Skip to main content
CRH · Why this verdict

Why CRH (CRH) is rated HOLD

Updated

Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results. How we score · Editorial policy

Show full disclosure ▾

About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.

Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.

Conflicts and positions. People who build TrendMatrix, or entities they control, may hold positions, long or short, in securities it covers, and may trade them at any time. Positions are not disclosed individually. Verdicts are generated by an automated model applied by the same rules to every covered stock, and are not adjusted for any position held by the people who build TrendMatrix. We do not accept payment from issuers for coverage.

No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security.

No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.

Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.

Methodology · Editorial policy & full disclaimer

VerdictHOLD
Overall score5.2/10
ConfidenceMEDIUM
MacroRISK_OFF
TrendMatrix Research · core thesis

Engine thesis — one sentence

CRH trades with roughly 17% headroom to the near-term price objective and a 2.6-to-1 reward-to-risk setup in your favor, but poor free cash flow conversion at 21% of net income, a recent earnings miss, and a death-cross technical configuration temper the case for adding exposure — the setup favors caution over conviction.

Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.

Thesis pillars

Sell-side consensus implies approximately 30% upside from current levels, with the near-term price objective roughly 17% above current price — providing a risk/reward of about 2.6-to-1 in your favor that makes the pricing geometry one of the more constructive aspects of the current setup.

↑Improving
Sentiment breakdown
Expectation
Price approaches the take-profit objective of $128 over the next 12 months as construction demand remains stable and analyst targets hold at or above current consensus.

CounterAnalyst price targets in building-materials names are frequently calibrated to cyclical peaks; a construction activity slowdown or commodity cost increase could trigger a round of target reductions that compress both the implied upside and the discount simultaneously, leaving the setup far less attractive than the current geometry suggests.

Free cash flow represents only 21% of reported net income — converting just 21 cents of every dollar of accounting earnings into actual cash — which raises concerns about earnings quality and limits the company's capacity to fund shareholder returns or service debt organically.

↓Deteriorating
Quality breakdown
Expectation
Free cash flow conversion improves above 50% of net income for two consecutive quarters, closing the earnings quality gap and removing the red flag designation.

CounterA Piotroski F-Score of 8 out of 9 indicates strong balance sheet mechanics; the low FCF-to-net-income ratio may reflect timing differences in working capital or lumpy capital expenditure rather than a structural quality problem, and may improve without any deterioration in operating performance.

The stock sits in a death-cross configuration but the long-term moving average is still rising at half a percent per month and MACD has turned constructive — the momentum profile describes this as a pullback within a broader uptrend rather than a confirmed breakdown, leaving the recovery thesis open.

↑Improving
Momentum breakdown
Expectation
Price reclaims the 200-day moving average and RSI holds above 50 for at least two consecutive months, confirming a recovery rather than continued distribution.

CounterA death cross in place means the near-term trend is still down despite MACD improvement; in a cyclical sector, interim inflection signals can reverse if macro or end-market conditions weaken before the technical pattern fully resolves into a confirmed recovery.

A beat on the most recent quarter was preceded by a narrow miss in the prior period and two positive surprises in the two earlier quarters — three of four quarters on the right side of consensus — with the most recent beat suggesting the miss may have been an isolated event rather than a deteriorating trend.

↓Deteriorating
Bull case
Expectation
Beat rate improves to at least three of the next four quarters with average positive surprise above 2%, reinstating consistent execution and reducing the risk that the miss recurs.

CounterAverage positive surprise of only 2% leaves almost no margin for operational variance; in a building-materials business exposed to commodity costs and construction volumes, a single unfavorable quarter could easily produce another miss and erode confidence in the earnings story.

