutive quarterly refreshes.
Trip ifPrice closes below the 200-day moving average for more than 10 consecutive trading days, or short interest rises above 25%.
Trip ifShort interest rises above 25% of float while the quality score remains below 4.0.