Value
8.4/10data confidence 83%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/S | 10.0 |
| EV/EBITDA | 3.0 |
| Fwd P/E | 9.8 |
| PEG | 10.0 |
| Analyst target | 9.0 |
- ▸Forward P/E: 6.7x
- ▸PEG: 0.05
- ▸Attractively valued
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
Columbus McKinnon screens as an industry growth leader trading at a modest gap to its analyst target, but cash-burning free cash flow, elevated short interest, and a flagged dividend yield trap keep overall business quality below the engine's minimum bar.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
Columbus McKinnon's quality score of 3.1 sits below the 4.0 floor, driven by cash-burning free cash flow at -17% of revenue despite the business having no clear competitive moat. Quality breakdown | Free cash flow margin should turn positive and the quality score should rise back above 4.0 within 12 months. | →Stable |
| CounterTemporary FCF burn during a restructuring or integration period (e.g. post-acquisition) can reverse quickly without indicating structural quality problems. | ||
Short interest of 31% and a put/call ratio of 1.44 signal the market sees meaningful downside risk in the stock. Key risks | Short interest should decline below 20% over the next 12 months if the bearish thesis doesn't materialize. | ↑Improving |
| CounterHigh short interest against improving fundamentals can set up a short-covering rally rather than confirm a bearish case. | ||
Columbus McKinnon is ranked as an industry growth leader, with revenue growth scored 125% YoY in the engine's growth dimension. Peer-rank breakdown | Revenue growth should stay elevated relative to industry peers over the next 12 months, sustaining the growth leadership ranking. | →Stable |
| CounterA single-period growth spike, potentially from an acquisition or an easy prior-year comparison, may not be sustainable at the same pace. | ||
The engine flags a yield-trap warning: the dividend yield looks attractive on the surface but is assessed as unsafe given the underlying cash flow profile. Catalyst breakdown | Dividend safety metrics should improve, or the company should avoid a dividend cut, over the next 12 months. | →Stable |
| CounterA company can sustain a seemingly risky payout for a while if it has access to credit facilities or asset sales, delaying any cut well beyond a 12-month window. | ||
The stock trades 17.3% below the analyst price target, a modest gap that limits near-term reward relative to the risk in a quality-constrained name. Estimated upside | The stock should close most of the 17.3% gap toward the analyst target over the next 12 months if fundamentals stabilize. | →Stable |
| CounterA narrow gap to target leaves little margin of safety if estimates are revised down, especially given the quality and cash-burn concerns. | ||
CounterTemporary FCF burn during a restructuring or integration period (e.g. post-acquisition) can reverse quickly without indicating structural quality problems.
CounterHigh short interest against improving fundamentals can set up a short-covering rally rather than confirm a bearish case.
CounterA single-period growth spike, potentially from an acquisition or an easy prior-year comparison, may not be sustainable at the same pace.
CounterA company can sustain a seemingly risky payout for a while if it has access to credit facilities or asset sales, delaying any cut well beyond a 12-month window.
CounterA narrow gap to target leaves little margin of safety if estimates are revised down, especially given the quality and cash-burn concerns.
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/S | 10.0 |
| EV/EBITDA | 3.0 |
| Fwd P/E | 9.8 |
| PEG | 10.0 |
| Analyst target | 9.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 0.0 |
| ROA | 1.7 |
| Gross margin | 3.0 |
| Op margin | 4.2 |
| Net margin | 0.0 |
| Current ratio | 7.0 |
| FCF quality | 0.0 |
| Moat | 5.0 |
| Piotroski F | 6.7 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 10.0 |
| EPS growth | 10.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 5.5 |
| MACD | 2.1 |
| OBV | 10.0 |
| MA position | 6.0 |
| Volume | 3.7 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Analyst rating | 5.0 |
| Price target | 9.5 |
| erm sentiment | 5.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| materiality | 6.5 |
| holder change | 5.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 7.8 |
| quality rank | 0.0 |
| growth rank | 9.4 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 7.0 |
| support resistance | 7.8 |
| 52w position | 4.6 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 0.4 |
| days to cover | 8.0 |
| volatility | 2.3 |
| put call | 10.0 |
| implied vol | 0.0 |
| max pain risk | 7.0 |
| beta | 5.6 |
| debt equity | 3.4 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 5.0 |
| earnings history | 6.7 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 10.0 |
| dividend safety | 4.3 |
Quality below minimum threshold.
L1:HARD_BLOCK:QUALITY_FLOORnone
Setup— — No clear chart pattern; technical signals are mixed
EdgeInst Constrain — Small cap ($0.5B) below institutional reach
SuitabilityAggressive — Beta 1.36>1.3, MCap $0.5B<$5B
The SELL_IF_HOLDING verdict reflects clean gate clearance against Growth at 10.0 and asymmetric R:R of 3.12.
The strongest dimensions are Growth at 10.0, Value at 8.4, and Sentiment at 6.5; the weakest are Quality at 3.1, Risk (lower is worse) at 4.6, and Peer rank at 4.9. The V9 engine cleared all gates with 1 warning, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of 3.12 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
Trip ifFree cash flow margin rises above 0% of revenue for 2 consecutive quarters.
Trip ifShort interest falls below 15% from the current 31%.
Trip ifRevenue growth falls below 10% YoY for 2 consecutive quarters.
Trip ifThe company cuts its dividend by more than 25%.
Trip ifThe gap to the analyst target compresses below 5%, from the current 17.3%.