Per-dimension breakdown

Value

6.9/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
P/E7.0
P/S9.2
EV/EBITDA5.5
Fwd P/E7.7
PEG4.8
Analyst target7.5
  • ▸Forward P/E: 15.9x
  • ▸PEG: 1.74

Quality

5.1/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
ROE4.6
ROA3.8
Gross margin3.2
Op margin7.3
Net margin4.6
Current ratio5.4
FCF quality4.9
Moat5.0
Piotroski F6.7
  • ▸Earnings quality warning: 64% FCF/NI
  • ▸No competitive moat

Growth

1.6/10data confidence 67%
ComponentSub-score
Rev growth3.2
EPS growth0.0

Momentum

6.1/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
RSI2.4
MACD10.0
OBV10.0
MA position6.0
Volume2.2
  • ▸Overbought bear rally (RSI 79)
  • ▸Volume accumulation (rising OBV)
  • ▸Below 200-MA, MA slope -5.5%/30d — confirmed downtrend

Sentiment

8.2/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
LLM sentiment7.0
Analyst rating9.0
Price target8.5
  • ▸LLM news sentiment: +0.40 (n=4)
  • ▸Analyst upside: 29%

Insider

5.9/10data confidence 75%
ComponentSub-score
materiality5.0
holder change5.7
notable moves7.0
  • ▸No net insider activity — $0 (0.000% of mkt cap)

Peer rank

3.9/10data confidence 80%
ComponentSub-score
value rank6.1
quality rank4.6
growth rank2.9

Technical

2.2/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
bollinger0.5
support resistance1.9
52w position4.3

Risk (lower is worse)

6.0/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
short interest8.9
days to cover8.6
volatility4.6
put call6.3
implied vol4.0
max pain risk3.0
beta6.1
debt equity6.1
news risk6.0
  • ▸Above max pain $70

Catalyst

6.1/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
erm5.0
earnings history6.7
earnings timing5.0
surprise avg5.3
dividend safety6.8
news activity8.0
  • ▸Strong earnings: 3B/1M

How the verdict was assembled

Engine trigger

Multiple concerning factors. Consider reducing position. | News modifier +2 (SELL_IF_HOLDING → HOLD_IF_HOLDING).

Engine technical detail
verdict_path: L4:PATH_F_SELL|L3:NEWS_MOD=+2
Passed (8)
  • MOMENTUM:6.1>=5.5
  • INSIDER:OK
  • 8K:CLEAN
  • NEWS_BOOST:ANALYST:0.60
  • NEWS_BOOST:ANALYST_CLUSTER(3)
  • EARNINGS_PROXIMITY:106d clear
  • SEMI_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
  • MATERIALS_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
Failed (1)
  • ASYMMETRY:1.1<1.5@spot
Warning (1)
  • DEATH_CROSS:momentum=6.1>=5.0 recovering
Reward-to-Risk
1.10
Upside
+16.4%
Downside
15.0%
Sizing output
AVOID

SetupRecovery — Death cross but MACD improving, RSI 79

EdgeNo clear edge — No clear edge identified

SuitabilityModerate — Balanced profile

Investment implication

The F-path SELL output reflects an overall score of 4.6 below the 5.6 soft trigger — multiple weakening dimensions accumulated rather than a single hard-floor breach. The strongest dimension ( Sentiment at 8.2) was not enough to lift the adjusted overall above the threshold. Co-occurring failed gates ( ASYMMETRY:1.1<1.5@spot) reinforce the read. Current asymmetry R:R is 1.10 — supplementary context, not the trigger for this path.

The strongest dimensions are Sentiment at 8.2, Value at 6.9, and Momentum at 6.1; the weakest are Growth at 1.6, Technical at 2.2, and Peer rank at 3.9. The V9 engine flagged 1 failed gate with 1 warning, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of 1.10 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.

What would invalidate the thesis

Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.

  • P1Analyst Consensus Recovery Upside

    Trip ifAnalyst consensus price target falls below $110 for 2 consecutive quarters, eliminating the implied discount.

  • P2Poor Free Cash Flow Conversion

    Trip ifFree cash flow conversion rises above 60% of net income for 2 consecutive quarters, resolving the quality concern.

  • P3Technical Recovery Not Confirmed

    Trip ifThe 200-day moving-average slope falls below 0% for 2 consecutive months, confirming a downtrend rather than a pullback.

  • P4Earnings Beat Record One Miss

    Trip ifEPS surprise falls below 0% for 2 consecutive quarters.

Engine reasoning is mechanically derived from pipeline gate outputs. See decision view.

Home › Stocks › CRH › Why this verdict