Value
9.6/10data confidence 83%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/S | 10.0 |
| EV/EBITDA | 8.8 |
| Fwd P/E | 10.0 |
| PEG | 10.0 |
| Analyst target | 9.0 |
- ▸Forward P/E: 2.0x
- ▸PEG: 0.32
- ▸Attractively valued
CNXC · Why this verdict
Why Concentrix (CNXC) is rated SELL
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Show full disclosure ▾Hide full disclosure ▴
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
VerdictSELL
Overall score5.0/10
ConfidenceMEDIUM
MacroNEUTRAL
Thesis pillars
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
At a forward price-to-earnings of 2.0x and a price-to-earnings-to-growth ratio of 0.25, the stock screens in the top tier of the peer value universe, and the risk/reward of roughly 4.8 to 1 in favor of upside to the $35.06 analyst consensus target implies a material margin of safety if business fundamentals stabilize. Value | Stock price rises toward the $35 analyst consensus target within 12 months as the valuation gap closes on improving business fundamentals. | →Stable |
| CounterA 2.0x forward price-to-earnings ratio may reflect genuine structural deterioration rather than a temporary dislocation; if earnings estimates are revised lower, the apparent discount could narrow or disappear without any stock price recovery. | ||
Business quality scores 2.6 against a 4.0 minimum floor, with thin margins across all measured dimensions and no competitive moat—a combination suggesting the company lacks the pricing power and operational leverage needed to sustain returns through a business cycle. Quality | Quality score rises above 4.0 for 2 consecutive quarters, driven by measurable margin expansion and evidence of competitive differentiation beyond scale. | →Stable |
| CounterInformation technology services companies can operate on structurally thin margins while generating consistent cash flows from high-renewal contracts; the low quality score may not fully capture the stability of long-term client relationships. | ||
The stock trades below its 200-day moving average, with the moving average itself declining at a rate of 9.3% over 30 days, and a death cross pattern constitutes a hard technical block—conditions the data characterizes as a confirmed downtrend rather than a temporary pullback. Momentum | Price crosses back above the 200-day moving average and the MA slope turns positive for at least 2 consecutive months, signaling a durable trend reversal that removes the technical hard block. | →Stable |
| CounterEarnings results in 13 days could be the catalyst that shifts price momentum rapidly; a positive earnings surprise could begin reversing the technical picture before the longer-term trend has fully resolved. | ||
Short interest stands at 20% of shares outstanding, a level the data labels as justified by the fundamentals, indicating a significant cohort of institutional investors expects further price decline—and implied volatility of 111% prices in substantial uncertainty about the near-term outcome. Risk | Short interest falls below 10% over a 3-month window, suggesting the bearish thesis has been resolved and short sellers are exiting positions. | →Stable |
| CounterThe options market tells a different story—the put/call ratio of 0.29 indicates call options significantly outnumber puts, suggesting option market participants are positioned for upside even as short sellers dominate the equity market; this contradiction may resolve favorably with earnings. | ||
At a forward price-to-earnings of 2.0x and a price-to-earnings-to-growth ratio of 0.25, the stock screens in the top tier of the peer value universe, and the risk/reward of roughly 4.8 to 1 in favor of upside to the $35.06 analyst consensus target implies a material margin of safety if business fundamentals stabilize.
→StableValue
- Expectation
- Stock price rises toward the $35 analyst consensus target within 12 months as the valuation gap closes on improving business fundamentals.
CounterA 2.0x forward price-to-earnings ratio may reflect genuine structural deterioration rather than a temporary dislocation; if earnings estimates are revised lower, the apparent discount could narrow or disappear without any stock price recovery.
Business quality scores 2.6 against a 4.0 minimum floor, with thin margins across all measured dimensions and no competitive moat—a combination suggesting the company lacks the pricing power and operational leverage needed to sustain returns through a business cycle.
→StableQuality
- Expectation
- Quality score rises above 4.0 for 2 consecutive quarters, driven by measurable margin expansion and evidence of competitive differentiation beyond scale.
CounterInformation technology services companies can operate on structurally thin margins while generating consistent cash flows from high-renewal contracts; the low quality score may not fully capture the stability of long-term client relationships.
The stock trades below its 200-day moving average, with the moving average itself declining at a rate of 9.3% over 30 days, and a death cross pattern constitutes a hard technical block—conditions the data characterizes as a confirmed downtrend rather than a temporary pullback.
→StableMomentum
- Expectation
- Price crosses back above the 200-day moving average and the MA slope turns positive for at least 2 consecutive months, signaling a durable trend reversal that removes the technical hard block.
CounterEarnings results in 13 days could be the catalyst that shifts price momentum rapidly; a positive earnings surprise could begin reversing the technical picture before the longer-term trend has fully resolved.
Short interest stands at 20% of shares outstanding, a level the data labels as justified by the fundamentals, indicating a significant cohort of institutional investors expects further price decline—and implied volatility of 111% prices in substantial uncertainty about the near-term outcome.
