Maryland, Virginia, Delaware and Washington, D.C.
“10-K Item 1: 'Approximately 78.5% of CBHL loan originations by volume occur within Maryland, Virginia, Delaware and Washington, D.C.'”
Updated
The most significant concentration Capital Bancorp discloses is Maryland, Virginia, Delaware and Washington, D.C. at 78.5%, classified HIGH by disclosed size. Below: the full set from the latest 10-K — verbatim quotes, filing references, and a synthesis of what these exposures mean together.
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
Source: Capital Bancorp’s SEC Form 10-K filed — view the filing on SEC EDGAR ↗
Each card carries a disclosed-size chip (HIGH / MEDIUM / LOW — how large the exposure is as a share of revenue, not how dangerous it is) and a nature tag: Built-in(the company’s own model, geography, or products) or Outside party (an external customer, supplier, or distributor it relies on).
“10-K Item 1: 'Approximately 78.5% of CBHL loan originations by volume occur within Maryland, Virginia, Delaware and Washington, D.C.'”
“10-K Item 1A: 'approximately 40.9% of our deposits were uninsured and 59.1% of our deposits were insured'”
“10-K Item 1A: 'Our commercial business and operations are concentrated in the greater Washington, D.C. and Baltimore metropolitan areas and we are sensitive to adverse changes in the local economy.'”
Capital Bancorp's concentration exposures are geographic and funding-related rather than counterparty-specific. Approximately 78.5% of loan originations by volume at its CBHL subsidiary occur within Maryland, Virginia, Delaware, and Washington, D.C. — a high-band structural exposure — while the bank's broader commercial business is concentrated in the greater Washington, D.C. and Baltimore metropolitan areas, a medium-band structural exposure. Together these tie a large share of loan performance to a single mid-Atlantic regional economy rather than a nationally diversified footprint. On funding, approximately 40.9% of deposits were uninsured, with 59.1% insured — a medium-band structural exposure that is a function of the bank's deposit mix rather than a specific depositor relationship. None of the disclosed exposures are dependency-type on a named customer or supplier, so the risk here centers on regional economic conditions and depositor behavior rather than the loss of any one counterparty. A downturn concentrated in the D.C./Baltimore corridor, or a broader shift in confidence affecting uninsured deposits, would be the more likely channel through which these concentrations could move results.
For the engine’s reasoning on CBNK’s current verdict — including which dimensions drove the score — see the per-dimension breakdown.
| Symbol | Name | HIGH | MEDIUM | LOW | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMAL | Amalgamated Financial Corp. | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| CBNK● | Capital Bancorp, Inc. | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| ACNB | ACNB Corporation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| ALRS | Alerus Financial Corporation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| AMTB | Amerant Bancorp Inc. | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| ABCB | Ameris Bancorp | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Concentration counts reflect items disclosed in each peer’s most recent 10-K; disclosed-size classification uses TrendMatrix’s internal 10-K extraction taxonomy.