Value
7.6/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 8.4 |
| P/S | 8.0 |
| EV/EBITDA | 5.3 |
| Fwd P/E | 9.6 |
| PEG | 10.0 |
| Analyst target | 4.0 |
- ▸Forward P/E: 7.7x
- ▸PEG: 0.11
- ▸Attractively valued
CCEC · Why this verdict
Why Capital Clean Energy Carriers C (CCEC) is rated SELL
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Show full disclosure ▾Hide full disclosure ▴
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
VerdictSELL
Overall score5.8/10
ConfidenceMEDIUM
MacroNEUTRAL
Thesis pillars
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
Despite reported gross margins of 29%, free cash flow is negative — running at -156% relative to net income — which means the business is consuming cash rather than generating it, a structural concern that the strong headline margins obscure. Quality breakdown | Free cash flow turns positive and the FCF-to-net-income ratio exceeds 50% for 2 consecutive reported quarters, demonstrating that the cash conversion problem has resolved. | →Stable |
| CounterStrong reported margins of 29% indicate genuine operating profitability at the revenue level; if the cash flow gap is temporary in nature, the margin structure suggests meaningful potential for improvement if conditions allow. | ||
Three of the last four quarters produced positive earnings surprises — including the most recent quarter at 11% — with an average beat of over 18% across those three positive results, indicating a pattern of delivering above analyst estimates on a recurring basis. Earnings | The company continues to beat consensus in at least 3 of the next 4 quarters, sustaining the recent delivery track record. | →Stable |
| CounterThe one miss in the most recent four quarters came in at -11%, and declining revenue of 4% creates a headwind that could compress the operating results from which positive surprises are drawn. | ||
The stock is trading just below the analyst consensus target with only about 3% potential upside, and the reward-to-risk ratio at current prices is 0.43-to-1 — less than half of a neutral 1-to-1 balance — making entry geometry unfavorable for a new position. Price targets | Analyst consensus price targets rise to imply at least 15% upside from current levels, providing a basis for a more balanced risk/reward. | →Stable |
| CounterA stock approaching its analyst consensus ceiling can overshoot if near-term earnings catalysts surprise positively, as the three-of-four beat record suggests is possible. | ||
A put/call ratio of 3.87 — far above the neutral range — indicates options market participants are paying heavily for downside protection, signaling elevated concern about near-term price risk that is not reflected in the current price. Risk breakdown | The put/call ratio compresses below 1.5, signaling that the asymmetric hedging demand has normalized and downside risk concerns have diminished. | →Stable |
| CounterAn elevated put/call ratio can also reflect participants hedging existing long positions rather than expressing outright bearishness; the signal alone does not confirm that a price decline is imminent. | ||
Despite reported gross margins of 29%, free cash flow is negative — running at -156% relative to net income — which means the business is consuming cash rather than generating it, a structural concern that the strong headline margins obscure.
→StableQuality breakdown
- Expectation
- Free cash flow turns positive and the FCF-to-net-income ratio exceeds 50% for 2 consecutive reported quarters, demonstrating that the cash conversion problem has resolved.
CounterStrong reported margins of 29% indicate genuine operating profitability at the revenue level; if the cash flow gap is temporary in nature, the margin structure suggests meaningful potential for improvement if conditions allow.
Three of the last four quarters produced positive earnings surprises — including the most recent quarter at 11% — with an average beat of over 18% across those three positive results, indicating a pattern of delivering above analyst estimates on a recurring basis.
→StableEarnings
- Expectation
- The company continues to beat consensus in at least 3 of the next 4 quarters, sustaining the recent delivery track record.
CounterThe one miss in the most recent four quarters came in at -11%, and declining revenue of 4% creates a headwind that could compress the operating results from which positive surprises are drawn.
The stock is trading just below the analyst consensus target with only about 3% potential upside, and the reward-to-risk ratio at current prices is 0.43-to-1 — less than half of a neutral 1-to-1 balance — making entry geometry unfavorable for a new position.
→StablePrice targets
- Expectation
- Analyst consensus price targets rise to imply at least 15% upside from current levels, providing a basis for a more balanced risk/reward.
CounterA stock approaching its analyst consensus ceiling can overshoot if near-term earnings catalysts surprise positively, as the three-of-four beat record suggests is possible.
A put/call ratio of 3.87 — far above the neutral range — indicates options market participants are paying heavily for downside protection, signaling elevated concern about near-term price risk that is not reflected in the current price.
→StableRisk breakdown
- Expectation
- The put/call ratio compresses below 1.5, signaling that the asymmetric hedging demand has normalized and downside risk concerns have diminished.
