Value
8.1/10data confidence 83%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/S | 10.0 |
| EV/EBITDA | 3.0 |
| Fwd P/E | 9.8 |
| PEG | 10.0 |
| Analyst target | 7.5 |
- ▸Forward P/E: 6.7x
- ▸PEG: 0.05
- ▸Attractively valued
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
Columbus McKinnon combines a statistically cheap valuation and triple-digit YoY growth with real quality concerns — negative free cash flow, no economic moat, a yield-trap dividend warning, and heavy volume-driven selling into an overbought technical setup.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
Columbus McKinnon trades at a cheap forward valuation, with a forward P/E of 7.4x and PEG of 0.06 per the value dimension's notes. Valuation breakdown | A re-rating would show the forward P/E expanding toward double digits over the next 12 months as growth is recognized. | ↑Improving |
| CounterA cheap multiple alongside a below-floor quality score and cash burn can indicate a value trap rather than a genuine bargain. | ||
Columbus McKinnon posted strong growth of 125% YoY, per the growth dimension's notes. Growth breakdown | If durable, revenue growth should stay above 30% YoY over the next 12 months. | →Stable |
| CounterA 125% YoY growth rate this large is often driven by an easy prior-year comparison or one-time acquisition effects rather than organic momentum. | ||
Columbus McKinnon is cash-burning, with free cash flow at -17% of revenue and no competitive moat, driving its quality score below the 4.0 floor. Quality breakdown | A resolving quality picture would show FCF turning positive within 12 months. | →Stable |
| CounterNegative FCF can reflect temporary working-capital investment tied to the reported growth rather than a structural problem. | ||
Columbus McKinnon is overbought (RSI 72) even as a 3.5x average-volume surge accompanied a recent selloff, per the momentum notes. Momentum breakdown | A healthy resolution would show volume normalizing without RSI breaking down below 40 over the next few months. | Tripped↓Deteriorating |
| CounterA volume surge on a selloff while RSI remains elevated often marks the start of a larger distribution phase rather than a one-off event. | ||
Columbus McKinnon carries a yield-trap warning — a high dividend yield flagged by the engine as unsafe given underlying cash generation. Catalyst breakdown | A sustainable payout would avoid a dividend cut over the next 12 months despite the warning. | →Stable |
| CounterYield-trap warnings are probabilistic flags, not certainties, and the dividend could persist if earnings stabilize. | ||
CounterA cheap multiple alongside a below-floor quality score and cash burn can indicate a value trap rather than a genuine bargain.
CounterA 125% YoY growth rate this large is often driven by an easy prior-year comparison or one-time acquisition effects rather than organic momentum.
CounterNegative FCF can reflect temporary working-capital investment tied to the reported growth rather than a structural problem.
CounterA volume surge on a selloff while RSI remains elevated often marks the start of a larger distribution phase rather than a one-off event.
CounterYield-trap warnings are probabilistic flags, not certainties, and the dividend could persist if earnings stabilize.
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/S | 10.0 |
| EV/EBITDA | 3.0 |
| Fwd P/E | 9.8 |
| PEG | 10.0 |
| Analyst target | 7.5 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 0.0 |
| ROA | 1.7 |
| Gross margin | 3.0 |
| Op margin | 4.2 |
| Net margin | 0.0 |
| Current ratio | 7.0 |
| FCF quality | 0.0 |
| Moat | 5.0 |
| Piotroski F | 6.7 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 10.0 |
| EPS growth | 10.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 8.2 |
| MACD | 0.0 |
| OBV | 1.0 |
| MA position | 6.0 |
| Volume | 0.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Analyst rating | 6.3 |
| Price target | 9.4 |
| erm sentiment | 5.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| materiality | 6.5 |
| holder change | 5.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 7.2 |
| quality rank | 0.0 |
| growth rank | 9.4 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 6.2 |
| support resistance | 5.9 |
| 52w position | 4.7 |
| gap | 5.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 0.6 |
| days to cover | 8.2 |
| volatility | 0.0 |
| put call | 10.0 |
| implied vol | 0.0 |
| beta | 5.5 |
| debt equity | 3.4 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 5.0 |
| earnings history | 6.7 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 10.0 |
| dividend safety | 4.3 |
Quality below minimum threshold.
L1:HARD_BLOCK:QUALITY_FLOORnone
Setup— — No clear chart pattern; technical signals are mixed
EdgeInst Constrain — Small cap ($0.5B) below institutional reach
SuitabilityAggressive — Beta 1.37>1.3, MCap $0.5B<$5B
The SELL_IF_HOLDING verdict reflects the MOMENTUM gate's 3.0<4.5 outcome against Growth at 10.0 and asymmetric R:R of 1.66.
The strongest dimensions are Growth at 10.0, Value at 8.1, and Sentiment at 7.0; the weakest are Momentum at 3.0, Quality at 3.1, and Risk (lower is worse) at 4.0. The V9 engine flagged 1 failed gate, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of 1.66 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
Trip ifForward P/E expands above 15x (from current 7.4x) without a corresponding improvement in earnings.
Trip ifRevenue growth decelerates below 20% YoY (from current 125%).
Trip ifFree cash flow turns positive, exceeding 0% of revenue (from current -17%).
Trip ifRSI falls below 50 alongside a break below the 200-day moving average, confirming momentum has reversed.
Trip ifThe dividend is cut by more than 25%, confirming the yield-trap warning.