→StableRisk
- Expectation
- Short interest falls below 10% over a 3-month window, suggesting the bearish thesis has been resolved and short sellers are exiting positions.
CounterThe options market tells a different story—the put/call ratio of 0.29 indicates call options significantly outnumber puts, suggesting option market participants are positioned for upside even as short sellers dominate the equity market; this contradiction may resolve favorably with earnings.
TrendMatrix Research · core thesis
Engine thesis — one sentence
Concentrix offers a striking valuation discount at a forward price-to-earnings of 2.0x with 33.9% upside to the analyst consensus target and a risk/reward of roughly 4.8 to 1, but a confirmed death cross, a moving average slope declining at 9.3% over 30 days, business quality of 2.6 below the minimum threshold, and a 20% short interest indicate the market is pricing in ongoing fundamental deterioration rather than a temporary dislocation.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
Per-dimension breakdown
Quality
2.6/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 0.0 |
| ROA | 1.8 |
| Gross margin | 2.8 |
| Op margin | 1.6 |
| Net margin | 0.0 |
| Current ratio | 4.5 |
| Moat | 3.1 |
| Piotroski F | 6.7 |
- ▸No competitive moat
- ▸Quality concerns
Growth
6.2/10data confidence 67%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 3.0 |
| EPS growth | 9.3 |
Momentum
2.0/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 4.5 |
| MACD | 0.1 |
| OBV | 1.0 |
| MA position | 1.0 |
| Volume | 3.4 |
- ▸Volume distribution (falling OBV)
- ▸Below 200-MA, MA slope -9.0%/30d — confirmed downtrend
Sentiment
6.6/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| LLM sentiment | 4.1 |
| Analyst rating | 6.3 |
| Price target | 9.5 |
- ▸Light analyst coverage (4.0) — signal dampened
- ▸Analyst upside: 49%
Insider
4.0/10data confidence 75%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| materiality | 2.0 |
| insider conviction | 5.0 |
| holder change | 5.1 |
- ▸Heavy insider selling — $133,430,131 (9.289% of mkt cap)
Peer rank
3.2/10data confidence 80%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 9.1 |
| quality rank | 0.7 |
| growth rank | 3.2 |
Technical
4.8/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 7.7 |
| support resistance | 5.7 |
| 52w position | 0.0 |
| gap | 6.0 |
Risk (lower is worse)
4.0/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 1.6 |
| days to cover | 1.2 |
| volatility | 0.0 |
| put call | 10.0 |
| implied vol | 0.0 |
| beta | 10.0 |
| debt equity | 3.6 |
| news risk | 6.0 |
- ▸High short interest justified: 19%
- ▸High IV: 93%
Catalyst
4.4/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 5.0 |
| earnings history | 0.0 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 2.1 |
| dividend safety | 6.0 |
| news activity | 8.0 |
- ▸Earnings concerns: 1B/3M
- ▸Dividend: 610.0%
How the verdict was assembled
Engine trigger
Quality below minimum threshold.
Engine technical detail
verdict_path:
L1:HARD_BLOCKPassed (4)
- ASYMMETRY:1.8>=1.5
- EARNINGS_PROXIMITY:83d clear
- SEMI_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
- MATERIALS_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
Failed (3)
- MOMENTUM:2.0<4.5
- INSIDER:9.29%=EXTREME
- DEATH_CROSS:HARD_BLOCK
Warning (1)
- 8K_CSUITE_CHANGE:5.02 (officer departure/appointment)
Reward-to-Risk
1.80
Upside
+27.0%
Downside
15.0%
Sizing output
AVOID
Setup— — No clear chart pattern; technical signals are mixed
EdgeInst Constrain — Small cap ($1.4B) below institutional reach
SuitabilitySpeculative — Drawdown -61% (>40% off 52w high)
Investment implication
The L1 gate blocked the positive-verdict path: a hard-floor threshold was breached, so dimensional pillars — including Value at 9.6 could not lift the engine output above the verdict floor. Failed gate signal: MOMENTUM:2.0<4.5.
The strongest dimensions are Value at 9.6, Sentiment at 6.6, and Growth at 6.2; the weakest are Momentum at 2.0, Quality at 2.6, and Peer rank at 3.2. The V9 engine flagged 3 failed gates with 1 warning, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of 1.80 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
What would invalidate the thesis
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
- P1Deep Value Discount Substantial Upside
Trip ifOperating income falls below $0 for 2 consecutive quarters.
- P2Confirmed Downtrend Death Cross
Trip ifPrice crosses above the 200-day moving average and MA slope turns positive for 2 consecutive months.
- P3Quality Below Minimum Threshold
Trip ifQuality score rises above 4.0 for 2 consecutive quarters.
- P4High Short Interest Institutional Skepticism
Trip ifShort interest falls below 10% of shares outstanding over a 3-month period.