CounterAn elevated put/call ratio can also reflect participants hedging existing long positions rather than expressing outright bearishness; the signal alone does not confirm that a price decline is imminent.
TrendMatrix Research · core thesis
Engine thesis — one sentence
With only about 3% headroom to the analyst consensus target and a reward-to-risk ratio of 0.43-to-1, the stock offers unfavorable entry geometry at current prices — and free cash flow that is deeply negative relative to net income, despite 29% reported margins, raises a structural quality concern that outweighs the company's three-of-four quarterly earnings beat record.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
Per-dimension breakdown
Quality
5.4/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 2.3 |
| ROA | 2.0 |
| Gross margin | 10.0 |
| Op margin | 10.0 |
| Net margin | 10.0 |
| Current ratio | 5.2 |
| FCF quality | 0.0 |
| Moat | 4.6 |
| Rule of 40 | 3.0 |
| Piotroski F | 6.7 |
- ▸Strong margins: 29%
- ▸Earnings quality RED FLAG: -156% FCF/NI
- ▸No competitive moat
- ▸Rule of 40: -49 (fail)
Growth
5.8/10data confidence 67%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 1.5 |
| EPS growth | 10.0 |
- ▸Declining revenue: -4%
Momentum
7.6/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 5.0 |
| MACD | 9.6 |
| OBV | 10.0 |
| MA position | 9.0 |
| Volume | 4.4 |
- ▸Volume accumulation (rising OBV)
- ▸Above 200-day MA
Sentiment
6.2/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Analyst rating | 6.6 |
| Price target | 6.8 |
| erm sentiment | 5.0 |
- ▸Light analyst coverage (6.0) — signal dampened
Insider
5.0/10data confidence 50%Peer rank
2.8/10data confidence 80%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 2.7 |
| quality rank | 5.4 |
| growth rank | 2.1 |
Technical
4.0/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 0.8 |
| support resistance | 1.7 |
| 52w position | 8.5 |
| gap | 5.0 |
Risk (lower is worse)
6.7/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 9.9 |
| days to cover | 8.4 |
| volatility | 3.6 |
| put call | 10.0 |
| implied vol | 2.1 |
| beta | 9.3 |
| debt equity | 3.6 |
- ▸High IV: 68%
Catalyst
6.4/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 5.0 |
| earnings history | 6.7 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 10.0 |
| dividend safety | 5.5 |
- ▸Strong earnings: 3B/1M
How the verdict was assembled
Engine trigger
Multiple concerning factors. Consider reducing position.
Engine technical detail
verdict_path:
L4:PATH_F_SELLPassed (7)
- MOMENTUM:7.6>=5.5
- INSIDER:OK
- 8K:CLEAN
- NEWS_EVENTS:NONE_RECENT
- EARNINGS_PROXIMITY:22d clear
- SEMI_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
- MATERIALS_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
Failed (1)
- ASYMMETRY:-0.2=NEGATIVE
Warning (0)
none
Reward-to-Risk
-0.17
Upside
-1.9%
Downside
11.3%
Sizing output
AVOID
SetupBreakout — Golden cross, above all MAs, RSI 63, MACD bullish
EdgeCatalyst-Driven — Earnings in 22d with 3/4 beat streak
SuitabilityAggressive — MCap $1.3B<$5B
Investment implication
The F-path SELL output reflects an overall score of 4.8 below the 5.6 soft trigger — multiple weakening dimensions accumulated rather than a single hard-floor breach. The strongest dimension ( Value at 7.6) was not enough to lift the adjusted overall above the threshold. Co-occurring failed gates ( ASYMMETRY:-0.2=NEGATIVE) reinforce the read. Current asymmetry R:R is -0.17 — supplementary context, not the trigger for this path.
The strongest dimensions are Value at 7.6, Momentum at 7.6, and Risk (lower is worse) at 6.7; the weakest are Peer rank at 2.8, Technical at 4.0, and Insider at 5.0. The V9 engine flagged 1 failed gate, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of -0.17 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
What would invalidate the thesis
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
- P1Earnings Beat Track Record
Trip ifEPS falls below analyst consensus in 2 consecutive quarters.
- P2Negative Fcf Despite Strong Margins
Trip ifFree cash flow turns positive and FCF-to-net-income ratio exceeds 50% for 2 consecutive quarters.
- P3Price At Target Unfavorable Geometry
Trip ifAnalyst consensus price target rises above $24.50, implying more than 15% upside from the current level.
- P4Options Market Bearish Positioning
Trip ifPut/call ratio falls below 1.5 for 2 consecutive observation periods.