Skip to main content
CERSCerus CorporationSell6.0·$3.19+6.40%
CERS · Why this verdict

Why Cerus (CERS) is rated SELL

Updated

Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Show full disclosure ▾

About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.

Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.

Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.

No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.

No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.

Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.

Methodology · Editorial policy & full disclaimer

VerdictSELL
Overall score6.0/10
ConfidenceMEDIUM
MacroNEUTRAL

Per-dimension breakdown

Value

8.7/10data confidence 33%
ComponentSub-score
P/S8.3
Analyst target9.0
  • Attractively valued

Quality

3.1/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
ROE0.0
ROA0.0
Gross margin6.6
Op margin0.0
Net margin0.0
Current ratio5.9
FCF quality3.2
Moat5.8
Piotroski F6.7
  • FCF-positive but moderate margins (FCF margin 1%, FCF yield 0.4%)

Growth

8.5/10data confidence 33%
ComponentSub-score
Rev growth8.5
  • Strong growth: 24% YoY

Momentum

7.0/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
RSI4.3
MACD7.4
OBV10.0
MA position9.0
Volume4.2
  • Overbought (RSI 74)
  • Volume accumulation (rising OBV)
  • Above 200-day MA

Sentiment

7.1/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
Analyst rating5.0
Price target9.5
erm sentiment7.2
  • Analyst upside: 48%
  • Estimates rising as sentiment proxy (+5.6%)

Insider

3.9/10data confidence 75%
ComponentSub-score
materiality4.5
insider conviction2.0
holder change5.2
  • Modest insider selling — $153,182 (0.024% of mkt cap)

Peer rank

4.1/10data confidence 80%
ComponentSub-score
value rank5.6
quality rank3.5
growth rank7.3

Technical

3.8/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
bollinger0.0
support resistance0.6
52w position9.7
gap5.0

Risk (lower is worse)

3.6/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
short interest4.9
days to cover2.2
volatility0.0
implied vol6.1
beta4.1
debt equity4.1

Catalyst

7.2/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
erm8.5
earnings history10.0
earnings timing5.0
surprise avg5.2
  • Estimates up 5.6% (30d)

How the verdict was assembled

Engine trigger

Quality below minimum threshold.

Engine technical detail
verdict_path: L1:HARD_BLOCK
Passed (8)
  • MOMENTUM:7.0>=5.5
  • ASYMMETRY:1.7>=1.5
  • INSIDER:OK
  • 8K:CLEAN
  • NEWS_EVENTS:NONE_RECENT
  • EARNINGS_PROXIMITY:31d clear
  • SEMI_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
  • MATERIALS_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
Failed (0)

none

Warning (0)

none

Reward-to-Risk
1.70
Upside
+25.5%
Downside
15.0%
Sizing output
AVOID

Setup No clear chart pattern; technical signals are mixed

EdgeInst Constrain Small cap ($0.6B) below institutional reach

SuitabilityAggressive Beta 1.77>1.3, MCap $0.6B<$5B

Investment implication

The L1 gate blocked the positive-verdict path: a hard-floor threshold was breached, so dimensional pillars — including Value at 8.7 could not lift the engine output above the verdict floor.

The strongest dimensions are Value at 8.7, Growth at 8.5, and Catalyst at 7.2; the weakest are Quality at 3.1, Risk (lower is worse) at 3.6, and Technical at 3.8. The V9 engine cleared all gates, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of 1.70 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.

Engine reasoning is mechanically derived from pipeline gate outputs. See decision view.

Home Stocks CERS Why this verdict